Effect of Aggregate Packing on Strength of Reactive Powder Concrete: Modeling and Experimental Evaluation

Article Preview

Abstract:

This research investigates the effects of aggregate packing degree on the strength of Reactive Powder Concrete (RPC) mixtures on the basis of the Toufar model. To optimize the packing degree of sand for strength development of RPC, various sand blends with the combination of different fraction size were used. In addition, 10 different blends that showed best packing degree were chosen to investigate the compressive strength of RPC. It was found that experimental verification results conform to Toufar model calculations. The test result shows that packing degree had a significant effect on the strength of RPC: Mixtures with higher packing degree can achieve higher compressive strength. Furthermore, Results indicate the Toufar model can predict packing degree of aggregate blends.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

299-304

Citation:

Online since:

June 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Richard, P., & Cheyrezy, M. (1995). Composition of reactive powder concretes. Cement and concrete research, 25(7), 1501-1511.

DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00144-2

Google Scholar

[2] Abbas, S., Nehdi, M. L., & Saleem, M. A. (2016). Ultra-high performance concrete: Mechanical performance, durability, sustainability and implementation challenges. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 10(3), 271.

DOI: 10.1007/s40069-016-0157-4

Google Scholar

[3] Sun, H., Li, Z., Memon, S., Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., Liu, B., & Xing, F. (2015). Influence of ultrafine 2CaO· SiO2 powder on hydration properties of reactive powder concrete. Materials, 8(9), 6195-6207.

DOI: 10.3390/ma8095300

Google Scholar

[4] Chan, Y. W., & Chu, S. H. (2004). Effect of silica fume on steel fiber bond characteristics in reactive powder concrete. Cement and concrete research, 34(7), 1167-1172.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.12.023

Google Scholar

[5] Bektimirova, U., Shon, C. S., Zhang, D., Sharafutdinov, E., & Kim, J. (2018). Proportioning and Characterization of Reactive Powder Concrete for an Energy Storage Pile Application. Applied Sciences, 8(12), 2507.

DOI: 10.3390/app8122507

Google Scholar

[6] Stovall, T., De Larrard, F., & Buil, M. (1986). Linear packing density model of grain mixtures. Powder technology, 48(1), 1-12.

DOI: 10.1016/0032-5910(86)80058-4

Google Scholar

[7] De Larrard, F., & Sedran, T. (2002). Mixture-proportioning of high-performance concrete. Cement and concrete research, 32(11), 1699-1704.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(02)00861-x

Google Scholar

[8] Ipek, M., Yilmaz, K., Sümer, M., & Saribiyik, M. (2011). Effect of pre-setting pressure applied to mechanical behaviours of reactive powder concrete during setting phase. Construction and Building Materials, 25(1), 61-68.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.056

Google Scholar

[9] Sobolev, K., Amirjanov, A., Hermosillo, R., & Lozano, F. C. (2004). The Modeling of Dense Packing of Aggregates as an Approach to Optimizing the Proportioning of Concrete Mixtures. Internet source: http://www. mrr. dot. state. mn. us/materials/meo/2004spring/miscpapers/ d1soblev. pdf.

Google Scholar

[10] Fennis, S. A. A. M. (2011). Design of ecological concrete by particle packing optimization.

Google Scholar

[11] Moini, M., Sobolev, K., Flores-Vivian, I., & Amirjanov, A. (2019). Modeling and Experimental Evaluation of Aggregate Packing for Effective Application in Concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 31(3), 04019001.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002628

Google Scholar

[12] Chang, C. S., & Deng, Y. (2018). A nonlinear packing model for multi-sized particle mixtures. Powder technology, 336, 449-464.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.06.008

Google Scholar

[13] Ji, T., Lin, T., & Lin, X. (2006). A concrete mix proportion design algorithm based on artificial neural networks. Cement and Concrete Research, 36(7), 1399-1408.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.01.009

Google Scholar

[14] Goltermann, P., Johansen, V., & Palbøl, L. (1997). Packing of aggregates: an alternative tool to determine the optimal aggregate mix. Materials Journal, 94(5), 435-443.

DOI: 10.14359/328

Google Scholar

[15] Ji, T., Chen, B. C., Zhuang, Y. Z., Li, F., Huang, Z. B., & Liang, Y. N. (2011). Effects of sand particle size and gradation on strength of reactive powder concrete. In Advanced Materials Research (Vol. 261, pp.208-211). Trans Tech Publications.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.261-263.208

Google Scholar

[16] American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate; ASTM C128; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, (2007).

Google Scholar

[17] American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Test Method for Bulk Density (Unit Weight,) and Voids in Aggregate; ASTM C29; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, (2007).

Google Scholar

[18] American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar; ASTM C1437; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, (2007).

Google Scholar

[19] American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars; ASTM C109; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, (2016).

Google Scholar

[20] American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Practice for Dealing with Outlying Observations; ASTM E178; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, (2016).

Google Scholar