Effects of Direct Coal Liquefaction Residue Additions on Low-Rank Pulverized Coal during Co-Pyrolysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study examined the co-pyrolysis characteristics of low-rank coal (SJC) and direct coal liquefaction residue (DCLR) through thermogravimetric analysis coupled with Fourier transform infrared spectrometry. It also investigated the influences of different mass fractions of DCLR to SJC on the co-pyrolysis characteristics and release regulation of gas phase components. Results showed that with increasing DCLR content, coke yield initially decreased and then increased, but tar and gas yield reversed. Different addition of DCLR changed the composition of the pyrolysis gas in various degrees, and reduced the content of-OH and nitrogen compounds in coke. The H2 content in the gas gradually increased. When 40% DCLR was added, the maximum tar yield was 22.79%, and the maximum H2 yield was 37.12%. At 60% DCLR, the lowest semi-coke yield was 65.01%, and the highest gas yield was 14.65%. The co-pyrolysis of SJC and DCLR can be divided into three stages. The first was the dry degassing stage, during which the adsorbed gas and small-molecule gas were removed on the coal surface at room temperature to 350 °C. The second stage (350 °C–650 °C) was the intense pyrolysis reaction stage, during which a large number of volatiles were obtained. The substantial weight loss rate peak appeared around 450 °C. The weight loss rate of pyrolysis gradually increased with increasing DCLR dosage. The co-pyrolysis of SJC and DCLR was not a simple sum between SJC and DCLR, which indicated a synergistic effect in the co-pyrolysis. The synergistic effect between SJC and DCLR enhances the interaction between free-radical fragments, thereby increasing the yield of pyrolysis tar. The third stage was the shrinkage of semi-coke from 650 °C to the end of the reaction. The polycondensation reaction between free-radical fragments to form solid coke with higher aromaticity, and H2 released.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

167-177

Citation:

Online since:

June 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Song, Y., Tang J. Coal Chemical Technology. Chemical Technology Press, Beijing, (2016).

Google Scholar

[2] Rong. X, Wang. G, Lu. X, et al. Hydrogenation kinetics of Shenhua coal liquefaction residue, Journal of the Chemical Industry & Engineering Society of China. 60.11(2009)2749-2754.

Google Scholar

[3] Khare. S, Amico. M. An overview of conversion of residues from coal liquefaction processes, Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering.91.10 (2013)1660-1670.

DOI: 10.1002/cjce.21771

Google Scholar

[4] Xu. J, Ba. Z, Li. Z, et al. Interactions during co-pyrolysis of direct coal liquefaction residue with lignite and the kinetic analysis, Fuel.215(2018)438-445.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.080

Google Scholar

[5] Xu. J, Ba. Z, Bai. J, et al. Physico-chemical structure and combustion properties of chars derived from co-pyrolysis of lignite with direct coal liquefaction residue, Fuel.187(2017)103-110.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.09.028

Google Scholar

[6] Li. X, Xu. Y, Feng. J, et al. Co-pyrolysis of lignite and Shendong coal direct liquefaction residue, Fuel. 144(2015)342-348.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.12.049

Google Scholar

[7] Song. Y, He. W, Ma. Q, et al. Effect of binder composition on the preparation of formed coke with low-rank coal, International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization. (2017)1-13.

DOI: 10.1080/19392699.2017.1363738

Google Scholar

[8] Chang. Z, Chu. M, Sun. R, et al. Study on co-pyrolysis kinetics of coal direct liquefaction residue and lignite, Coal Science and Technology, 43. 3(2015)138-141, 39.

Google Scholar

[9] Song. Y, Yin. N, Yao. D, et al. Co-pyrolysis characteristics and synergistic mechanism of low-rank coal and direct liquefaction residue, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects. (2019)1-15.

DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2019.1568639

Google Scholar

[10] Li. X, Ma. J, Xue. Y, et al. Properties of semi-coke from co-pyrolysis of lignite and direct liquefaction residue of Shendong coal, Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology. 43.11 (2015)1281-1286.

DOI: 10.1016/s1872-5813(15)30039-6

Google Scholar

[11] Liang. L, Huang. W, Zhang. Q, et al. Research status and advances in catalytic pyrolysis of low-rank coal, Chemical Industry & Engineering Progress. 34. 10 (2015)3617-3622.

Google Scholar

[12] Song. Y, Ma. Q, He. W, et al. Regularity of Gaseous Product Release During Direct Coal Liquefaction Residue Pyrolysis Process, Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 36. 7 (2016)2017-2021.

Google Scholar

[13] Wang. M, Li. Z, Huang. W, et al. Coal pyrolysis characteristics by TG–MS and its late gas generation potential, Fuel.156(2015)243-253.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.04.055

Google Scholar

[14] Song. Y, Ma. Q, He. W, et al. Co-pyrolysis Properties and Product Composition of Low-Rank Coal and Heavy Oil, Energy & Fuels. 31. 1(2017)217-223.

DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02106

Google Scholar

[15] Gao. M, Wang. Y, Dong. J, et al. Release behavior and formation mechanism of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons during coal pyrolysis, Chemosphere. 158(2016)1-8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.05.024

Google Scholar