Microcontact Printing of Multiproteins on the GA Modified Glass Substrate and Its Applications in the Research of Immunoassays

Article Preview

Abstract:

Microcontact printing (μCP) is a newly developed bioresearch technique applied in many fields such as absorption of proteins, adjunction and growth of cells and so forth, because of the controllable structure of its patterned materials. Further experiments showed that the microcontact printed proteins and cells can keep their bioactivity, which provides a feasibility of bio-molecule or cell analysis. The self-assembled molecules of μCP make molecule-scaled reactions possible, which have much higher accuracy compared with large amount reactions in solutions. In this article we first modified the chemical treated slide with APTES (3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane) to form AP-glass substrate, then with GA (glutaraldehyde) to form a GA-AP-glass substrate, and at last used XPS (X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy) technique to show the chemical structure changes of the surface molecules. Next, using μCP,we patterned chicken IgG (Ag1) and rabbit IgG (Ag2) onto the GA-APTES-glass substrate in vertical directions. After incubating the substrate with BSA (bovine serum albumin, a kind of protein) to block the blank place, we exposed the substrate to Anti-Chicken-IgG-FITC (Ab1) and Anti-Rabbit-IgG-TRITC (Ab2). Because of the specific binding between Ab and Ag, through fluorescence microscopy we could see the two-colored fluorescence images on the GA-AP-glass substrate, in which the different colored strands were vertical patterned.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volumes 121-123)

Pages:

721-724

Citation:

Online since:

March 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T. Chovan, A. Guttman, (2002) Microfabricated Devices in Biotechnology and Chemical Processing. Trends in Biotechnology. 20, 116.

Google Scholar

[2] V. W. Jones, J. R. Kenseth, M. D. Porter, C. L. Mosher, E. Henderson, (1998) Microminiaturized Immunoassays Using Atomic Force Microscopy and Compositionally Patterned Antigen Arrays. Anal. Chem. 70, 1233.

DOI: 10.1021/ac971125y

Google Scholar

[3] G. MacBeath, S. L. Schreiber, (2000) Printing Proteins as Microarrays for High-Throughput Function Determination. Science, 289, 1760.

DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5485.1760

Google Scholar

[4] S. Nilsson, C. Lager, T. Laurell, S. Birnbaum, (1995) Thin-layer Immunoaffinity Chromatography with Bar Code Quantitation of C-reactive Protein. Anal. Chem. 67, 3051.

DOI: 10.1021/ac00113a046

Google Scholar

[5] A. Bernard, J. P. Renault, B. Michel, H. R. Bosshard, E. Delamarche, (2000) Microcontact Printing of Proteins. Adv. Mater. 12, 1067.

DOI: 10.1002/1521-4095(200007)12:14<1067::aid-adma1067>3.0.co;2-m

Google Scholar

[6] Wei Tan and Tejal A. Desai, (2003) Microfluidic Patterning of Cellular Biopolymer Matrices for Biomimetic 3-D Structures. Biomedical Microdevices 5: 3, 234-244.

Google Scholar

[7] H. D. Inerowicz, S. Howell, F. E. Regnier, and R. Reifenberger, (2002) Multiprotein Immunoassay Arrays Fabricated by Microcontact Printing. Langmuir 18, 5263-5268.

DOI: 10.1021/la0157216

Google Scholar

[8] E. Kim, X. Xia, X. M. Zhao, G. M. Whitesides, (1997) Solvent-Assisted Microcontact Molding: A Convenient Method for Fabricating Three-Dimensional Structures of Polymeric Materials. Adv. Mater. 9, 651. (b) 200μm (b) 200μm (c) 200μm (c) 200μm.

DOI: 10.1002/adma.19970090814

Google Scholar