Cluster Dynamics Modeling of Materials: Advantages and Limitations

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of this paper is to give a short review on cluster dynamics modeling in the field of atoms and point defects clustering in materials. It is shown that this method, due to its low computer cost, can handle long term evolution that cannot, in many cases, be obtained by Lattice Kinetic Monte Carlo methods. Indeed, such a possibility is achieved thanks to an important drawback that is the loss of space correlations of the elements of the microstructures. Some examples, in the field of precipitation and irradiation of metallic materials are given. The limitations and difficulties of this method are also discussed. Unsurprisingly, it is shown that it goes in a very satisfactory way when the objects are distributed homogeneously. Conversely, the source term describing the primary damage under irradiation, by nature heterogeneous in space and time, is tricky to introduce especially when displacement cascades are produced.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 129)

Pages:

51-58

Citation:

Online since:

November 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] N.M. Ghoniem and S., J. Sharafat Nucl. Mat., Vol. 92 (1980), p.121.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Kiritani, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, Vol. 37 (1974), p.1532.

Google Scholar

[3] S.I. Golubov, A.M. Ovcharenko, A.V. Barashev, and B.N. Singh, Phil. Mag., Vol. A81 (2001), p.643.

Google Scholar

[4] A.D. Brailford, R. Bullough, M.R. Hayns, J. Nucl. Mat. Vol. 60 (1976), p.246.

Google Scholar

[5] G. Martin, Solid-State Phase Transformation in Inorganic materials, Vol. 2, TMS 2005, (2005), p.291.

Google Scholar

[6] E. Clouet, A. Barbu, L. Laé and G. Martin, Acta Mater. Vol. 53 (2005), p.2313.

Google Scholar

[7] E.A. Marquis, D.N. Seidman, Acta. Mater. Vol. 49 (2001), p. (1909).

Google Scholar

[8] G.M. Novotny, A.J. Ardell, Mater. Sci. Eng. Vol. A318 (2001), p.144.

Google Scholar

[9] L.K. Mansur Nucl. Technol. Vol. 40 (1978), p.5.

Google Scholar

[10] A.D. Brailford and R. Bullough, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Vol. 302 (1981), p.87.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Duparc Hardouin, C. Moingeon, N. Smetniansky-de-Grande, A. Barbu, J. Nucl. Mat., Vol. 302 (2002), p.143.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3115(02)00776-6

Google Scholar

[12] V.I. Dubinko, A.S. Abyzov and A.A. Turkin, J. Nucl. Mat., Vol. 336 (2002), p.11.

Google Scholar

[13] R. Bullough, M.R. Hayns and M.H. Wood, J. Nucl. Mat. Vol. 90 (1980), p.44.

Google Scholar

[14] C.C. Fu, to be published.

Google Scholar

[15] J. Dalla Torre, J.L. Bocquet, , N.V. Doan, E. Adam and Barbu A., Phil. Mag., Vol. 85 (2005), p.549.

Google Scholar

[16] C.C. Fu, J. Dalla Torre, F. Willaime, J.L. Bocquet and A. Barbu, Nature materials, Vol. 4 (2005), p.68.

Google Scholar

[17] J. Dalla Torre, Chu-Chun Fu, F. Willaime, A. Barbu and J.L. Bocquet, J. Nucl. Mat., Vol. 352 (2006), p.49.

Google Scholar

[18] A. Barbu, to be published.

Google Scholar