Frequencies of Tilt and Twist Boundaries among Random Grain Boundaries

Article Preview

Abstract:

There are a number of classifications of homophase grain boundaries. It is quite common to divide them into twist, tilt and general boundaries. As in the case of the classification into coincident lattice (CSL) boundaries and non-CSL boundaries, one may ask about the possible frequencies of incidence of tilt and twist boundaries in a set of “random” boundaries. The proba¬bilities of occurrence of these particular boundary types are clearly defined if small deviations from pure twist and tilt conditions are allowed. We estimated the probabilities numerically for the cases of cubic and hexagonal holohedries. For a given randomly generated boundary, a computer program searched for the nearest pure-tilt and pure-twist boundaries. All symmetrically equivalent representations of the random boundary were processed, and the smallest distance was taken as the result. The distance was based on both the difference in misorientations and the deviation between boundary inclinations. The findings concerning tilt boundaries turned out to be striking. For instance, if the allowed deviation from pure-tilt conditions is only 1°, then as many as 39.0% and 21.2% of random boundaries have near-tilt character for the cubic and hexagonal cases, respectively. If the limiting deviation is raised to 5°, the frequencies of near-tilt boundaries reach 98.6% and 77.0%, respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 160)

Pages:

95-99

Citation:

Online since:

February 2010

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A.P. Sutton and R.W. Balluffi: Interfaces in Crystalline Materials. Clarendon Press, Oxford, (1995).

Google Scholar

[2] D.H. Warrington and M. Boon: Acta Metall. Vol. 23 (1975), p.599.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Morawiec, J.A. Szpunar and D.C. Hinz: Acta Metall. Matter. Vol. 41 ( 1993), p.2825.

Google Scholar

[4] D.M. Saylor, A. Morawiec and G.S. Rohrer: Acta Mater. Vol. 51 (2003), p.3663.

Google Scholar

[5] V. Randle: J. Microscopy Vol. 230 (2008), p.406.

Google Scholar

[6] D.J. Rowenhorst and P.W. Voorhees: Metall. Mater. Trans. A Vol. 36 (2005), p.2127.

Google Scholar

[7] V. Singh and A.H. King: Scripta Metal. Vol. 34 (1996), p.1723.

Google Scholar

[8] M.A. Groeber, B.K. Haley, M.D. Uchic, D.M. Dimiduk and S. Ghosh: Mater. Charact. Vol. 57 (2006), p.259.

Google Scholar

[9] Viewpoint set number 41: 3D Characterization and Analysis of Materials. Scripta Mater. Vol. 55 (2006).

Google Scholar

[10] K. Thornton and H.F. Poulsen: MRS Bull. Vol. 33 (2008), p.587.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Morawiec, in: Proc. of the Third Int. Conf. on Grain Growth, edited by H. Weiland, B.L. Adams and A.D. Rollett, TMS, Warrendale (1998), p.509.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Morawiec: J. Appl. Cryst. Vol. 42 (2009), p.783.

Google Scholar

[13] F. James: MI UIT. Function Minimization and Error Analysis. Reference Manual. Version 94. 1. http: /wwwasdoc. web. cern. ch/wwwasdoc/minuit/minmain. html, (1998).

Google Scholar

[14] A. Morawiec: Scripta Mater. Vol. 61 (2009), p.438.

Google Scholar

[15] A. Morawiec: J. Appl. Cryst. Vol. 42 (2009), p.308.

Google Scholar

[16] J.K. Mackenzie: Biometrika Vol. 45 (1958), p.229.

Google Scholar

[17] H. Grimmer: Scripta Metal. Vol. 13 (1979), p.161.

Google Scholar

[18] A. Morawiec: J. Appl. Cryst. Vol. 28 (1995), p.289.

Google Scholar