Robust Optimal Control of MAV Based on Linear-Time Varying Decoupled Model Dynamics

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper discusses a nonlinear robust control design procedure to micro air vehicle that uses the singular value (μ) and μ-synthesis technique. The optimal robust control law that combines a linear parameters varying (LPV) of UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) are realized by using serial connection of the Kestrel autopilot and the Gumstix microprocessor. Thus, the robust control feedback loops, which handle the uncertainty of aerodynamics derivatives, are used to ensure robustness stability of the UAV local dynamics in longitudinal and lateral control directions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 198)

Pages:

571-576

Citation:

Online since:

March 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Aguiar A. P., Hespanha, J. P., Trajectory-tracking and path-following of underactuated autonomous vehicles with parametric modelling uncertainty, IEEE Tran. on Automation Conference, Vol. 52, pp.1362-1379, (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/tac.2007.902731

Google Scholar

[2] Balas G. J., et all, Application of µ-synthesis techniques to momentum management and attitude control of the space station, AIAA Guidance, Nav. Cont. Conf., New Orleans, (1991).

Google Scholar

[3] Burns R. S., Advanced Control Engineering, Butterworth-Heinemann, (2001).

Google Scholar

[4] Gordnier R. E., High fidelity computational simulation of a membrane wing airfoil, Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol. 25, pp.897-917, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2009.03.004

Google Scholar

[5] Mathworks Inc., www. mathworks. com.

Google Scholar

[6] Micropilot Inc., www. micro-pilot. com.

Google Scholar

[7] Mystkowski A., An aplication of mu-synthesis for control of a small air vehicle and simulation results, Journal of Vibroengineering, Vol. 14, nr 1, pp.79-86, (2012).

Google Scholar

[8] Mystkowski A., The robust control of unmanned aerial vehicle, research project report No 0029/R/T00/2010/11 conducted in the years: 2010¸2013, in polish, (2012).

Google Scholar

[9] Mystkowski A., Ostapkowicz P., Verification of MAV dynamics model with vortex piezo-generators to boundary flow control, Warsaw Inst. of Aviation, Z. 216, pp.103-125, (2011).

Google Scholar

[10] NASA, Vortex-lattice utilization. NASA SP-405, NASA-Langley, Washington, (1976).

Google Scholar

[11] Procerus, Inc., www. procerus. com.

Google Scholar

[12] Tornado 1. 0, User Guide, Reference manual, Relase 2. 3, (2001).

Google Scholar

[13] Valavanis K. P., Advances in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, State of the Art and the Road to Autonomy, Vol. 33, Springer, (2007).

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6114-1

Google Scholar

[14] www. gumstix. com.

Google Scholar

[15] www. topmodelcz. cz.

Google Scholar

[16] Zhou K., Doyle J. C., Glover K., Robust and Optimal Control, Prentice Hall, (1996).

Google Scholar

[17] Zhou K., Doyle J., Essentials of Robust Control, Prentice Hall, (1998).

Google Scholar