Comparison between Prediction of Liquid Fraction versus Temperature and Experimental Results from DSC and SPSC

Article Preview

Abstract:

The processing window is important for the semisolid processability of alloys. This study focusses on the kinetics of diffusion. It compares prediction of fraction liquid versus temperature taking into account both thermodynamic and kinetics, with experimental results from Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Single Pan Scanning Calorimetry (SPSC). SPSC is a novel technique with an order of magnitude higher accuracy than DSC. A range of Al-Si binary alloys has been investigated. The studies reveal that the simulation results predicted by DICTRA (DIffusion-Controlled TRAnsformations) show the same pattern with experimental results in the relationship of fraction liquid-temperature. However, the SPSC results are closer to the prediction results than DSC curves even with the relatively large sample size associated with SPSC. This is potentially a significant result as conventionally one of the difficulties is predicting the liquid fraction versus temperature for the heating of a billet for semi-solid processing. DSC results are known to be unrepresentative because the heating rates which can be achieved in DSC are much lower than those in induction heating. In addition, the DSC results are dependent on sample size and heating rate. The long term aim is to gain confidence in prediction with software packages which will reduce trial and error.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volumes 217-218)

Pages:

442-449

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H.V. Atkinson, P. Kapranos, D.H. Kirkwood, Alloy development for thixoforming, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Semi-solid Processing of Alloys and Composites, Turin, Italy; Sep 27-29, Brescia, Italy: Edimet-Spa; 2000, pp.443-450.

Google Scholar

[2] A. A. Kazakov, Alloy compositions for semisolid forming, Advanced Materials & Processes, 157 (2000) 31-34.

Google Scholar

[3] D. Liu, H.V. Atkinson, H. Jones, Thermodynamic prediction of thixoformability in alloys based on the Al–Si–Cu and Al–Si–Cu–Mg systems, Acta Materialia, 53 (2005) 3807-3819.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.028

Google Scholar

[4] U. Curle, H. Möller, J. Wilkins, Shape rheocasting of high purity aluminium, Scripta Materialia, 64 (2011) 479-482.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.11.010

Google Scholar

[5] U. Curle, H. Möller, J. Wilkins, Shape rheocasting of unmodified Al–Si binary eutectic, Materials Letters, 65 (2011) 1469-1472.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.02.040

Google Scholar

[6] A. Borgenstam, L. Höglund, J. Ågren, A. Engström, DICTRA, a tool for simulation of diffusional transformations in alloys, Journal of Phase Equilibria, 21 (2000) 269-280.

DOI: 10.1361/105497100770340057

Google Scholar

[7] H.B. Dong, J.D. Hunt, A novel single-pan scanning calorimeter: measurement of thermophysical properties of metallic alloys, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 64 (2001) 341-350.

Google Scholar

[8] H. Dong, M. Shin, E. Kurum, H. Cama, J. Hunt, Determination of liquid fraction during solidification of aluminium alloys using a single-pan scanning calorimeter, Fluid phase equilibria, 212 (2003) 199-208.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3812(03)00257-7

Google Scholar

[9] Information on http: /thermocalc. com. cn/thermo_calc/datebasepdf/TTAL7. pdf.

Google Scholar

[10] Information on http: /www. thermocalc. com/res/pdfDICTRAflyers/DICTRA27_Examples. pdf.

Google Scholar

[11] D. Larouche, C. Laroche, M. Bouchard, Analysis of differential scanning calorimetric measurements performed on a binary aluminium alloy, Acta Materialia, 51 (2003) 2161-2170.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(03)00003-x

Google Scholar

[12] H.B. Dong, R. Brooks, Determination of liquidus temperature in Al–Si and Al–Si–Mg alloys using a single-pan scanning calorimeter, Materials Science and Engineering A 413 (2005) 480-484.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.09.016

Google Scholar

[13] G. Höhne, W.F. Hemminger, H. J. Flammersheim, Differential scanning calorimetry, Springer, (2003).

Google Scholar