Comparative Analysis between Conventional and Dry Turning

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, there is an attempt to monitor and evaluate machining parameters when turning 34CrNiMo6 material under different cooling and lubrication conditions. The machining parameters concerned are temperature of the cutting tool and the workpiece, level of vibrations of the cutting tool, surface roughness of the workpiece, noise levels of the turning process and current drawn by the main spindle motor. Four different experimental machining scenarios were completed, specifically: conventional wet turning process, dry cutting and two additional modes employing cooling by cold air. Experimental data were acquired and recorded by an optimally designed network of sensors. Experimental data were statistically analyzed in order to reach conclusions. According to the research that has been done, although, overall, minimum cutting tool and workpiece temperatures were observed under wet machining, cold air cooling is capable of achieving comparable cooling results to wet machining. The lowest values of surface roughness were achieved by wet machining, whereas the lowest level of cutting tool vibrations were observed under cold air cooling.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 261)

Pages:

267-274

Citation:

Online since:

August 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M.A. El Baradie, Cutting Fluids: Part I. Characterisation, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 56 (1999) 786-797.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(95)01892-1

Google Scholar

[2] V.P. Astakhov, Ecological Machining: Near Dry Machining, in: J.P. Davim (Ed), Machining: Fundamentals and Recent Advances, Springer-Verlag, London, 2008, pp.195-223.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84800-213-5_7

Google Scholar

[3] Y.M. Shashidhara, S.R. Jayaram, Vegetable Oils as a Potential Cutting Fluid - An Evolution, Tribology International 43 (2010) 1073-1081.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2009.12.065

Google Scholar

[4] E.O. Bennett, D.L. Bennett, Occupational Airway Diseases in Metalworking Industry, Part 1: Respiratory Infections, Pneumonia, Chronic Brochitis and Emphysema, Tribology International 18(3) (1985) 169-176.

DOI: 10.1016/0301-679x(85)90137-9

Google Scholar

[5] Occupational Safety and Health Administration, USA Department of Labor, Metalworking Fluids: Safety and Health Best Practices Manual (https: /www. osha. gov /SLTC /metalworkingfluids / metalworkingfluids_manual. html#e).

Google Scholar

[6] M. Nouari, G. List, F. Girot, D. Coupard, Experimental Analysis and Optimisation of Tool Wear in Dry Machining of Aluminium Alloys, Wear 255 (2003) 1359-1368.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(03)00105-4

Google Scholar

[7] M.A. Rosen, H.A. Kishawy, Sustainable Manufacturing and Design: Concepts, Practices and Needs, Sustainability 4(2) (2012) 154-174.

DOI: 10.3390/su4020154

Google Scholar

[8] R.A. Frosh, Industrial ecology: adapting technology for a sustainable world, Environment Magazine 37(10) (1995) 17-37.

Google Scholar

[9] A. Gungor, S.M. Gupta, Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: a survey, Computers & Industrial Engineering 36 (1999) 811-853.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(99)00167-9

Google Scholar

[10] International Technology Research Institute, World Technology Division, Department of Energy USA, Environmentally Benign Manufacturing, April (2001).

Google Scholar

[11] M. Delmas, Stakeholders and Competitive Advantage: The case of ISO 14001, Production and Operations Management, 10(3) (2001) 343-358.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00379.x

Google Scholar

[12] http: /www. arsenal-bg. com/c/cemented-carbide-inserts-142/carbide-grades- for-turning-242.

Google Scholar

[13] http: /www. buyitfrom. com/gnt/vortexgen. html.

Google Scholar

[14] User's Manual for Meech Coldstream Airgun.

Google Scholar

[15] Meech Coldstream Airgun, Technical Data Brochure for Airgun Technology.

Google Scholar

[16] IMPAC INV 780-P datasheet.

Google Scholar

[17] User's Manual for Innovatest TV-300.

Google Scholar

[18] Innovatest advanced material solutions.

Google Scholar

[19] V. Gutakovskis, G. Bunga, G. Pikurs, Cutting Tool Vibration in the Metal Cutting Process, Journal of Vibroengineering 13 (2011) 676-681.

Google Scholar

[20] J. Malchaire, Sound Measuring Instruments, (1994).

Google Scholar

[21] Meech, Air Technology: Reducing Energy and Noise; Both Effectively and Economically (https: /www. tom-parker. co. uk/upload/files/literature/literature_file-1064. pdf).

Google Scholar

[22] M. Thomas, Y. Beauchamp, A.Y. Youssef, J. Manousave, Effect of Tool Vibrations on Surface Roughness during Lathe Dry Turning Process, Computers & Industrial Engineering 31 (1996) 637-644.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(96)00235-5

Google Scholar