Effect of X-Ray µCT Scanning on the Growth and Activity of Microorganisms in a Heap Bioleaching System

Article Preview

Abstract:

In heap bioleaching, a process in which microorganisms are required for the regeneration of leach reagents and control of reaction products, inaccessibility of non-surface mineral grains is a key cause of low recovery and long extraction times. High resolution, non-destructive 3D X-ray micro-computed tomography (μCT) is an imaging technique that has been successfully demonstrated for the study of abiotic leaching of non-surface minerals. For this technique to be applied to biotic leaching, it is required that the iron and sulphur oxidizing abilities of the microorganisms are not affected by the irradiation experienced. In the current study, the feasibility of investigating biotic leaching by X-ray μCT is explored by examining the relative energies required to achieve the high image resolution needed for mineral grain mapping while avoiding microbial deactivation. A mixed mesophilic and moderately thermophilic culture in solution was used and exposed to various X-ray energy doses. Direct microscopic cell counting and redox potential were measured to quantify the microbial activity and growth. The results showed that exposure to X-ray does not affect microbial activity at 35-90 kV, 200-280 μA and a distance of 7.2 cm between energy source and sample, however, it has an influence at 120 and 150 kV. This indicates that while X-ray μCT does influence the microbial cultures, it can be used for bioleaching studies at lower energy doses.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 262)

Pages:

143-146

Citation:

Online since:

August 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C.L. Brierley, How will biomining be applied in future?, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China. 18 (2008) 1302-1310.

DOI: 10.1016/s1003-6326(09)60002-9

Google Scholar

[2] P. Galleguillos, F. Remonsellez, F. Galleguillos, N. Guiliani, D. Castillo, C. Demergasso, Identification of differentially expressed genes in an industrial bioleaching heap processing low-grade copper sulphide ore elucidated by RNA arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction, Hydrometallurgy. 94 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2008.05.031

Google Scholar

[3] H.R. Watling, The bioleaching of sulphide minerals with emphasis on copper sulphides - a review, Hydrometallurgy. 84 (2006) 81-108.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2006.05.001

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Ghorbani, M. Becker, J. Petersen, S.H. Morar, A. Mainza, J.P. Franzidis, Use of X-ray computed tomography to investigate crack distribution and mineral dissemination in sphalerite ore particles, Miner. Eng. 24 (2011) 1249-1257.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2011.04.008

Google Scholar

[5] J. Petersen, Heap leaching as a key technology for recovery of values from low-grade ores - a brief review, Hydrometallurgy. 165 (2016) 206-212.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.09.001

Google Scholar

[6] M.A. Fagan-Endres, J.J. Cilliers, A.J. Sederman, S.T.L. Harrison, Spatial variations in leaching of a low-grade, low-porisity chalcopyrite ore identified using X-ray mCT, Miner. Eng. 105 (2017) 63-68.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2017.01.010

Google Scholar

[7] Q. Lin, S.J. Neethling, L. Courtois, K.J. Dobson, P.D. Lee, Multi-scale quantification of leaching performanceusing X-ray tomography, Hydrometallurgy. 164 (2016) 265-277.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.06.020

Google Scholar

[8] K.J. Dobson, S.T.L. Harrison, Q. Lin, A. Ni Bhreasail, M.A. Fagan-Endres, S.J. Neethling, P.D. Lee and J.J. Cilliers, Insights into ferric leaching of low grade metal sulfide-containing ores in an unsaturated ore bed using X-ray computed tomography, Minerals. 7 (2017).

DOI: 10.3390/min7050085

Google Scholar

[9] H. Schmidt, D. Vetterlein, J.M. Köhne, T. Eickhorst, Negligible effect of X-ray m-CT scanning on archaea and bacteria in an agricultural soil, Soil Biol. Biochem. 84 (2015) 21-27.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.010

Google Scholar