Quantitative Evaluation of Secondary Phases in a Weld Joint Made of COST F and FB2 Creep Resistant Steels

Article Preview

Abstract:

Conventional (CCT) and accelerated (ACT) creep tests of a weld joint made of COST F and COST FB2 steels were carried out over a temperature range from 550 °C to 650 °C. Fracturing of the crept specimens was located in the heat affected zone (HAZ) of the F steel. Two specimens were selected after CCT and ACT for quantitative evaluation of the precipitates and compared to the weld joint in as-received conditions. Scanning and transmission electron micrographs were used to measure the precipitate size. Both methods were compared and the accuracy of the results was discussed. It was concluded that ACT can simulate the precipitation of chromium carbides and structure recovery during long term creep exposures. However, precipitation of Laves phase during CCT was not recorded after ACT. Therefore, it is difficult to use ACT in this experiment for estimating the long term creep strength.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 270)

Pages:

183-188

Citation:

Online since:

November 2017

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. -U. Kern, K.H. Mayer, B. Donth, G. Zeiler, A. DiGianfrancesco, The European efforts in development of new high temperature rotor materials – COST536, in: J. Lecomte-Beckers, Q. Contrepois, T. Beck and B. Kuhn (Eds. ), Materials for Advanced Power Engineering 2010, Forschungzentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, 2010, pp.29-38.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Hald, Microstructure and long-term creep properties of 9-12%Cr steels, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 85 (2008) 30-35.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.06.010

Google Scholar

[3] S. T. Mandziej, Simulative accelerated creep test on Gleeble, Materials Science Forum 638-642 (2010) 2646-2651.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.638-642.2646

Google Scholar

[4] J. Kasl, D. Jandová, E. Chvostová, Creep tests and microstructure evaluation of dissimilar weld joint of COST FB2 and COST F steels, in: A. Shibli (Eds. ), Life/Defect Assessment and Failure in High Temperature Plant, HIDA-6, European Technology Development, Surrey (UK), 2013, S9-04.

DOI: 10.1080/09603409.2017.1380909

Google Scholar

[5] J. Kasl, D. Jandová, S.T. Mandziej, I. Schindler, Comparison of results of accelerated and conventional creep tests of dissimilar weld joint of steel FB2 and F, Materials Science Forum 891 (2017) 322-329.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.891.322

Google Scholar

[6] J. Hald, Creep resistant 9-12%Cr steels-long-term testing, microstructure stability and development potentials, in: Proc. Super-High Strength Steels, Associazione Italiana Di Metallurgia, Rome, 2005, paper No. 146.

Google Scholar

[7] R.L. Higginson, C.M. Sellars, Quantitative Metallography, MANEY, London, (2003).

Google Scholar