Effect of Ga and Gd as Catalyst in ZnO/Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites upon Photodegradation Process

Abstract:

Photocatalytic degradation was improved by addition of gallium (Ga) and gadolinium (Gd) as catalysts for zinc oxide/reduced graphene oxide (ZnO/rGO) composites. Preparation, physical characterisation, dye degradation, photocatalytic activity and kinetic mechanisms of Ga-ZnO/rGO and Gd-ZnO/rGO composites were investigated. Physical characteristics of the composites were studied using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffractometry (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Photocatalytic activity of the composites was investigated by degradation of reactive blue dye solution as a function of contact time, catalyst type and catalyst concentration. Results indicated that Ga-ZnO/rGO (2 wt%Ga) and Gd-ZnO/rGO (0.6 wt%Gd) were capable of dye degradation at 62.76% and 54.43% respectively under UV irradiation for 3 h with the photocatalytic process described by pseudo first order kinetics as 0.0059 and 0.0058 min^-1. Findings confirmed that addition of Ga and Gd in composite systems enhanced removal of reactive blue dye solution. Optimum conditions were recorded for Ga 2 wt% and Gd 0.6 wt% in ZnO/rGO composite. Results indicated that Ga-ZnO/rGO (2 wt%Ga) and Gd-ZnO/rGO (0.6 wt%Gd) showed promise for removal of reactive blue dye.

• Periodical: Solid State Phenomena (Volume 287)
• Pages: 59-63
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.287.59
• Online since: February 2019
• Authors: Suntree Sangjan*, Rattikan Saetan, Assareeya Aoboun
• Keywords: Degradation, Photocatalytic, Reduced Graphene Oxide, ZnO

References

[1] Sampa Chakrabarti, Binay K. Dutta: Journal of Hazardous Materials B112 (2004), p.269–278.

[2] Nasser Modirshahla, Aydin Hassani, Mohammad A. Behnajady, Rajab Rahbarfam: Desalination 271 (2011), p.187–192.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.027

[3] Pantelis A. Pekakis, Nikolaos P. Xekoukoulotakis, Dionissios Mantzavinos: Water Research 40 (2006 ), p.1276 – 1286.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.01.019

[4] Nikos Lydakis-Simantiris, Despina Riga, Eleftheria Katsivela, Dionissios Mantzavinos, Nikolaos P. Xekoukoulotakis: Desalination 250 (2010), p.351–355.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.055

[5] Bitao Su, Yongyong Dong, Zhengjuan Jin, Qizhao Wang, Ziqiang Lei: Ceramics International 42 (2016), p.7632–7638.

[6] D. Amaranatha Reddy, Rory Ma, Tae Kyu Kimn: Ceramics International 41 (2015), p.6999–7009.

[7] Mansoor Farbod, Marzieh Kajbafvala: Powder Technology 239 (2013), p.434–440.

[8] K. Ravichandran, K. Nithiyadevi, B. Sakthivel, T. Arun, E. Sindhuja, G. Muruganandam, : Ceramics International 42 (2016), p.17539–17550.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.08.067

[9] Ádám Vass, Zoltán Pászti, Szabolcs Bálint, Péter Németh, Gábor P. Szíjjártó, András Tompos, Emília Tálas: Materials Research Bulletin 83 (2016), p.65–76.

DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2016.05.012

[10] Molly Meng-JungLi, ZiyanZeng, FenglinLiao, XinlinHong, ShikChi EdmanTsang: Journal of Catalysis 343 (2016), p.157–167.