Limits and Potential of 3D Printing Technologies for Construction of Concrete Shells

Article Preview

Abstract:

Concrete shells are a very effective type of building structures due to their ability to bridge large spans with minimal construction thickness. This type of building structures built on the medieval vaulting techniques and, regarding the use of reinforced concrete over the last 100 years, it has overcome the limitations of the masonry vaulting technologies and enabled to increase the span of structures to tens of meters. The construction technology to realize concrete shells using monolithic casting into formwork is besides abovementioned advantages characterized by high labour and thanks to the cost and manufacturing intensity of double curved formwork panels it allows economical realization of only selected structural geometries. Its considerable limitation is, besides the costly production of double curvature formwork, also the laborious installation of formwork and falsework structures. The solution seems to be in line with the upcoming transition to Construction 4.0 robotizing the construction technology of shells that could create a similar increase in productivity and design possibilities as was the technological transition between vaults and shells. One of the promising technologies of robotic production seems to be digital fabrication methods and, in particular, 3D printing or in other words additive manufacturing. This wasteless technology, which has been used to date for experimental projects mainly for the realization of vertical bearing structures, has, despite the first attempts at realizing vaults, a number of technological limitations. In this article, authors aim to summarize and indicate possible constraints of on site 3D printing of domes. They further indicate the possible ways to overcome these limitations and suggest two different means of on site 3D printing of hemispherical dome and the dome based on the catenary profile using extrusion nozzles with different profiles. Finally they discuss the Eurocode requirements for concrete shells and suggest technological solutions for on site 3D printed shells in terms of structural reinforcement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 292)

Pages:

249-256

Citation:

Online since:

June 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Popescu, L. Reiter, A. Liew, T. Van Mele, R.J. Flatt, P. Block, Building in concrete with a knitted stay-in-place formwork: Prototype of a concrete shell bridge,Structures,14, (2018). 322-332.

DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2018.03.001

Google Scholar

[2] Information on https://research.gsd.harvard.edu/maps/portfolio/2018-cevisama.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Van Dousselaere and S. Van Geeteruyen, Exoskeleton: An emperical investigation into a bottom-up approach to structural design,, Disertation Thesis, Gent, (2017).

Google Scholar

[4] M. Rippmann, T. van Mele, M. Popescu, E. Augustynowicz, T. Méndez Echenagucia, C. Calvo Barentin, U. Frick, and P. Block, The Armadillo Vault: Computational design and digital fabrication of a freeform stone shell,, in Advances in Architectural Geometry 2016, (2016), 344-363.

DOI: 10.3218/3778-4_23

Google Scholar

[5] F. Xu, VULCAN: Closing the Loop in 3D-Printed Architectural Design,, Architectural Design, vol. 86, no. 5, (2016), 82-91.

DOI: 10.1002/ad.2093

Google Scholar

[6] S. Lim, R. A. Buswell, P. J. Valentine, D. Piker, S. A. Austin, and X. De Kestelier, Modelling curved-layered printing paths for fabricating large-scale construction components,, Additive Manufacturing, vol. 12, (2016), 216-230.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2016.06.004

Google Scholar

[7] C. B. Costanzi, 3D Printing Concrete onto Flexible Surfaces,, MSc. Thesis, Delft, (2016).

Google Scholar

[8] A. R. Ponce and R. R. Meléndez, Curves of Clay: Bóvedas del Bajío,, in Nexus V, Architecture and Mathematics., Florence: Kim Williams Books, 2004, pp.143-154.

Google Scholar

[9] P. Block and M. Rippmann, The Catalan Vault: A Historical Structural Principle with a Bright Future,, DETAIL: Simple and Complex, 53(5), (2013), p.532,535-536.

Google Scholar

[10] D. López López, M. Domènech Rodríguez, and M. Palumbo Fernández, "Brick-topia", the thin-tile vaulted pavilion,, Case Studies in Structural Engineering, 2, (2014), pp.33-40.

DOI: 10.1016/j.csse.2014.09.001

Google Scholar

[11] Information on https://architizer.com/blog/practice/details/sameep-padora-maya-somaiya-library.

Google Scholar

[12] T. Bock and T. Linner, Construction Robots: Elementary Technologies and Single-Task Construction Robots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp.65-78.

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139872041

Google Scholar

[13] Information on: https://all3dp.com/1/3d-printing-support-structures.

Google Scholar

[14] R. A. Buswell, W. R. Leal de Silva, S. Z. Jones, and J. Dirrenberger, 3D printing using concrete extrusion: A roadmap for research,, Cement and Concrete Research, 112, (2018), 37-49.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.006

Google Scholar

[15] B. Huang, Alternate Slicing and Deposition Strategies for Fused Deposition Modelling,, PhD. Thesis, Auckland, (2014).

Google Scholar

[16] B. Khoshnevis, Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies,, in Automation in Construction, 13(1), (2004), 5-19.

DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.012

Google Scholar

[17] Information on http://contourcrafting.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Lunar-2.jpg.

Google Scholar

[18] G. Cesaretti, E. Dini, X. De Kestelier, V. Colla, and L. Pambaguian, Building components for an outpost on the Lunar soil by means of a novel 3D printing technology,, Acta Astronautica, 93, (2014), 430-450.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.07.034

Google Scholar

[19] Information on https://inhabitat.com/worlds-largest-delta-style-3d-printer-can-print-nearly-zero-cost-housing-out-of-mud.

Google Scholar

[20] Information on: https://www.ip.rwth-aachen.de/teaching/dynamo-tutorials.

Google Scholar

[21] B. Khoshnevis, X. Yuan, B. Zahiri, J. Zhang, and B. Xia, Construction by Contour Crafting using sulfur concrete with planetary applications,, in Rapid Prototyping Journal, 22(5), (2016), 848-856.

DOI: 10.1108/rpj-11-2015-0165

Google Scholar

[22] B. Khoshnevis, D. Hwang, K. T. Yao, and Z. Yeh, Mega-scale fabrication by Contour Crafting,, International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 1(3), (2006), 301–320.

DOI: 10.1504/ijise.2006.009791

Google Scholar

[23] S. J. Keating, J. C. Leland, L. Cai, N. Oxman, Toward site-specific and self-sufficient robotic fabrication on architectural scales. Sci. Robot. 2(5), eaam8986, (2017).

DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.aam8986

Google Scholar

[24] F. Bos, R. Wolfs, Z. Ahmed, and T. Salet, Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing,, Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 11(3), (2016) 209-225.

DOI: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867

Google Scholar

[25] C. Gosselin, R. Duballet, P. Roux, N. Gaudillière, J. Dirrenberger, and P. Morel, Large-scale 3D printing of ultra-high performance concrete – a new processing route for architects and builders,, Materials & Design, 100, (2016), 102-109.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.097

Google Scholar

[26] EN 1992-1-1:2004. Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures – Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings (2011). ( 2). Czech Office for Standards, Metrology and Testing, Prague, (2011).

Google Scholar

[27] F. Bos, Z. Ahmed, E. Jutinov, and T. Salet, Experimental Exploration of Metal Cable as Reinforcement in 3D Printed Concrete,, Materials, 10(11), (2017).

DOI: 10.3390/ma10111314

Google Scholar