[1]
M. Waqar, A.M. Memon AM, M. Sabih, et al, Composite pipelines, Analyzing defects and advancements in non-destructive testing techniques. Eng Fail Anal 2024; 157: 107914.
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108108
Google Scholar
[2]
L. Lambiasi L, D. Ddiba, K. Andersson, et al, Greenhouse gas emissions from sanitation and wastewater management systems: a review. J Water Clim Chang 2024; 3: 1797–1819.
DOI: 10.2166/wcc.2024.603
Google Scholar
[3]
M. Azeem, H.H. Ya, M.A. Alam, et al, Application of Filament Winding Technology in Composite Pressure Vessels and Challenges: A Review. J. Energy Storage 2022; 49: 103468.
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.103468
Google Scholar
[4]
J.H. Jeon, C.K. Yoon, Y. Quan Y, et al, Effect of fiber entanglement in chopped glass fiber reinforced composite manufactured via long fiber spray-up molding. Heliyon 2023; 9: e22170.
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22170
Google Scholar
[5]
J.R. Hutchinson, P.J. Schubel, N.A. Warrior, A cost and performance comparison of LRTM and VI for the manufacture of large scale wind turbine blades. Renew Energy 2011; 36: 866-871.
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.025
Google Scholar
[6]
M.I. Banton, J.S. Bus, J.J. Collins, et al, Evaluation of potential health effects associated with occupational and environmental exposure to styrene – an update. J Toxicol Environ Health 2019; 22: NOS. 1–4, 1–130.
DOI: 10.1080/10937404.2019.1633718
Google Scholar
[7]
Information on https://www.e-sbirka.cz/sb/2007/361/2024-07-12
Google Scholar
[8]
A. Parashar, P. Mertiny, Adhesively bonded composite tubular joints: Review. Int J Adhes Adhes 2012; 38: 58–68.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.05.004
Google Scholar
[9]
S. Aimmanee, P. Hongpimolmas, K. Ruangjirakit, Simplified analytical model for adhesive-bonded tubular joints with isotropic and composite adherends subjected to tension. Int J Adhes Adhes 2018; 86: 59–7.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.08.010
Google Scholar
[10]
ASTM D7905, Standard Test Method for Determination of the Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites.
DOI: 10.1520/d7905_d7905m
Google Scholar
[11]
ASTM D5528-01, Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites.
DOI: 10.1520/d5528-01r07
Google Scholar
[12]
R. Kottner, R. Hynek, T. Kroupa, Identification of parameters of cohesive elements for modeling of adhesively bonded joints of epoxy composites. Appl Comput Mech 2013; 7: 137 – 144.
Google Scholar
[13]
E.G. Arhore, M. Yasaee, Lay-up optimisation of fibre–metal laminates panels for maximum impact absorption. J Compos Mater 2020; 54: 4591-4609.
DOI: 10.1177/0021998320937396
Google Scholar
[14]
Information on https://www.swm.aco/
Google Scholar
[15]
EN 858-1:2002. Separator systems for light liquids (e.g. oil and petrol).
Google Scholar
[16]
R. Wu, Z. Stachurski, Evaluation of the Normal Stress Interaction Parameter in the Tensor Polynomial Strength Theory for Anisotropic Materials. J Compos Mater 1984; 18: 456-463.
DOI: 10.1177/002199838401800505
Google Scholar
[17]
EN 976-1:1997. Underground tanks of glass-reinforced plastics (GRP) - Horizontal cylindrical tanks for the non-pressure storage of liquid petroleum based fuels.
DOI: 10.3403/bsen976
Google Scholar
[18]
EN 978:2000. Underground tanks of glass-reinforced plastics (GRP) - Determination of factor alpha and factor beta.
DOI: 10.3403/01246990
Google Scholar
[19]
Information on https://classes.engineering.wustl.edu/2009/spring/mase5513/abaqus/docs /v6.6/books/usb/default.htm?startat=pt06ch26s05alm43.html (2009, accessed 10 February 2025).
Google Scholar