Increasing the Corrosion Resistance of Type 201 Stainless Steel Pitting by Electrochemical Method in a Citric Acid Solution

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study investigates the corrosion resistance of Stainless Steel 201 through varying surface treatments and testing in a 3.5 wt% NaCl solution, mimicking seawater conditions. Given its prevalent use in industries like oil, Stainless Steel 201's resistance to pitting corrosion is crucial, primarily when used in pipes. The research employs electrochemical techniques, specifically Cyclic Voltammetry and Immersion, to treat the material's surface. The surface treatment using citrict acid (C₆H₈O₇) varying the concentration of 1, 1.5, and 2 M. Corrosion tests utilize open circuit potential, anodic polarization patterns, and characterization via optical microscopy and SEM-EDS. Results indicate that the material subjected to a Cyclic Voltammetry treatment with 2M citric acid exhibited the lowest corrosion rate at 0.001243 mmpy, with 21 instances of pitting corrosion. Conversely, untreated Stainless Steel 201 showed a higher corrosion rate of 0.006177 mmpy and 87 instances of pitting corrosion. This underscores the significant improvement in corrosion resistance achieved through the specified surface treatment, highlighting its potential value for enhancing Stainless Steel 201's longevity and performance in corrosive environments. Keywords: Stainless Steel 201, Cyclic Voltammetry, Immersion, Open Circuit Potential (OCP), Anodic polarization Patterns, Corrosion Rate, Pitting Corrosion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 385)

Pages:

15-33

Citation:

Online since:

February 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Naghizadeh M, Mirzadeh H. Effects of Grain Size on Mechanical Properties and Work‐Hardening Behavior of AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel. steel Res Int [Internet]. 2019 Oct 28; 90 (10). Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/

DOI: 10.1002/srin.201900153

Google Scholar

[2] Pedeferri P, Ormellese M. Corrosion science and engineering. Vol. 720. Springer; 2018.

Google Scholar

[3] Abbasi Aghuy A, Zakeri M, Moayed MH, Mazinani M. Effect of grain size on pitting corrosion of 304L austenitic stainless steel. Corros Sci [Internet]. 2015;94:368–76. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010938X15000992

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.02.024

Google Scholar

[4] Koch G. Cost of corrosion. In: Trends in Oil and Gas Corrosion Research and Technologies [Internet]. Elsevier; 2017. p.3–30. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780081011058000012

Google Scholar

[5] Fouda AS, AbdEl-Maksoud SA, El-Hossiany A, Ibrahim A. Corrosion Protection of Stainless Steel 201 in Acidic Media using Novel Hydrazine Derivatives as Corrosion Inhibitors. Int J Electrochem Sci [Internet]. 2019;14(3):2187–207. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1452398123018515

DOI: 10.20964/2019.03.15

Google Scholar

[6] Chuaiphan W, Srijaroenpramong L. Effect of welding speed on microstructures, mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of GTA-welded AISI 201 stainless steel sheets. J Mater Process Technol [Internet]. 2014; 214(2): 402–8. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924013613003026

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.09.025

Google Scholar

[7] Godbole N, Yadav S, Belemkar S. Review Article A Review on Surface Treatment of Stainless Steel Orthopedic Implants. 2016;36(33):190–4.

Google Scholar

[8] Fouda AS, El-Maksoud SAA, Belal AAM, El-Hossiany A, Ibrahium A. Effectiveness of Some Organic Compounds as Corrosion Inhibitors for Stainless Steel 201 in 1M HCl: Experimental and Theoretical Studies. Int J Electrochem Sci [Internet]. 2018;13(10):9826–46. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1452398123062429

DOI: 10.20964/2018.10.36

Google Scholar

[9] Villegas-Tovar J, Gaona-Tiburcio C, Lara-Banda M, Maldonado-Bandala E, Baltazar-Zamora MA, Cabral-Miramontes J, et al. Electrochemical Corrosion Behavior of Passivated Precipitation Hardening Stainless Steels for Aerospace Applications. Vol. 13, Metals. 2023.

DOI: 10.3390/met13050835

Google Scholar

[10] Jafarian M, Gobal F, Danaee I, Biabani R, Mahjani MG. Electrochemical studies of the pitting corrosion of tin in citric acid solution containing Cl−. Electrochim Acta [Internet]. 2008;53(13):4528–36. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0013468608000698

DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.01.051

Google Scholar

[11] Zheng ZB, Zheng YG. Effects of surface treatments on the corrosion and erosion-corrosion of 304 stainless steel in 3.5% NaCl solution. Corros Sci [Internet]. 2016;112:657–68. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010938X16306965

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.09.005

Google Scholar

[12] da Costa AT, de Oliveira MCL, Antunes RA. Interplay between the composition of the passive film and the corrosion resistance of citric acid‐passivated AISI 316L stainless steel. Surf Interface Anal. 2021;53(3):374–84.

DOI: 10.1002/sia.6927

Google Scholar

[13] G61-86 A. Standard test method for conducting cyclic potentiodynamic polarization measurements for localized corrosion susceptibility of iron-, nickel-, or cobalt-based alloys. (2009)

DOI: 10.1520/g0061

Google Scholar

[14] Procaccini R, Schreiner WH, Vázquez M, Cere S. Surface study of films formed on copper and brass at open circuit potential. Appl Surf Sci. 2013;268:171–8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.12.050

Google Scholar

[15] Hastuty S, Tada E, Nishikata A, Tsutsumi Y, Hanawa T. Improvement of Pitting Corrosion Resistance of Type 430 Stainless Steel by Electrochemical Treatments in a Concentrated Nitric Acid. ISIJ Int [Internet]. 2014; 54(1): 199-205. Available from: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/ article/isijinternational/54/1/54_199/_article

DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.54.199

Google Scholar