Automated Testing and Calibration of Sheet Metal Models

Article Preview

Abstract:

The efficient development of high-quality sheet metal components increasingly depends on predictive numerical simulations conducted prior to forming operations. Achieving such accuracy requires precise calibration of models that represent the complex mechanical behaviour of metals. Mechanical testing provides the essential data for calibration, revealing material anisotropy, strain hardening, and ductile fracture. However, traditional characterisation approaches are often labor-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to operator variability. Within the phenomenological framework, numerous tests are typically required to capture the full material response, including repeats for statistical reliability, leading to high costs and extended lead times. To address these limitations, this study introduces an automated mechanical testing platform designed to rapidly acquire experimental data useful for material models. The use of a cobot enables fully automated test sequences, ensuring high repeatability and reducing manual intervention. When combined with automated model calibration, this approach provides a direct link between the physical material (metallic sheet) and its virtual mechanical representation.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] N. Souto, A. Andrade-Campos and S. Thuillier: Int. J. Mater. Forming Vol. 10 (2017), 353-367.

Google Scholar

[2] L. Germain, M. Gonçalves, A. Andrade-Campos and S. Thuillier: MATEC Web of conferences Vol. 408 (2257), 01075.

DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/202540801075

Google Scholar

[3] M. Conde, S. Coppieters and A. Andrade-Campos: Int. J. Mech. Sciences Vol. 264 (2024), 108813.

Google Scholar

[4] M. Dunand and D. Mohr: Int. J. Solids Struct. Vol. 47 (2010), 1130-1143.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Kacem, H. Laurent and S. Thuillier: Eng. Fracture Mech. Vol. 248 (2021), 107686.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Kumar, A. Kacem and S. Thuillier: Procedia Structural Integrity Vol. 61 (2024), 62-70.

Google Scholar

[7] A. Okada, S. Igarashi and Y. Kakazu: Fusion Eng. Design Vol. 18 (1991), 525-529.

Google Scholar

[8] T. Beerli, Christian C. Roth and D. Mohr: Acta Mater. Vol. 263 (2024), 119539.

Google Scholar

[9] Christian C. Roth, T. Tancogne-Dejean and D. Mohr: Additive Manuf. Vol. 43 (2021), 101998.

Google Scholar

[10] F. Barlat, H. Aretz, J.W. Yoon, M.E. Karabin, J.C. Brem, R.E. Dick: Int. J. Plasticity Vol. 21 (2005), 1009-1039.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.004

Google Scholar

[11] A. Andrade-Campos, R. de-Carvalho and R.A.F. Valente: Int. J. Mech. Sci. Vol. 54 (2012), 294-305.

Google Scholar