Intersublevel Relaxation Dependence of Carrier Hopping in Self-Organized InAs Quantum Dot Heterostructures

Article Preview

Abstract:

The temperature dependence of the photoluminescence (PL) emission spectra of self-organized InAs/GaAs quantum dots (QDs) grown under different growth conditions in the range 20-300K has been investigated. Three InAs QD samples were grown on (100) 2º-tilted toward (111)A Si-doped GaAs substrates by metal-organic chemical vapour epitaxy (MOVPE), with various size uniformities and dot densities. Observing the measured PL spectra at 20K, the differences caused by size uniformities among the three samples were obvious. The PL spectra were simulated with rate equations, taking into account the carrier relaxation between the first excited state and the ground state. Interestingly, the calculated relaxation lifetimes at 20K were 198ps, 139ps and 54ps for the samples. The temperature dependent PL spectra were also simulated using the same model. Based on the calculated values of temperature dependent relaxation lifetimes, the differences in changes with temperature among the three samples are discussed. The results are consistent with the thermal redistribution effect.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volumes 99-100)

Pages:

41-48

Citation:

Online since:

July 2004

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2004 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] U. Bockelmann and G. Bastard, Phys. Rev. B 42 (1990) 8947.

Google Scholar

[2] Kohki Mukai, Nobuyuki Ohtsuka, Hajime Shoji, and Mitsuru Sugawara: Phys. Rev. B54 (1996) R5243.

Google Scholar

[3] Kohki Mukai, Nobuyuki Ohtsuka, Hajime Shoji, and Mitsuru Sugawara: Appl. Phys. Lett. 68 (1996) 3013.

Google Scholar

[4] C. Lobo, R. Leon, S. Marcinkevicius, W. Yang, P. C. Sercel, X. Z. Liao, J. Zou, and D. J. H. Cockayne: Phys. Rev. B 60 (1999) 16 647.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Fafard, S. Raymond, G. Wang, R. Leon, D. Leonard, S. Charbonneau, J. L. Merz, P. M. Petroff, and J. E. Bowers: Surf. Sci. 362 (1996) 778.

DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(96)00532-8

Google Scholar

[6] Z. Y. Xu, Z. D. Lu, Z. L. Yuan, X. P. Yang, B. Z. Zheng, J. Z. Xu, W. K. Ge, Y. Wang, J. Wang, and L. L. Chang: Superlattices Microstruct. 23 (1998) 381.

Google Scholar

[7] A. Patane, M. Grassi Alessi, F. Intonti, A. Polimeni, M. Capizzi, F. Martelli, M. Geddo, A. Bosacchi, and S. Franchi: Phys. Status Solidi A 164 (1997) 493.

DOI: 10.1002/1521-396x(199711)164:1<493::aid-pssa493>3.0.co;2-d

Google Scholar

[8] G. G. Tarasov, YU. I. Mazur, Z. Ya. Zhuchenko, A. Maabdorf, D. Nickel, J. W. Tomm, H. Kissel, C. Walther, and J. T. Masselink: J. Appl. Phys. 88 (2000) 7162.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1323516

Google Scholar

[9] Wen-qin Cheng, Xiao-gang Xie, Zhen Yang Zhong, Li-hong Cai, Qi Huang, and Jun-ming Zhou: Thin Solid Films 312 (1998) 287.

Google Scholar

[10] H. Benisty, C. M. Sotomayor Torres, and C. Weisbuch: Phys. Rev. B 44 (1991) 10 945.

Google Scholar

[11] X. Q. Zhang, Sasikala Ganapathy, Hidekazu Kumano, Kasturi Uesugi, and Ikuo Suemene: J. Appl. Phys. 92 (2002) 6813.

Google Scholar

[12] Z. Y. Xu, Z. D. Lu, X. P. Yang, Z. L. Yuan, B. Z. Zheng, J. Z. Xu, W. K. Ge, Y. Wang, J. Wang, and L. L. Chang: Phys. Rev B 54 (1996) 11 528.

Google Scholar

[13] L. M. Herz, L. V. Dao, M. B. Johnston, M. Gal, and C. Jagadish: 1998. Proceedings. of Conference on Optoelectronic and Microelectronic Material Devices (1999) 344.

Google Scholar