Search results

Concentrically braced frames are one of the most common seismic force resisting systems because of their high strength and stiffness.
This strength and stiffness can provide a reserve of lateral force resisting capacity during a large earthquake, which may play a role in the seismic collapse behaviour of the braced frame.
In order to investigate the potential influence of the range of possible beam-column-gusset plate designs, this paper assesses the effect of the fixity of these connections on the behavior of a six-storey special concentrically braced frame.
The moment frame behaviour of beams and columns due to the existence of the gusset plate can improve the collapse performance of the braced frames, especially near collapse when the steel braces fracture [5].
Tsai, Investigation of the seismic response of three-story special concentrically braced frames, J.

Seismic Stability of Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames Santiago R.
Eugenio Espejo 2410, Quito, Ecuador 22108 Newmark Laboratory, 205 North Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801 USA aszaruma@adstren.com, bfhnstck@illinois.edu Keywords: Buckling-restrained braced frame, Seismic stability, Dual system, P-∆ effects.
Buckling Restrained Braced Frames (BRBFs) are widely used as seismic force resisting systems due to their ductility and energy dissipation.
Results from nonlinear static and dynamic analyses allowed assessment of seismic behavior.
For the building investigated in this study, there are more gravity columns than braced frame columns and this can explain the difference.

The column stability response in multi-tiered braced frames is first presented using a pure numerical model of the braced frame studied.
Cyclic quasi-static testing where a predefined history of loads, displacements, or a combination of both is applied to a structural component to examine the effect of parameters such as material properties, boundary conditions, bracing conditions on its behavior.
Multi-axial pseudo-dynamic hybrid simulations was conducted to evaluate the behaviour of steel bridge piers under multi-directional seismic loading [13, 14].
Finally, the results of the hybrid simulation performed on a two-tiered steel concentrically braced frame is presented. 2 STEEL MULTI-TIERED BRACED FRAMES 2.1 Seismic demand on columns The bracing configuration in which multiple bracing panels are stacked within the storey height is referred to as multi-tiered braced frames (MT-BFs).
The continuous pseudo-dynamic hybrid simulation was used in this study to evaluate the seismic stability response of steel multi-tiered braced frame columns.

Research on Seismic Performance of the Steel-Braced Frame Changjiao Hu 1,a, Xinwu Wang 2,b 1School of Civil Engineering,Henan University of Science and Technology,471023, China 2Department of Civil Engineering, Luoyang Institute of Science and Technology, 471023, China a email: 1246686577@qq.com , b email: wxw197100@sina.com Key words:Steel-braced frame,Seismic performance,supporting forms Abstract:With the purpose of comprehending the seismic performance of steel-braced frame system better and more comprehensivly, the paper overviewed and summarized the hysteretic performance,ductility and energy dissipation performance of the steel-braced frame based on a large number of abroad documents.The force was on the seismic performance of steel-braced frame in different supporting forms and the insufficiency in the research.
The types of support [1] Steel braced frame could be divided into the central support frame and eccentrically braced frame depending on the support and the position of beam-column connection.Center support frame could be divided cross support, single diagona support, K form support and Vform support according to the arrangement of diagonal suppor(as shown in Fig.1).
The research actuality for the seismic behavior of steel braced frame system The related experimental study.American and Japanese researchers had used the scheme to carry out a series of pseudo dynamic test by using removable support bar that converted the center support to eccentric center support and unsupported frame for a six-story and two span steel braced frame,then they analyzed.It was concluded that the failure mechanism of steel braced frame and supporting role as well as the effect of support on seismic performance of steel frame.CaoJunfeng [2]and LvJia[3]respectively carried out a seismic test for different support types of steel frame model with a certain scale ratio.By comparison with removable support,they analyzed seismic performance of the braced frame and pure frame and the advantages of setting up support (as shown in Fig.3).
(a)Pure steel frame (b) Steel-braced frame Fig.3.The load-displacement curves at the top of the frame under seismic peak acceleration with 400 gal Balendra [4] and others by changing support stiffness of knee brace support steel frame the pseudo dynamic test, it is concluded that under the seismic action to support the increase of stiffness on seismic performance of steel braced frame structure and the influence of components of the yield mechanism, at the same time according to the seismic design principle, and optimize the structure design, to improve the performance of the structure.Shi Yongjiu[5]carried out the cyclic loading test by changing the length of the energy dissipation beam section on the eccentrically braced steel frame and obtained the destruction of the eccentric braced frame essence and hysteretic properties under seismic action, and the effect of the length of the curved link beam on the performance of the frame (as shown in Fig.4, Fig.5).
Fig.4.Hysteresis curve of braced frame Fig.5.Hysteresis curve of braced frame (e= 660 mm) (e= 8800 mm) Conclusions Based on the overview of steel braced frame researches at home and abroad, study abroad could be found relatively early, more mature.The researches in our country were mainly through software simulation and had very few test verification.Through the comparative analysis of the literatures,we could learned that: 1) The steel support frame had larger stiffness and hysteresis loop which compared with the pure frame and had good energy dissipation performance under the earthquake.Through the analysis and comparison to support internal force calculation,it showed that the support could bear part of the base shear. 2) under the same load, knee braced had the minimum internal force,while pure frame had the maximum internal force which showed that knee brace had large lateral stiffness and bearing capacity and had the best seismic performance. 3) The

Evaluation of Seismic Behavior in Non-Seismic Concentrically Braced Frames Hee Jin Yeom1,a, Eun Bi Jung1,b and Jung Han Yoo1,c * 1 School of Architecture, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, 232 Gongreung-ro Nowon-gu, Seoul, 139-743, Republic of Korea a yeumman@nate.com, b eunbie07@gmail.com, c happyjh@seoultech.ac.kr Keywords: Non-Seismic Concentrically Braced Frames, Special Concentrically Braced Frames, Finite Element Analysis, Seismic Performance, Balanced Design Procedure Abstract.
As a result, many existing CBFs designed to these requirements may not exhibit desirable behavior in a seismic event.
Existing braced frame structures that do not meet modern SCBF criteria shall be referred to herein as NCBFs (Non-Seismic Concentrically Braced Frames) [6].
Braced frame specimen.
Summary and conclusions An analytical study of the behavior of non-seismic braced frames and shared shear tab connections was conducted using a validated model with the finite element program ANSYS [3].

This is due to the P-D effects, which are generated by the vertical loads acting on the lateral deformed configuration of the frame, proving that vertical loads in some extent affected the horizontal load-displacement behavior of the braced frames.
In general they are characterized by the post-buckling behavior of the braces in compression producing pinching effects.
De Luca, Seismic design of concentric braced frames, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 78 (2012) 22-37
Yoshida, Experimental studies on the elastic-plastic behavior of braced frames under repeated horizontal loading.
Filiatrault, Seismic response of concentrically braced steel frames made with rectangular hollow bracing members, J.

F.: Seismic behavior of eccentrically braced steel building.
B.: An experimental investigation of the seismic behaviors and design of eccentrically braced steel frames.
S.: Resisting seismic behavior study of an adding cover-plate protocol used for single diagonal eccentrically braced steel frames.
M.: Energy dissipation behavior and simplification analysis of eccentrically braced frames.
Z., : Hysteretic behavior analysis of D-type eccentrically braced steel frames with reinforced rib under cyclic loading.

Buckling restrained braced frames (BRBFs) in which members yield under both tension and compression without significant buckling have been used in recent years in order to ensure the desired seismic performance of special concentrically braced frames.
BRBFs are similar to the special concentrically braced frames in that seismic accelerations are resisted by a building-frame members and diagonal braces whereas the design procedure is different.
Nevertheless, the main drawback is the unstable hysteretic behavior of CBFs.
Buckling restrained braced frames (BRBFs) show stable hysteretic behavior and large energy dissipation could be obtained, conversely to CBFs.
Conclusions The major aim of this paper was to explore the effects of different configuration of BRBs on the overall behaviour up to failure of 3-D RC framed buildings.

a) b) Fig. 1. a) Trilinear lateral force-displacement response of a FBF-MRF system; b) Pall friction damper Friction braced frames can also be used to form effective standalone seismic force resisting systems for new structures that combine the high lateral stiffness of concentrically braced steel frames and the superior ductility and energy dissipation capacity of the highly ductile steel moment frame, eccentrically braced frame or buckling restrained braced frame systems.
In multi-storey buildings, this behaviour is generally accentuated to cause concentration of storey drifts along the frame height that may eventually lead to frame collapse by dynamic instability [20].
This behaviour may be mitigated by providing the structure with minimum lateral resistance.
The columns had to satisfy the minimum flexural strength requirements specified in CSA S16 for columns of braced steel frames.
[8] Filip-Vacarescu N, Stratan A, Dubina D, “Behavior of concentrically braced frames with friction dampers,” Pollack Periodica, 6(1): 59-71, 2011

This approach is supported by some research results about the seismic behavior of chevron braced frames [18].
(a) 2-story X-braced frame (b) suspended zipper frame Fig.3 Upgrading schemes to chevron braced frames Slenderness ratios and width-to-thickness ratios of bracing members The effective slenderness and the compactness are two important factors influencing the seismic behavior of braces as demonstrated in numerous studies on the inelastic cyclic response of braces for CBFs [23-25].
Research on the effect of column stiffness in braced frames shows that if no, or very low column flexural stiffness exists, a soft story mechanism and large story drift demands will result from a design level earthquake [35].
Seismic Design Procedures for Concentrically Braced Frames.
Standardized Brace Connectors for Seismic-Resistant Concentrically Braced Frames.