Search results

%C %Si %Mn %Cr %S.Al.
El% STD 10 15 20 25 30 35 650 660 670 680 690 700 710 720 holding temp.
El% STD Fig.3 TS ranges obtained Fig. 4 Coiling Temp. versus TS It is clear that coiling temperature should be less than 250°C to obtain the aimed TS for this alloy for all other applied production conditions.
The results showing that there is no strong correlation appeared between elongation % in the applied ranges of holding temperature and coiling temperatur as shown in Fig. 6 &7, therefore holding temperature can be selected below 680°C (there is a weak tendency of increasing El% with decreasing holding temperature) Fig.6 Holding temp. versus El% Fig. 7 Coiling temp. versus El% Elongation % tends to increase with lower tensile strength as shown in Fig.8 So that, the coiling temperature is preferred to be just below 250°C and the holding temperature to be just below 680°C for ~4 seconds. 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 540 560 580 600 620 640 660 TS MPa El% Fig. 8 TS. versus El% 540 560 580 600 620 640 660 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 3.8 mm 3.2 mm 2.8 mm Coiling temp.
Different combinations of these parameters were applied to find the best combination to achieve the aimed properties § According to the results, holding temperature is preferred to be below 680°C (there is a weak tendency of decreasing El% with increasing holding temperature) for ~4 seconds and the coiling temperature to be just below 250°C for better ductility

Synthesis of LAuNRs The LAuNRs were synthesized by using a modified seeded growth method described by Murphy et al. recently [31].
Results and discussion Since the seminal reports by Wang et al. [34], Murphy et al. [35], and El-Sayed et al. [36], seeded growth of AuNRs in the presence of cationic surfactant CTAB has been continuously optimized and become the most prevalent growth method for AuNRs.
El-Sayed, W.
El-Sayed, H.
El-Sayed, M.A.

Process parameters for the Al 2219 deposits.
Elong (%) T62 Typ A1 A6 A6m 40 35 35 30 Elongation, % El 15 on i n, % 30 o 25 gat 20 Stress, MPa 25 Stress, MPa 20 15 10 10 5 5 0 0 Figure 2.
Tensile properties of heat treated Al 2219 compared with Al 2219 wrought products Al 2219 deposits compared with Al 2219 in annealed (O) and naturally aged (T4) tempers [4]. wrought products in the T62 condition [4]. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Avg.
El (%) AD - L AD - T T6 - L T6 - T C A1 parameters 45 45 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Avg.
boundaries in as-deposited Al 2219.

Kuang at el. investigated H2S molecule adsorption onto small gold clusters [12].
Hamilton at el. [14].
Zhao et al. [5].
Schlegel, et al.
Naumenko et al. , J.

Osteoblast-Mediated Resorption of Porous Bioactive SCPC Granules Enhances Bone Regeneration in Human Extraction Sockets Heba E.AbdelRazik1,a, Miho Nakamura1,b, Leire Bergara-Muguruza1,c, Uruj Sarwar1,d, Mohammad Hassan2,e, Robert Horowitz3,g and Ahmed El-Ghannam2,f 1Medicity Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Tykistökatu 6, 20520, Turku, Finland 2Department of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte NC 28223 USA 3Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, The NYU College of Dentistry, New York, NY, 10010 USA aheba.abdelrazik@utu.fi, bmiho.nakamura@utu.fi, cleire.l.bergaramuguruza@utu.fi, duruj.f.sarwarhussain@utu.fi, emohamed_hassan13@h-eng.helwan.edu.eg, grah7@nyu.edu, farelgha@uncc.edu Keywords: Bone graft, bone regeneration, osteoclast, silica calcium phosphate Abstract.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.bioactmat.2017.05.007 [4] El-Ghannam AR.
[6] El-Ghannam A, Nakamura M, Muguruza LB, Sarwar U, Hassan M, Fotawi R Al, et al.

Similar diffraction of amorphous WO3 thin films prepared by spin coater technique has been obtained by Hsu et. al. [17].
El Marssi, Applied Surface Science, 153 (1999) 1
El-Kadry, A.
El-Kadry, O.
El-Nahass and H.B.

An n-type drift layer (nitrogen [N] ≈ 1 × 1016 cm−3; 10 μm thick) was grown epitaxially and a p-type layer (aluminum [Al] ≈ 3 × 1020 cm−3; 1 μm thick) was implanted on the substrate.
(a) EL image of the p-i-n diode, with red arrows indicating the direction of applied stress.
(a) EL image of p-i-n diode with red arrows indicating the direction of applied stress.
(a) EL image of p-i-n diode with red arrows indicating the direction of applied stress.
(a) EL image of p-i-n diode with red arrows indicating the direction of applied stress.

Introduction For the jet refrigeration system, it was found that the constant pressure mixing ejector is more widely used than the constant area ejector, because it has a better performance than that of constant area mixing ejector.[1]The constant pressure model was firstly developed by Eames,[2] and confirmed by El-Dessouky et al. in their study. [3] El-Dessouky et al. also created another easy semi-empirical model to predict the entrainment ratio with experimental data from experiments [2,4,5-10]on steam ejectors.
[3] H.El-Dessouky, H.Ettouney, I.Alatiqi, G.
Al-Nuwaibit: Evaluation of steam jet ejector.

The predicted R2 values of UTS, YTS and EL are 92.34%, 90.81% and 88.87% respectively, with the average accuracy 90.67%.
[5] Tong Z, Wang L, Zhu G, et al.
[6] Lu S, Zhou Q, Ouyang Y, et al.
[7] Wang C, Fu H, Jiang L, et al.
[8] Mi X X, Tian L J, Tang A T, et al.

The massive interest in robust optimization over thepast fifteen years was triggered by the work of Ben-Tal and Nemirovski, e.g. [1, 6, 2] and El Ghaoui et al. [7, 8].
This has been proposed by Ben-Tal and Nemirovski, e.g. [1, 6, 14], and El Ghaoui et al. [7, 8] for conic optimization problems and has been adjusted to general nonlinear optimization problems with state equations by Diehl et al
El Ghaoui, H.
El Ghaoui, F.
El Ghaoui.