Search results

Two parameters were studied to determine the optimum condition to produce WO3 nanostructures which were ratio of sodium tungstate dehydrate to cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) concentration (1:1, 2:1, 4:1, 6: 1) and pH of the hydrothermal reaction solution (pH 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5).
Figure 3 shows the XRD pattern of the WO3 nanostructures for concentration ratios of 4:1 and 6:1.
Fig. 2: Surface morphology of WO3 nanostructures formed at various concentration ratio of precursor solution Na2WO4.2H2O to CTAB ratio: (a) 1:1, (b) 2:1, (c) 4:1, (d) 6: 1 and (e) cross-section of (d).
References [1] B.W.
Garnier: Thin Solid Films Vol. 479 (2005), p. 201– 206 [6] L.

The reaction type (1) starting temperatures are listed in Tab3 (ΔGT=0).
Fig.1 The reaction (1) relationship under different pressure the Gibbs free energy and temperature Tab3.
According to tab3~5: The reaction (1~3) under the same pressure, With the increase of temperature, indium oxide carbothermal reaction more easily, The carbon content of materials with high In2O3:C molar ratio of 1:3, The reaction can generate elemental In;When the carbon content of less than In2O3:C molar ratio of 1:3, will produce intermediate InO, In2O.
Mineral Deposits,2007,26(4):475-479
Copper Engineering,2011(1):25-29

Results Densities of green bodies and sintered specimens are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
References [1] C.P.
Li, Influence of Toughening Method on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Alumina-Matrix Composites, Materials Science Forum 475-479 (2005) 909-912
CIEC11, Lausanne (2008) 1-8

Table 1.
(Lr = 1) × Lr (N −1) / 2 N for 1 ≤ Lr < Lrmax (12) N and Lr max are as in Eqns. (9) and (10).
The plasticity correction function, f(Lr), is defined in the mismatch option as follows: f(Lr) = 1+ 1 2 Lr     −1/ 2 × 0.3 + 0.7exp(−µM Lr 6) [ ] for 0 ≤ Lr ≤1 (13) f(Lr) = f (Lr =1) × Lr (N M −1)/ 2NM for 1 < Lr ≤ Lr max (14) where µM = M −1 (FYM /FYB −1) /µW + (M − FYM /FYB) /µB < 0.6 else µM = 0.6 (15) µB = 0.001 EB σYB < 0.6 else µB = 0.6 (16) µW = 0.001 EW σYW < 0.6 else µW = 0.6 (17) Lr max = 1 2 1+ 0.3 0.3− NM       (18) where M=σYW/σYB is the mismatch factor defining the ratio of weld (σYW) to base (σYB) metal yield strengths.
Webster (Guest Editor), "European Structural Integrity Assessment Procedure - SINTAP", Special Issue of the Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 67 (2000) 479, pp. 481-668
Mech., 67 (2000) 479, pp. 529-546

Liu Wei [1] and Ge Dawei [2] have shown that the solution treatment should meet the conditions of rapid temperature rise.
Standard steel sheet tensile specimens are shown in Fig. 1.
Table 1 Chemical composition of 20LH5 stainless steel Ingredient C Si Mn Ni Cr Cu N Mass fraction (%) 0.0843 0.52 10.35 0.6174 14.04 0.88 0.18 Fig. 1 Standard tensile specimen of 20LH5 stainless steel (Unit: mm) Experimental Methods
(1) Material phase diagram simulation and solution treatment process formulation.
References [1] Liu, Wei.

FT IR (cm-1): 1701, 2732. 1-(4-(tert-Butyldimethylsilyloxy)phenyl)-2-propyn-1-ol 3.
FT IR (cm-1): 2118, 3310.
Table 1.
Fig. 1.
References [1] S.

Table 1.
Cpk/Ppk Impact ³ 1,67 < 1,67 < 1,33 Safety / legal B A Functions D C B Appearance/ behavior E D C Table 4.
Cpk/Ppk Impact ³ 1,67 < 1,67 < 1,33 Safety / legal B A Main functions C Secondary functions D C Appearance/ behavior E D Table 5.
An example of the matrix is shown in Fig. 1.
Occurrence in a range 1¸2 means that the failure connected with a measured characteristics is prevented or is very unlikely (1 ppm and less).

Figure 1 – Fibres performance.
References [1] CITEVE.
Res. 2012, 479–481, 676–679 [4] Zhang, Z., Li, Y., Gong, C. and Wu, H.
Fashion and Textiles, 2019, 6(1), 1-13 [11] Almeida, M.
No. 1.

The density and molar volume of glass as a function of Nd2O3 content are shown in Fig. 1.
Table 1.
References [1] C.K.
Solid. 356 (2010) 474-479
Eng. 2014 (2014) 1-5.

The chemical compositions and tests on these pipes are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
References [1] J.M.
Morimoto, X120 UOE Pipeline with Improved Properties and Varied Sizes, Proceedings of IPC 2006 1 (2006) 10–15
Cagganello, Electric resistance welding at a glance, TPJ-The Tube & Pipe Journal 1 (2002) 44-55