Search results

A time step of 1 fs was used.
Results and discussion Fig. 1 shows the atomic volume as a function of temperature for the alloy Cu46Zr46Al8.
Fig.1 Atomic volume as function of temperature.
Xia, jhxiahf@163.com，+86-13983843228 References [1] J.
A 319 (1970) 479

The 3D model of the mentioned wagon, made in a system of the CAD class, is shown in Fig. 1.
In the Fig. 1 are indicated areas of wagon paneling particularly susceptible to mechanical damage arising from the loading and unloading method of transported material as well as susceptible to damage resulting from the physico-chemical properties of the transported freight.
Inner paneling of wagon side walls Paneling of a wagon floor Inner paneling of front and rear walls Fig. 1.
Acknowledgement The work was carried out under the project number PBS2/A6/17/2013 realized as a part of the Applied Research Program, funded by the National Research and Development Centre References [1] A.
Ociepka, Motion analysis of mechatronic equipment considering the example of the Stewart platform, Solid State Phenomena. 220/221 (2015) 479-484

Due to the characteristic of single-peaked, correlation coefficient is often adopted as follows, and the distribution of correlation coefficients is shown in Fig.1
(1) Fig. 1 The distribution map of correlation coefficients Where and presents the reference and the deformed subset intensity value, respectively.
b. use the Eq.1 to evaluate the fitness for every particle.
Reference [1] W.H.
Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2004, 9(126): 479-488

The typical discharge spectrum of electrical equipment is shown in Fig.1.
Fig.1 Typical electrical equipment discharge spectrum Principle of UV Pulse Detection.
(1) Compared to UV power method, UV pulse method is more sensitivity and it’s easier to apply.
Therefore, setting sampling time as 0.2s, 0.4s, 0.6s, 0.8s and 1.0s, measures pulses frequency by every 10cm from 20cm to 90cm.
Developments in Power System Protection, Conference Publication No. 479 IEE, 2001:157-160

In most previous works, researchers in this area focused on the names of persons, organizations, locations, etc[1].
Table 1.
Traditional features used in NER systems Feature-1 What is the token?
References [1] R.
Brown, et al., "Class-based n-gram models of natural language," Computational linguistics, vol. 18, pp. 467-479, 1992

Fu 1, a, P.
Ying 1, b, J.
Yan 1, d, X.
K −1. m −1 for x=0.08.
Weitze, V Leute, Solid State Ionics 101-103 (1997) 479

Model predictions for the steady-state magnetization and magnetostriction in the [100] direction in response to a magnetic field at constant compressive stress are shown in Figs. 1(a) and 1(b).
In this case, Maxwell's equations are reduced to 1 r ∂ ∂r �r∂H ∂r � = 1 ρe ∂B ∂t = µ0 ρe �∂H ∂t + ∂M ∂t � , H(r0, t) = Hext, H(r, 0) = H0, (15)���������� �
��� ���� 
��������� ����� �� ���� � ���� �
�� � Figure 3: General Tonpilz transducer used for model development. 0 0.01 0.02 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 Time, sec Magnetic Field, kA/m (a) −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 Magnetic Field, kA/m Magnetic Induction, T (b) −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 0 10 20 30 40 Time, sec Microstrain (c) Figure 4: Tonpilz model dynamic actuation simulation with kl = (EA/l)/8, a bias stress of −5 MPa and a 100 Hz external field input where (a) shows the spatial variation of the magnetic field with the smallest amplitude field at the center, (b) shows the average magnetic induction vs. applied magnetic field, and (c) shows the rod elongation u/l vs. applied magnetic field.
For all simulations the rod dimensions are 1/4 × 1 inches, E = 60 GPa, ρ = 77.1 Kg/m3, λ100 = 173 × 10−6, λ111 = 20 × 10−6, µ0Ms = 1.62 T, K4 = 10 kJ/m3, kBθ/V = 200 kJ/m3, τ = 1 × 10−9 sec, and ρe = 7 × 10−7 Ωm.
References [1] M.
Lograsso, "Quasi-static transduction characterization of Galfenol," Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 16, pp. 471-479, 2005

The information of test beams is as shown in Fig.1 and Tab.1.
Tab.1: Mechanical indexes of main materials concrete C30/ Mpa fcu ft Ec 26.4 2.3 2.85×104 Rebar HRP400/ Mpa fy fs Es 455 620 2.0×105 CFRP/Mpa ff ft Ef 3793 0.111 2.43×105 Fig.1: Size and reinforcement 2.2 Reinforcement scheme Layers of CFRP Fi=0 Fi= 42.52 Fi= 63.78 1 L0-1 L1-1 L2-1 2 L0-2 L1-2 L2-2 3 L0-3 L1-3 L2-3 4 L0-4 L1-4 L2-4 According to the "reinforced concrete structure design specification"[6], five layers of CFRP is aloud.
1.042 4.2 contrast different layers of Fi=42.52‘s BL1-2／BL1-1 1.016 1.019 1.023 1.026 1.029 1.023 2.3 BL1-3／BL1-2 1.016 1.017 1.020 1.023 1.026 1.020 2.0 BL1-4／BL1-3 1.012 1.015 1.018 1.021 1.023 1.018 1.8 contrast different layers of Fi=63.78 ‘s BL2-2／BL2-1 1.001 1.005 1.010 1.015 1.019 1.010 1.0 BL2-3／BL2-2 1.001 1.004 1.009 1.013 1.016 1.009 0.9 BL2-4／BL2-3 1.001 1.004 1.007 1.011 1.014 1.007 0.7 Note: Stiffness is inversely proportional to deflection under the same load, so, all stiffness calculation by deflection ratio in this paper; BL1-1-BL1-4 is the stiffness of reinforced beams with 1~4 layers of CFRP when Fi=40%Fu.and BL2-1-BL2-4 is the one when Fi=60%Fu.A negative in Table means that the stiffness decrease.
Reference: [1] John Fonacci and Maalej.
Beijing: China Communications Press, 2007:479~485 [8] Zhang Zhaohui.

Fig.1.
Table 1.
The mechanical properties after heat treatment: tensile strength on average is 855 MPa, the yield strength - 479 MPa, elongation - 27% (1,2 curves).
loading step № Stress, MPa Quantity of cycles Result 1 1 210 20х106 not destroyed 2 1 230 2х106 not destroyed 3 1 250 2х106 not destroyed 4 1 270 1,46х106 destroyed 1 2 210 20х106 not destroyed 2 2 230 2х106 not destroyed 3 2 250 2х106 not destroyed 4 2 270 1,31х106 destroyed 1 3 210 20х106 not destroyed 2 3 230 2х106 not destroyed 3 3 250 2х106 not destroyed 4 3 270 1,32х106 destroyed 1 4 210 20х106 not destroyed 2 4 230 2х106 not destroyed 3 4 250 2х106 not destroyed 4 4 270 1,65х106 destroyed 1 5 210 20х106 not destroyed 2 5 230 2х106 not destroyed 3 5 250 2х106 not destroyed 4 5 270 1,62х106 destroyed 1 6 210 20х106 not destroyed 2 6 230 2х106 not destroyed 3 6 250 1,7х106 destroyed Practically all samples (except sample №6) withstood a load of 250 MPa, a breakdown occurred at a load of 270 MPa.
References [1] L.

The material of the pipe bend is SA106 Gr.B and the relevant material properties are shown in Table 1 [12].
Table 2 Parametric study matrix R (in) Do (in) t (in) d/t 2θ/π 2l/Do φ h(=Rt/r2) 5 2.5 0.276 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 1/4, 1/2, 1 1/2, 1, 2 π/6, π/4, π/3 1.12 Results and Discussion As listed in Table 2, three different wall-thinned depths, angles, lengths, bend angles were systematically varied to quantify their effects on the limit pressure and limit moment.
By increasing the wall-thinned depth from 0.25 to 0.75, the limit pressures at φ=π/6 decreased about 10~70% with a variation of the wall-thinned angles (2θ/π=1/4, 1/2, 1).
References [1] ASME: ANSI/ASME B31G (1991)
Vol. 1-B (1952-1953), pp. 465-479