Search results

Fig. 1.
References [1] J.
Shao, China Particuol. 1 (2003) 64-9
Trans. 1 (1988) 31–38
Commun. 195 (2008) 479–491

(a) (b) Figure 1.
The output of Wheatstone bridge (∆V) in Fig. 1(a) could be written as ∆V=R1R3-R2R4VR1+R2R3+R4.
References [1] R.
Actuators B 99 (2004) 474–479
Lett. 98 (2011) 173502-1_173502-3.

Introduction Acetohydroxy Synthase (AHAS) (EC 4.1.3.18), also called acetolactate synthase , is the key enzyme in the biosynthsis of L-valine (Figure 1) and therefore is a potential target for metabolic engineering[1].
Figure 1.
The contents of amino acid in fermentation broth were measured by pre-column derivation method using Agilent 1100; The column temperature was 35℃; The measuring wavelength was 360 nm; The flow rate of mobile phase was 1 mL/min.
Acknowledgement This research is carried out with grants from Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission under the code 08JCZDJC15400 and National High Technology Research References [1] Eliáková V, Pátek M et al.
Acta Microbiologica Sinica of Chinese ,2004,(5): 627-630 [8] Blombach B，Schreiner M E，Bartek T，et al．Corynebacterium glutamicum tailored for high-yield L-valine production［J］．Appl Microbiol Biotechnol，2008，79（3）：471－479.

Introduction With the increasing application of the sensitive data storage and sharing in distributed systems such as online social networks or public cloud storage, there have been increasing requirement and attention to distributed data security in the Internet [1].
In this phase, attribute-based encryption and signature can simultaneously be realized by the sender in the following steps: 1) The sender computes and respectively; 2) The sender computes , where is the current time; 3) The sender computes , and respectively.
Theorem 1: The receiver can correctly decrypt the ciphertext if and hold.
References [1] Y.
“Fully Secure Decentralized Key-Policy Attribute-Based Encryption”, International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, Xi'an, China, 2013, pp. 476-479

Introduction Developed from the study on the behaviors of alloys in the semisolid state pioneered by Spencer et al. [1], it has been well recognized that semisolid processing (SSP) exhibits significant advantages over the traditional material processing techniques, such as good net shape capability, low energy cost, less entrapped air, fine grain size, porosity and segregation [2, 3].
Experimental procedure The main features of MRB process is illustrated schematically in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of the MRB system with a HPDC machine The alloy used in this study was a commercial ADC12 alloy (Table 1) supplied in forms of a direct chill cast ingot.
References [1] M.C.
Scripta Mater. 64 (2011) 479-482

That is, nasal consonant syllables occupy 1 / 10 in 410 common used Monosyllabic in Mandarin.
When pronounce Nasal consonants [m], Men's nasal voice is longer than female’s , comparing with table 1 nasal was followed by vowels [o], [e], [i], the length of nasal is longer,,when it followed by vowels [a], [u] nasal consonant is shorter.
Table 1 Length of nasal consonants m (Initial Consonants Table 1) Unit: seconds length m m-a m-o m-e m-i m-u boys Average 0.83 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.06 Standard deviation 0.13 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.01 girls Average 0.95 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.13 0.06 Standard deviation 0.19 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.01 Table 2 Length of nasal consonants n (Initial Consonants Table 1) Unit: seconds length n n-a n-o n-e n-i n-u n-ü boys average 0.77 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.07 0.06 Standard deviation 0.19 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.01 girls average 0.63 0.1 0.11 0.1 0.11 0.04 0.04 Standard deviation 0.14 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 Figure 3 Boys’ nasal consonant duration charts Figure 4 Girls’ nasal consonant duration charts Above statistics, male’s length of time for single nasal [m] is longer than [n],in the Monosyllabic, male’s length of time for single nasal [n] is longer than [m]. girls’s length of time for single nasal [m] is longer than [n]as well, in the Monosyllabic ,followed
Table 8 Syllable formant frequencies in the nasal consonant F1 F2 F3 ma 273 544 1241 mo 234 483 994 mi 296 545 1015 mu 291 412 871 me 303 520 1031 na 265 536 996 nou 286 479 879 ni 291 459 925 ne 289 534 902 nu 303 491 924 From the Table, the various for F1 F2 F3 when the nasal consonants are followed different vowels.
References [1] Kong Jiangping. voice and diverse multi-modal study of phonetics [J].

Among the wind power generation technology, variable-speed constant-frequency (VSCF) method is the development direction of the wind power technology [1].
The Structure of DFIG Generation System and Operation Principle The structure of DFIG wind power generation system is showed in Fig 1.
Fig.1.
References [1] Li Junjun, Wu Zhengqiu, Tan Xunqiong, Chen Bo.
Research on doubly-fed VSCF wind power generator control system [J], Journal of Shengyang University of Technology, 2003 6 (25) 479-481

The needed bearing capacity of a single component increases, therefore, the requirements for material’s performance become higher [1, 2].
Chemical composition of investigated steel is listed in Table 1, and the sampling positions of metallographic, tensile tests and impact tests are shown in Fig.1.
Table 1 Chemical composition of tested steel (wt. %).
From the numerical analysis, the YS is in the range of 409 to 479 MPa, UTS is 584 to 672 MPa, and the data fluctuation is less than 10%.
References [1] H.J.

The slip interfacial model of a coated system with length L was shown in Fig. 1.
Fig.1 A micro-slip interfacial schematic.
Compared to the interface length, the thickness of the interface region is a negligible quantity (Fig.1), i.e.:.
References [1] H.Y.
Forum, 475～479, 3971(2005) [9] V.R.

The schematic illustration of the sample for directional solidification is shown in Fig. 1.
Φ40 Φ60 A Φ60 Φ30 B Φ20 Φ60 C (a) (b) Fig. 1 (a) Dimensions of the samples of type A, B and C; (b) manufactured shell mould.
From the Equation (1), with the increase of Gibbs free energy, the activation energy of nucleation decreased, and then the nucleation becomes readily.
References [1] M.
Woodford (Eds.), Superalloys, Minerals Metals & Materials Soc, Champion, Pennsylvania, USA, 1996, pp. 471-479