Sort by:
Publication Type:
Open access:
Publication Date:
Periodicals:
Search results
Online since: February 2008
Authors: Qi Kun Wang, Chang Rui Zhang, Hai Feng Hu, Yu Di Zhang, Yong Lian Zhou
Table 1 Mechanical properties and densities of 2D C/MC-SiC samples
Sample* σ [MPa] KIC[MPa-m1/2] ρ [g/cm3] Ablative rate [mm/s]
TaC10 340.4 12.0 1.92 0.029
TaC20 305.7 10.6 2.04 0.040
TaC30 292.8 11.0 2.05 0.059
TaC60 355.2 9.1 2.52 0.040
TaC80 322.5 9.4 2.58 0.052
TaC100 294.5 8.7 2.08 0.041
NbC30 308.8 10.5 - 0.058
NbC100 323.9 9.1 - -
ZrC75 295.0 11.7 2.43 0.026
SiC100 326.3 17.6 1.90 0.088
*Note: The sample number also means MC content (MC/(MC + SiC)) in slurries.
The parameters, including the dispersion of UHTCs in the matrix, the density of the samples, the kind of powder (with different melting point), and grain size of the powder, will influence the ablative behavior in torch test and arc jet test.
The parameters, including the dispersion of UHTCs in the matrix, the density of the samples, the kind of powder (with different melting point), and grain size of the powder, will influence the ablative behavior in torch test and arc jet test.
Online since: August 2014
Authors: Ying Zhi Zhang, Gui Xiang Shen, Yu Xia Xue, Li Quan Guo
Maintainability Modeling of NC Machine Tools based on Repair Time
Yuxia Xue1,a, Guixiang Shen2,b, Yingzhi Zhang2,c and Liquan Guo*1,d
1Key Laboratory of Grain and Oil Processing of Jilin Province, Jilin Business and Technology College, Changchun 130062, China
2College of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130025, China
alace99@126.com, bshengx@jlu.edu.cn, czhangyz@jlu.edu.cn, dguolq948@163.com
Keywords: NC machine tools, Maintainability modeling, Repair time (RT), Lognormal distribution
Abstract.
Eq. 1 can be translated into Eq. 2 via Mellin transformation: . (2) Looking up Mellin transformation formula, we can get Eq. 3 and Eq. 4: . (3) (4) Where, E[*] is mean value; a is a real number and a = 1,2, ..., n; (a) is ath derivative.
Eq. 1 can be translated into Eq. 2 via Mellin transformation: . (2) Looking up Mellin transformation formula, we can get Eq. 3 and Eq. 4: . (3) (4) Where, E[*] is mean value; a is a real number and a = 1,2, ..., n; (a) is ath derivative.
Online since: January 2014
Authors: Jun Ding, Ding Guo, Xiao Jun Zhang, Wen Jie Yuan, Hong Xi Zhu, Cheng Ji Deng
It could be concluded from Fig.2 that Na2CO3 had the reaction with forsterite and formed a large number of Na2MgSiO4.
It turned to be the diffusion mechanism in the medium and the last stage, but bulk diffusion and grain boundary diffusion were all possible.
It turned to be the diffusion mechanism in the medium and the last stage, but bulk diffusion and grain boundary diffusion were all possible.
Online since: May 2012
Authors: Lian Yu Wei, Shi Bin Ma, Hao Li, Jin Liang Zhang
Indoor and outdoor experiment
Combine of Highway asphalt pavement design indicators and parameters for a number of research results, as well as the reality of Tianjin on common basic design parameters of 1 in the table below, pavement design parameters of table 2.
Common basic design parameters recommended Table 1 Material name Mix Compressive modulus(MPa) Splitting strength Cement stabilized crushed stone 4:96 ~5:95 1200~1300 0.55~0.65 Lime-fly-ash stabilized crushed stone 6:14:80 1100-1400 0.60~0.80 Lime-fly-ash soil 10:45:45 550~650 0.2~0.23 Lime-soil 10%~12% 500~600 0.2~0.23 SOAP residue of stabilized soil 25% 250~350 0.2~0.25 Common surface material design parameter recommendations Table2 Material name Material Type Compressivemodulus E(MPa) Splitting strength 20℃ 15℃ Fine dense-graded asphalt concrete AC-13I 1200-1600 1800-2200 1.2-1.6 Medium-grained dense-graded asphalt concrete AC-16I 1000-1400 1600-2000 0.8-1.2 Data Model The total cost of the structure of the unit area as the objective function , design variables ( layers of pavement structure thickness) and the objective function into a linear relationship : (1) —the i-th layer of pavement structure unit thickness per unit area
Common basic design parameters recommended Table 1 Material name Mix Compressive modulus(MPa) Splitting strength Cement stabilized crushed stone 4:96 ~5:95 1200~1300 0.55~0.65 Lime-fly-ash stabilized crushed stone 6:14:80 1100-1400 0.60~0.80 Lime-fly-ash soil 10:45:45 550~650 0.2~0.23 Lime-soil 10%~12% 500~600 0.2~0.23 SOAP residue of stabilized soil 25% 250~350 0.2~0.25 Common surface material design parameter recommendations Table2 Material name Material Type Compressivemodulus E(MPa) Splitting strength 20℃ 15℃ Fine dense-graded asphalt concrete AC-13I 1200-1600 1800-2200 1.2-1.6 Medium-grained dense-graded asphalt concrete AC-16I 1000-1400 1600-2000 0.8-1.2 Data Model The total cost of the structure of the unit area as the objective function , design variables ( layers of pavement structure thickness) and the objective function into a linear relationship : (1) —the i-th layer of pavement structure unit thickness per unit area
Online since: May 2014
Authors: Pavel Cyrus, Josef Nosek, Vaclav Stransky
The results of measurements and other calculated values
non- glazed stainless sheet (Ra = 1,2µm) , load FN = 26 N
number of measurements n = 7
sample
material
The mean
f (1)
Standard deviation
Range f for reliability
p = 95 %
I.
The table contains the results, which were used for the reconstruction of the conveyors in grain silos.
The table contains the results, which were used for the reconstruction of the conveyors in grain silos.
Online since: June 2011
Authors: Masato Enomoto, Kai Ming Wu, Guo Hong Zhang
Then, the influence on nucleation rate can be detected from the change in the particle numbers.
Fig. 4 shows that the number of ferrite particles does increase in the presence of magnetic field [2].
Hence, probably due to this effect the observed particle number decreased at the time of measurement, see Fig. 5, and the particle numbers soon became similar with and without magnetic field [7].
Fig. 4 Ferrite particle number per unit area of grain boundary vs isothermal holding time plots in three Fe-C base alloys [2].
Fig. 5 Ferrite particle number per unit area of grain boundary plotted against holding time in a Fe-0.1C-3Mn alloy [7].
Fig. 4 shows that the number of ferrite particles does increase in the presence of magnetic field [2].
Hence, probably due to this effect the observed particle number decreased at the time of measurement, see Fig. 5, and the particle numbers soon became similar with and without magnetic field [7].
Fig. 4 Ferrite particle number per unit area of grain boundary vs isothermal holding time plots in three Fe-C base alloys [2].
Fig. 5 Ferrite particle number per unit area of grain boundary plotted against holding time in a Fe-0.1C-3Mn alloy [7].