A Coupled Model of Two-Phase Diffusion and Flow through Deforming Porous Cosserat Media

Abstract:

Simulation of mining induced rock deformation, rock fracture enhanced permeability and fluid and gas diffusion and flow process is a complex task. A new three dimensional coupled mechanical two-phase double porosity desorption and diffusion finite element code called COSFLOW has been recently developed by CSIRO Exploration and Mining to service the mining industry’s need. A unique feature of COSFLOW is the incorporation of Cosserat continuum theory in its formulation. In the Cosserat model, inter-layer interfaces (joints, bedding planes) are considered to be smeared across the mass, i.e. the effects of interfaces are incorporated implicitly in the choice of stress-strain model formulation. An important feature of the Cosserat model is that it incorporates bending rigidity of individual layers in its formulation and this makes it different from other conventional implicit models. The Cosserat continuum formulation has a major advantage over conventional continuum models in that it can efficiently simulate rock breakage and slip as well as separation along the bedding planes. Any opening/closure along a bedding plane may introduce a strong anisotropy in fluid flow properties of the porous medium. This, in turn, will impact on the fluid/gas flow behaviour of the porous medium. This paper will briefly describe the Cosserat continuum theory, the treatment of permeability changes with rock deformation and the coupling of the two-phase dual porosity fluid diffusion- flow model and present a number of examples highlighting the capability of the developed code in simulating the mining induced rock deformation, permeability changes and fluid diffusion and flow will be presented.

• Periodical: Defect and Diffusion Forum (Volumes 297-301)
• Pages: 281-293
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.297-301.281
• Online since: April 2010
• Authors: Deepak P. Adhikary, Hua Guo
• Keywords: Coalmining, COSFLOW, Cosserat, Finite Element Model (FEM), Gas, Two-Phase Flow, Water

References

[1] I.M. Lifshitz and L.N. Rosenzweig: JETP, Vol. 16 (11), and Letter to the editor. On the theory of elastic polycrystals. JETP Vol. 21 (1946). p.214.

[2] M.D.G. Salamon: Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. and Geomech. Abstr. Vol. 5 (1968), p.519.

[3] C.M. Gerrard: Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. and Geomech. Abstr. Vol. 19 (1982), p.15.

[4] O.C. Zienkiewicz and G.N. Pande: Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. Vol. 1 (1977), p.219.

[5] C.M. Gerrard and G.N. Pande: Computer and Geotechnics Vol. 1 (1985), p.293.

[6] H. Alehossein and J.P. Carter: On the implicit and explicit inclusion of joints in the analysis of rock masses. Mechanics of Jointed and Faulted Rocks, ed. Rossmanith, Balkema, Rotterdam, (1990), pp.487-494.

DOI: 10.1201/9781003078975-68

[7] D.P. Adhikary and H. Guo: Rock Mech. Rock Eng. Vol. 35 (2002), p.161.

[8] D.P. Adhikary and A.V. Dyskin: Computers and Geotechnics Vol 20 (1997), p.15.

[9] D.P. Adhikary and A.V. Dyskin: Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. Vol. 22 (1998), p.245.

[10] G.R. King and T.M. Ertekin: A survey of mathematical models related to methane production from coal seams, Part I - empirical & equilibrium sorption models. International Coalbed Methane Symposium, (1989), pp.125-138.

[11] G.R. King and T.M. Ertekin: A survey of mathematical models related to methane production from coal seams, Part II - non-equilibrium sorption models. International Coalbed Methane Symposium, (1989), pp.139-155.

[12] G.R. King and T.M. Ertekin: State-of-the-art modelling for unconventional gas recovery. SPE Formation Evaluation, Vol. 1 (1991), pp.63-71.

DOI: 10.2118/18947-pa

[13] G.R. King and T.M. Ertekin: A survey of mathematical models related to methane production for coal seams, Part III - recent developments (1989-1994). Proc. of the International Coalbed Methane Extraction Conference, (1994), pp.124-128.

[14] G.R. King and T.M. Ertekin: State-of-the-art modelling for unconventional gas recovery, Part II - recent developments (1989-1994). SPE papers 29575, Rocky Mountain Region Low Permeability Reservoir Symposium and Exhibition, (1995), pp.173-191.

DOI: 10.2118/29575-ms

[15] I. Langmuir: J. American Chemical Society Vol. 38 (1916), p.2221.

[16] D.M. Smith and F.L. Williams: SPE Journal Vol. 1 (1984), p.529.

[17] J. Kolesar and T.M. Ertekin: The unsteady-state nature of sorption and diffusion phenomena in the micropore structure of coal. SPE Unconventional Gas Technology Symposium, Kentucky, (1986), pp.289-314.

DOI: 10.2118/19398-pa

[18] F.C. Schwerer: Development of coal-gas production simulators and mathematical models for well-test strategies. Gas Research Institute Final Report No. GRI - 84/0060, Chicago, Illinois (1984).

[19] J. Kozeny and S. Ber: Wiener Akad, Abt. Vol. 2a, (1927), p.136.

[20] W.C. Krumbein and G.D. Monk: Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Petrol. Engng. Vol. (151) (1943), p.153.

[21] De Wiest (ed. ): Flow through porous media. Academic Press, London, (1969), p.530.

[22] M. Bai and D. Elsworth: Rock Mech. Rock Engng. Vol 27 (1994), p.209.

[23] R. Seedman: A review of the hydrogeological aspects of Australian longwalls. Symp. On Geology in Longwall Mining, November 12-13 (1996), pp.269-272.

[24] C. Louis: Groundwater flow in rock masses and its influence on stability. Rock Mech. Res. Report 10, Imperial College, UK (1969).

[25] D. Elsworth: Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. Vol 26 (1989), p.329.

[26] J. Liu and D. Elsworth: Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Vol 34 (1997), p.1139.