Search Options

Sort by:

Sort search results by

Publication Type:

Publication Type filter

Open access:

Publication Date:

Periodicals:

Periodicals filter

Search results

Online since: March 2012
Authors: Pichet Limsuwan, Ekachai Hoonnivathana, Piyapong Pankaew, Suraida Basosidik, Kittisakchai Naemchanthara
Vol. 81 (2010), p. 892–896 [5] M.
Online since: December 2013
Authors: Katarína Minarovičová, Rastislav Menďan
Structural system Beginning of construction Number of flats Number of flats in % Row apartment houses Max. number of storeys Apartment block Max. number of storeys B-70 1975 42 137 6,5 * 8 * 8 BA 1955 9 710 1,5 * 7 * 12 BA-BC 1972 20 304 3,1 BA-NKS 1975 33 645 5,2 * 8 * 12 G 57 1958 5 649 0,9 * 6 - - LB (MB) 1958 20 588 3,2 * 10 * 10 MS 5 1962 3 672 0,6 * 5 - - MS 11 1962 2 529 0,4 - - * 11 P 1.14 1975 75 690 11,7 * 8 * 12 P 1.15 1980 64 746 10,0 * 8 * 12 PS-82 PP 1975 9 241 1,4 * 9 * 14 PS-82 TT 1982 18 616 2,9 * 9 * 14 T 06B BA 1964 11 374 1,8 * 8 * 8 T 06B BB 1963 39 948 6,2 * 6 * 9 T 06B KE 1963 80 481 12,5 * 8 * 13 T 06B NA 1970 84 818 13,2 * 8 * 8 T 06B ZA 1964 55 118 8,5 * 8 * 13 T 08B 1963 22 896 3,6 * 9 - - ZT 1966 8 693 1,3 * 8 - - ZTB 1972 21 317 3,3 * 8 * 13 other 13 819 2,1 overall 644 937 100,0 Note: In the case of BA and U65 systems row apartment houses were evaluated and in the case of ZTB system the plate layout house was evaluated.
Online since: June 2010
Authors: Wei Chen, Long Fei Li, Zu Qing Sun, Wang Yue Yang
Process Steel Lα [µm] dgb [µm] dgi [µm] YS [MPa] UTS [MPa] EL [%] By slow cooling A interlamellar spacing 0.32±0.06 471 915 8.1 B interlamellar spacing 0.27±0.05 596 1029 9.0 By HD A 0.58±0.16 0.21±0.16 0.11±0.02 870 1080 8.3 B 0.45±0.12 0.13±0.04 0.07±0.01 1097 1262 5.9 By HD+SA for 20min A 0.89±0.25 0.32±0.09 0.10±0.03 773 896 12.8 B 0.63±0.18 0.20±0.06 0.09±0.02 861 1002 10.8 By HD+SA for 60min A 1.16±0.36 0.39±0.14 0.11±0.03 696 823 13.3 B 0.84±0.34 0.31±0.10 0.13±0.03 761 902 14.9 HD- hot deformation of undercooled austenite, SA-subsequent annealing, Lα-average grain size of ferrite, dgb- average θ particle size at grain boundaries of ferrite, dgi- average θ particle size in ferrite grains.
Online since: November 2011
Authors: Ke Wang, Xin Feng, Xing Wei Sun, He Wang
The maximal stress is 896.185Mpa and the biggest displacement is 0.131849mm.
Online since: May 2012
Authors: Christian Brylinski, Gabriel Ferro, Véronique Soulière, Pierre Brosselard, Mihai Lazar, Dominique Tournier, Davy Carole, Stéphane Berckmans, Arthur Vo-Ha, Laurent Auvray
Chem. 28 (2004) 889–896
Online since: August 2011
Authors: Joerg Pezoldt, Richard Nader
Phys. 50 (1979) 896 - 898
Online since: August 2015
Authors: Bandriyana Bandriyana, A.K. Rivai, J.H. Prajitno, A. Dimyati
Research, Vol. 896 (2014) 617-620
Online since: April 2009
Authors: John E. Barnes, William Peter, Craig A. Blue
Consolidation Heat Treat Ftu (MPa) Fty (MPa) EI (%) PIF As PIFed, Sub transus 945 862 15 PIF As PIFed, Super transus 951 841 16 PIF Super Transus PIF + Beta Anneal 972 883 17 PIF Super Transus PIF + Rolled + Beta Anneal 972 855 17 VHP Sub Transus Forge + Beta Anneal 945 862 15 VHP Super Transus Forge only 965 848 16 AM S4911 Mill Anneal Plate 896 827 10 AM 24928 Mill Annual Forging 931 862 10 The tensile properties were on par with our expectations.
Online since: March 2016
Authors: Nafisah Osman, Nurul Wahida Othman, Azliana Ramli, Suhaida Dila Safian
Advanced Materials Research, 896(3),112–115
Online since: December 2010
Authors: Zhong Feng Zhang, Wan Xi Peng, Jing Hao Li, Xian Yan Zhou
Analysis of gluing property The maximum failure load tested by the mechanical testing machine and the bonding strength list as follows :( The failure of the glue-line in boiling water recorded zero) Specimen No The groups No.1 maximum failure(N) No.2 maximum failure(N) No.3 maximum failure(N) The average bonding strength(Mpa) 1 0 0 0 0 2 354.5 633 439 0.958 3 190 180 323 0.475 4 1020 583 79.5 1.146 5 966 579 941 1.638 6 0 0 0 0 7 1154 1316 1144 2.335 8 0 0 1035 2.08 9 1076 1560 2188 3.287 10 273 270 314 0.555 11 101 868.5 285 0.843 12 360 184 275 0.551 13 709.5 375 418 1.018 14 910 896 910 1.836 Table 2.