Sort by:
Publication Type:
Open access:
Publication Date:
Periodicals:
Search results
Online since: September 2011
Authors: Da Wei Xun, Chang Jie Luo, Kai He, Ruxu Du
Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 show the 3-D model of gantry and cantilever type machine respectively.
References [1] Shao Zhongxi, Fu Hongya, Li Decai.
Fiber Placement Cincinnati Machine. 2002: 477~479 [4] Grant C G.
Espana: WO/2006/021601. 2006, (03): 1~31 [6] Kurt Schueler, James Miller, Richard Hale.
US Patent: 5110395. 1992.5:1~6
References [1] Shao Zhongxi, Fu Hongya, Li Decai.
Fiber Placement Cincinnati Machine. 2002: 477~479 [4] Grant C G.
Espana: WO/2006/021601. 2006, (03): 1~31 [6] Kurt Schueler, James Miller, Richard Hale.
US Patent: 5110395. 1992.5:1~6
Online since: August 2011
Authors: De Yi Huang, Lei Zi Jiao, Xue Mei Cao, Xi Han, Ming Fu Zhao
For example, the relationship between the receiving of light energy and the biomass concentration has been researched [1], and A.
Fig. 1 The structure of single-end etched FBG sensor Due to the FBG is sensitive to temperature changes, so the FBG etched region is sensitive to refractive index and temperature changes.
Experiment and discussion Fabrication of the sensor In the experiments, the structure parameters of the single-end etched FBG are shown in Tab.1 Table.1 The structure parameters of the single-end etched FBG parameter λB (nm) L (mm) LUN (mm) LET (mm) Deh (µm) DCO (µm) Dcl (µm) value 1550.2 5.00 3.00 2.00 10.5 8.00 117 The fabrication of the single-end etched FBG experimental setup was shown in Fig.2.
References [1] Zhao mingfu, Liao qiang, Chen yan.
Optics and Precision Engineering, 2007, 15(4):479-485 [2] Iadicicco, S.
Fig. 1 The structure of single-end etched FBG sensor Due to the FBG is sensitive to temperature changes, so the FBG etched region is sensitive to refractive index and temperature changes.
Experiment and discussion Fabrication of the sensor In the experiments, the structure parameters of the single-end etched FBG are shown in Tab.1 Table.1 The structure parameters of the single-end etched FBG parameter λB (nm) L (mm) LUN (mm) LET (mm) Deh (µm) DCO (µm) Dcl (µm) value 1550.2 5.00 3.00 2.00 10.5 8.00 117 The fabrication of the single-end etched FBG experimental setup was shown in Fig.2.
References [1] Zhao mingfu, Liao qiang, Chen yan.
Optics and Precision Engineering, 2007, 15(4):479-485 [2] Iadicicco, S.
Online since: January 2007
Authors: Pee Yew Lee, Chih Feng Hsu
Results and Discussion
The XRD patterns of the elemental powder mixture with a composition Ti50Cu28Ni15Sn7 after
milling for 8h are shown in Fig. 1 (a).
In the case of the composite powders, as seen in Figs. 1(b), no diffraction peaks of crystalline CNT can be detected in the XRD patterns for the composite powders of Ti50Cu28Ni15Sn7 alloy mixed with 4 vol. % CNT after 8h of milling.
Though not shown here, consolidated BMG Ti50Cu28Ni15Sn7 and composite samples exhibited similar XRD and DSC results as those of the corresponding powders shown in Figs. 1 (XRD) and 2 (DSC).
References [1] Inoue A.
Mater Sci Forum 2005; 475-479: 3443
In the case of the composite powders, as seen in Figs. 1(b), no diffraction peaks of crystalline CNT can be detected in the XRD patterns for the composite powders of Ti50Cu28Ni15Sn7 alloy mixed with 4 vol. % CNT after 8h of milling.
Though not shown here, consolidated BMG Ti50Cu28Ni15Sn7 and composite samples exhibited similar XRD and DSC results as those of the corresponding powders shown in Figs. 1 (XRD) and 2 (DSC).
References [1] Inoue A.
Mater Sci Forum 2005; 475-479: 3443
Online since: March 2014
Authors: Su Bing Liu, Da Zhi Cao, Zhi Hui Zhao
Introduction
In recent years, several methods[1-3] has introduced to integrate the 3D finite element into the dynamics analysis of Multibody system.
Fig. 1 The dynamic model of the diesel engine For the engine model, the piston, link, flywheel and propeller are simplified as rigid bodies.
The consumed CPU time are listed in Table. 1.
References [1] L.
Cao, et al., "The 3D Incompatible Element Modeling of Flexible Body in Multibody System Dynamics," Advanced Materials Research, vol. 479-481, pp. 818-824, 2012
Fig. 1 The dynamic model of the diesel engine For the engine model, the piston, link, flywheel and propeller are simplified as rigid bodies.
The consumed CPU time are listed in Table. 1.
References [1] L.
Cao, et al., "The 3D Incompatible Element Modeling of Flexible Body in Multibody System Dynamics," Advanced Materials Research, vol. 479-481, pp. 818-824, 2012
Online since: October 2006
Authors: Jing Feng Li, Huai Quan Zhang
Functionally Graded Electrode Materials for Thermoelectric Devices
Jing-Feng Li 1,a and Huaiquan Zhang
2,b
1,2
State Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, Department of Materials Science
and Engineering, Tsinghua University, 100084, Beijing, P.
One well-known example of thermoelectric applications is the radioisotope thermoelectric generators (TEG) that provide electrical power to spacecrafts [1].
Fig.1 Schematic illustrations of two types of thermoelectric devices and their electrodes.
Cu Cu Cu+AlN AlN AlN Cu+AlN Cu Cu+AlN References [1] G.
Forum, 475-479 (2005), 1555
One well-known example of thermoelectric applications is the radioisotope thermoelectric generators (TEG) that provide electrical power to spacecrafts [1].
Fig.1 Schematic illustrations of two types of thermoelectric devices and their electrodes.
Cu Cu Cu+AlN AlN AlN Cu+AlN Cu Cu+AlN References [1] G.
Forum, 475-479 (2005), 1555
Online since: July 2015
Authors: I. Wayan Sukania, Agustinus Purna Irawan
The data fibers and treatment are carried out as shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
The position of the samples and the process of tensile testing as shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
References [1] J.
Table 1.
The position of the samples and the process of tensile testing as shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
References [1] J.
Online since: February 2011
Authors: Bo Wen Wang, Wen Mei Huang, Ling Weng, Yu Fa Yi, Yan Ming Hao
Introduction
Giant magnetostrictive Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe2 alloy can be used as actuators, transducers and sensors because of its large magnetostriction, higher energy density and larger output force.[1] Reference [2] has reported that the magnetostriction of <110> axial alignment rod sample reaches 1600×10-6 at the magnetic field of 40 kA/m and under a compressive stress of 15 MPa.
Fig.1 shows the X-ray diffraction pattern from the transverse section of directional solidified rod.
Fig.1 X-ray diffraction pattern of transverse section Fig.2 Stress vs. strain without the magnetic field for Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe2 oriented alloy for Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe2 oriented alloy The variation of strain with stress along a <100> direction for Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe2 oriented alloy without the magnetic field is shown in Fig.2.
References [1] A.G.
Forum Vol. 475-479 (2005), p.2251 [3] M.
Fig.1 shows the X-ray diffraction pattern from the transverse section of directional solidified rod.
Fig.1 X-ray diffraction pattern of transverse section Fig.2 Stress vs. strain without the magnetic field for Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe2 oriented alloy for Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe2 oriented alloy The variation of strain with stress along a <100> direction for Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe2 oriented alloy without the magnetic field is shown in Fig.2.
References [1] A.G.
Forum Vol. 475-479 (2005), p.2251 [3] M.
Online since: June 2010
Authors: Shingo Kurosu, Hiroaki Matsumoto, Akihiko Chiba, Yun Ping Li
After the subsequent hot compression at condition at 1273 K and
strain rate less than 1 s-1, and 1223 K and strain rate less than 10 s-1, ultra fine grains less than 1 µm
with residual M2N were obtained.
Particularly, the deformed condition at 1273 K and strain rate less than 1 s-1, and 1223 K and strain rate less than 10 s-1 can exhibit ultra fine grains (less than 1 µm).
The ultra-fine grains (less than 1 µm) were obtained under deformed condition at 1273 K and strain rate less than 1 s-1, and 1223 K and strain rate less than 10 s-1.
References [1] A.Chiba, K.
Forum, Vol. 475-479 (2005), p. 2317 [2] G.
Particularly, the deformed condition at 1273 K and strain rate less than 1 s-1, and 1223 K and strain rate less than 10 s-1 can exhibit ultra fine grains (less than 1 µm).
The ultra-fine grains (less than 1 µm) were obtained under deformed condition at 1273 K and strain rate less than 1 s-1, and 1223 K and strain rate less than 10 s-1.
References [1] A.Chiba, K.
Forum, Vol. 475-479 (2005), p. 2317 [2] G.
Online since: September 2011
Authors: Yuan Tian, Li Min Liang, Wen Cheng Wu, Qiu Yan Hao, Cai Chi Liu
Results and Discussion
Figure 1 shows a plan-view SEM image of sample A etched by KOH aqueous solution (m(KOH):m(H2O)=1:1) at 50℃ for 40 min.
There are few etch pits in Fig.1.
Fig.1 SEM image of Sample A etched by KOH Fig.2 SEM image of Sample B etched by KOH aqueous solution (m(KOH):m(H2O)=1:1) aqueous solution (m(KOH):m(H2O)=1:1) at 50℃ for 40 min.
References [1] S.
Ni, Observation of dislocation etch pits in GaN epilayers by atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, Chinese Journal of Semiconductors. 28 (2007) 473-479.
There are few etch pits in Fig.1.
Fig.1 SEM image of Sample A etched by KOH Fig.2 SEM image of Sample B etched by KOH aqueous solution (m(KOH):m(H2O)=1:1) aqueous solution (m(KOH):m(H2O)=1:1) at 50℃ for 40 min.
References [1] S.
Ni, Observation of dislocation etch pits in GaN epilayers by atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, Chinese Journal of Semiconductors. 28 (2007) 473-479.
Online since: January 2004
Authors: S. Popović, B. Gržeta, D. Medaković
Greta
1, D.
Sample Description of sample Rp Rwp a (Å) c (Å) c/a V (Å3 ) Calcitea 4.9896(2) 17.061(11) 3.419 367.85(5) A1 Primary spines 0.066 0.103 4.9808(1) 17.0133(6) 3.416 365.5(1) A2 Secondary spines 0.064 0.088 4.9732(1) 16.9912(6) 3.416 363.9(1) A3 Part of skeleton without spines 0.063 0.090 4.9700(1) 16.9804(6) 3.416 363.2(1) A4 Inside skeleton around teeth 0.054 0.068 4.9684(1) 16.9709(4) 3.416 362.8(1) A5 Internal teeth 0.072 0.095 4.9654(1) 16.9606(7) 3.416 362.1(1) Magnesite b 4.6328(1) 15.0129(5) 3.240 279.05(3) a, b Data from Effenberger, Mereiter and Zemann [11].
Fig. 1.
References [1] K.M.
PlazoniP: Marine Biology 122 (1995) 479
Sample Description of sample Rp Rwp a (Å) c (Å) c/a V (Å3 ) Calcitea 4.9896(2) 17.061(11) 3.419 367.85(5) A1 Primary spines 0.066 0.103 4.9808(1) 17.0133(6) 3.416 365.5(1) A2 Secondary spines 0.064 0.088 4.9732(1) 16.9912(6) 3.416 363.9(1) A3 Part of skeleton without spines 0.063 0.090 4.9700(1) 16.9804(6) 3.416 363.2(1) A4 Inside skeleton around teeth 0.054 0.068 4.9684(1) 16.9709(4) 3.416 362.8(1) A5 Internal teeth 0.072 0.095 4.9654(1) 16.9606(7) 3.416 362.1(1) Magnesite b 4.6328(1) 15.0129(5) 3.240 279.05(3) a, b Data from Effenberger, Mereiter and Zemann [11].
Fig. 1.
References [1] K.M.
PlazoniP: Marine Biology 122 (1995) 479