A Review on Chemical Mechanical Planarization of Barrier Layer Metals

Article Preview

Abstract:

Chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) is recognized to be one of the finest polishing techniques which provides a smooth and globally planarized metal surface in the field of semiconductor device manufacturing. This process aids in material removal followed with a well finished and planarized surface by a combination of both chemical and mechanical action imparted by oxidizer and abrasive particle respectively. Semiconductor device manufacturing process is an amalgamation of two sub processes i.e. front end of line (FEOL) and back end of line (BEOL). The whole process consists of different segments comprising of several types of material that need to be planarized. The slurry components play an imperative role in metal CMP. It comprises abrasive, oxidizer, and several additives such as complexing agent, corrosion inhibitor, pH adjustor, slurry stabilizer, etc. and each imparts diverse impact on the material needs to be polished. One of the main topics of concern in this area is the removal rate selectivity of interconnects metal to the barrier layer metal. Thus, the reported review work efforts to emphasize the planarization of barrier layer materials, the various key ingredients employed in metal CMP and removal rate selectivity between interconnects and barrier layer metal.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

171-180

Citation:

Online since:

April 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Krishnan, J.W. Nalaskowski, L.M. Cook, Chemical mechanical planarization: slurry chemistry, materials, and mechanisms, Chem. Rev. 110 (2010) 178-204.

DOI: 10.1021/cr900170z

Google Scholar

[2] P. B. Zantye, A. Kumar, A. K. Sikder, Chemical mechanical planarization for microelectronics applications. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, 45(3-6) (2004) 89-220.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mser.2004.06.002

Google Scholar

[3] J. W. Mayer, S. S. Lau, Electronic materials science: for integrated circuits in Si and GaAs, Macmillan, New York, (1990).

Google Scholar

[4] J.G. Ryan, R.M. Geffken, N.R. Poulin, J.R. Paraszczak, The evolution of interconnection technology at IBM, IBM J. Res. Dev. 39 (1995) 371-381.

DOI: 10.1147/rd.394.0371

Google Scholar

[5] R.J. Baker, CMOS: circuit design, layout, and simulation, John Wiley & Sons, (2019).

Google Scholar

[6] M. Rovitto, Electromigration Reliability Issue in Interconnects for Three-Dimensional Integration Technologies, PhD dissertation, (2016).

Google Scholar

[7] L.F. Thompson, R.E. Kerwin, Polymer resist systems for photo-and electron lithography, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 6 (1976) 267-301.

DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ms.06.080176.001411

Google Scholar

[8] E.N. Shauly, Physical, electrical, and reliability considerations for copper BEOL layout design rules, J. Low Power Elec. Appl. 8 (2018) 20.

DOI: 10.3390/jlpea8020020

Google Scholar

[9] W. Kern, K. Reinhardt, Handbook of Silicon Wafer Cleaning Technology, William Andrew, (2018).

Google Scholar

[10] L. Hu, G. Pan, C. Li, X. Zhang, J. Liu, P. He, C. Wang, Potassium tartrate as a complexing agent for chemical mechanical polishing of Cu/Co/TaN barrier liner stack in H2O2 based alkaline slurries, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process, 108 (2020) 104883.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2019.104883

Google Scholar

[11] B. Li, T. D. Sullivan, T. C. Lee, D. Badami, Reliability challenges for copper interconnects, Microelectron Reliab, 44(3) (2004) 365-380.

DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2003.11.004

Google Scholar

[12] Y.D. Shacham, Barrier layers for Cu ULSI metallization. J. Electron. Mater. 30 (2001) 336-344.

DOI: 10.1007/s11664-001-0040-0

Google Scholar

[13] X.P. Qu, H. Lu, T. Peng, G.P. Ru, B.Z. Li, Effects of pre-annealing on the diffusion barrier properties for ultrathin W–Si–N thin film, Thin Solid Films, 462 (2004) 67-71.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.05.023

Google Scholar

[14] R. Bernasconi, L. Magagnin, Ruthenium as Diffusion Barrier Layer in Electronic Interconnects: Current Literature with a Focus on Electrochemical Deposition Methods, J. Electrochem. Soc. 166 (2018), 3219.

DOI: 10.1149/2.0281901jes

Google Scholar

[15] P.C. Andricacos, C. Uzoh, J.O. Dukovic, J. Horkans, H. Deligianni, Damascene copper electroplating for chip interconnections. IBM J. Res. Dev. 42 (1998) 567-574.

DOI: 10.1147/rd.425.0567

Google Scholar

[16] J. Seo, U. Paik, Preparation and characterization of slurry for chemical mechanical planarization (CMP). Advances in Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP) (pp.273-298). Woodhead Publishing, (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100165-3.00011-5

Google Scholar

[17] M.S. Moinpour, A. Tregub, J. Sorooshian, A. Oehler, R. Golzarian, A. Rawat, A. Miller, P. Fischer, D. Feller, K. Cadien, Challenges in CMP consumables characterization. In Clarkson University CAMP 6th International Symposium on CMP, Lake Placid, NY, 2001, August.

DOI: 10.1557/mrs2002.247

Google Scholar

[18] G.B. Basim, B.M. Moudgil, Slurry design for chemical mechanical polishing. Kona Powder Part J. 21 (2003) 178-184.

DOI: 10.14356/kona.2003020

Google Scholar

[19] N.H. Kim, J.H. Lim, S.Y. Kim, E.G. Chang, Effects of phosphoric acid stabilizer on copper and tantalum nitride CMP, Mater. Lett. 57 (2003) 4601-4604.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-577x(03)00368-9

Google Scholar

[20] A. Vijayakumar, T. Du, K.B. Sundaram, K.B. V. Desai, Polishing mechanism of tantalum films by SiO2 particles, Microelectron. Eng. 70 (2003) 93-101.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9317(03)00398-8

Google Scholar

[21] S.V.S.B. Janjam, S. Peddeti, D. Roy, S.V. Babu, Tartaric acid as a complexing agent for selective removal of tantalum and copper in CMP, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 11 (2008) 327.

DOI: 10.1149/1.2980345

Google Scholar

[22] F. Altaf, R. Qureshi, S. Ahmed, A.Y. Khan, A. Naseer, Electrochemical adsorption studies of urea on copper surface in alkaline medium, J. Electroanal. Chem. 642 (2010) 98-101.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2010.02.011

Google Scholar

[23] R. Carpio, J. Farkas, R. Jairath, Initial study on copper CMP slurry chemistries. Thin Solid Films, 266(2) (1995) 238-244.

DOI: 10.1016/0040-6090(95)06649-7

Google Scholar

[24] M. Hariharaputhiran, S. Ramarajan, Y. Li, S.V. Babu, Mechanism of Cu removal during CMP in H2O2-glycine based slurries, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. (1999) 566.

DOI: 10.1557/proc-566-129

Google Scholar

[25] S. Deshpande, S.C. Kuiry, M. Klimov, Y. Obeng, S. Seal, Chemical mechanical planarization of copper: role of oxidants and inhibitors, J. Electrochem. Soc. 151 (2004) 788.

DOI: 10.1149/1.1806395

Google Scholar

[26] V.R. Gorantla, A. Babel, S. Pandija, S.V. Babu, Oxalic acid as a complexing agent in CMP slurries for copper, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 8 (2005) 131.

DOI: 10.1149/1.1883873

Google Scholar

[27] T. Ma, B. Tan, Y. Xu, D. Yin, G. Liu, N. Zeng, G. Song, Z. Kao, Y. Liu, Corrosion control of copper wiring by barrier CMP slurry containing azole inhibitor: combination of simulation and experiment, Colloids Surf. 20 (2020) 124872.

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124872

Google Scholar

[28] T.C. Hu, S. Chiu, B.T. Dai, M.S. Tsai, I.C. Tung, M.S. Feng, Nitric acid-based slurry with citric acid as an inhibitor for copper chemical mechanical polishing, Mater. Chem. Phys. 61 (1999) 169-171.

DOI: 10.1016/s0254-0584(99)00138-8

Google Scholar

[29] Y.H. Chen, T.H. Tsai, S.C. Yen, Acetic acid and phosphoric acid adding to improve tantalum chemical mechanical polishing in hydrogen peroxide-based slurry, Microelectron. Eng. 87 (2010) 174-179.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2009.07.009

Google Scholar

[30] Y. Li, M. Hariharaputhiran, S.V. Babu, Chemical-mechanical polishing of copper and tantalum with silica abrasives, Mater. Res. 16 (2001) 1066-1073.

DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2001.0148

Google Scholar

[31] Y. Li, S.V. Babu, Chemical mechanical polishing of copper and tantalum in potassium iodate-based slurries, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 4 (2001) 20.

DOI: 10.1149/1.1342185

Google Scholar

[32] Z. Lu, S.H. Lee, S.V. Babu, E. Matijević, The use of monodispersed colloids in the polishing of copper and tantalum, Colloid Interface Sci. 261 (2003) 55-64.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9797(02)00166-2

Google Scholar

[33] J.C. Chen, W.T. Tsai, Chemical–mechanical polishing behavior of tantalum in slurries containing citric acid and alumina. Surf. Coat. Technol. 185 (2004) 50-57.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2003.12.025

Google Scholar

[34] V. R. Gorantla, E. Matijević, S.V. Babu, Amino acids as complexing agents in chemical− mechanical planarization of copper. Chem. Mater. 17 (2005) 2076-2080.

DOI: 10.1021/cm048478f

Google Scholar

[35] I.K. Kim, Y.J. Kang, T.Y. Kwon, B.G. Cho, J.G. Park, J.Y. Park, H.S. Park, Effect of sodium periodate in alumina-based slurry on Ru CMP for metal-insulator-metal capacitor, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 11 (2008) 150.

DOI: 10.1149/1.2901544

Google Scholar

[36] J. Cheng, T. Wang, L. Jiang, X. Lu, Surface characteristics of ruthenium in periodate-based slurry during chemical mechanical polishing, Appl. Surf. Sci. 351 (2015) 401-409.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.150

Google Scholar

[37] S.N. Victoria, P.P. Sharma, I.I. Suni, S. Ramanathan, Potassium bromate as an oxidizing agent in a titania-based Ru CMP slurry, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 13 (2010) 385.

DOI: 10.1149/1.3481948

Google Scholar

[38] Y. Du, C. Wang, J. Zhou, W. Zhang, J. Ji, L. Han, Y. Li, Effect of guanidinium ions on ruthenium CMP in H2O2 based slurry. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 6(8) (2017) 521.

DOI: 10.1149/2.0131708jss

Google Scholar

[39] Z. Wang, J. Zhou, C. Wang, J. Zhang, Q. Wang, R. Wang, Role of ammonium ions in colloidal silica slurries for Ru CMP. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 8(4) (2019) 285.

DOI: 10.1149/2.0171904jss

Google Scholar

[40] R. Popuri, K.V. Sagi, S.R. Alety, B.C. Peethala, H. Amanapu, R. Patlolla, S.V. Babu, Citric acid as a complexing agent in chemical mechanical polishing slurries for cobalt films for interconnect applications, ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 6(2017) 594.

DOI: 10.1149/2.0111709jss

Google Scholar

[41] L. Hu, G. Pan, Y. Xu, H. Wang, Y. Zhang, R. Wang, C. Wang, The effect of hydroxyethylidene diphosphonic acid on the chemical mechanical polishing of cobalt in H2O2 based alkaline slurries, ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 9(3) (2020) 034007.

DOI: 10.1149/2162-8777/ab80b2

Google Scholar

[42] Z. Wang, M. Sun, X, Niu, J. Zhou, Y. Cui, C. Yang, Z. Huo, W. Zhou, F. Meng, Effect of cystine in alkaline CMP slurry on controlling the galvanic corrosion at Al-Co interface, ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 8(10) (2019) 580.

DOI: 10.1149/2.0071910jss

Google Scholar

[43] I.K. Kim, B.G. Cho, J.G. Park, J.Y. Park, H.S. Park, Effect of pH in Ru slurry with sodium periodate on Ru CMP, J. Electrochem. Soc. 156 (2009) 188.

DOI: 10.1149/1.3058594

Google Scholar

[44] J. Ji, G. Pan, W. Zhang, Y. Du, P He, Y, C. Tian, Wang, Role of additive in alkaline slurries for Co CMP, ECS J. Solid-State Sci. Technol. 6 (12) (2017) 813.

DOI: 10.1149/2.0111712jss

Google Scholar

[45] C. Wang, J. Gao, J. Tian, X. Niu, Y. Liu, Chemical mechanical planarization of barrier layers by using a weakly alkaline slurry, Microelectron. Eng. 108 (2013) 71-75.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2013.04.001

Google Scholar

[46] V. R. K. Gorantla, S. B. Emery, S. Pandija, S. V. Babu, D. Roy, Chemical effects in chemical mechanical planarization of TaN: Investigation of surface reactions in a peroxide-based alkaline slurry using Fourier transform impedance spectroscopy. Mater. Lett., 59(6) (2005) 690-693.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2004.11.010

Google Scholar

[47] A. Jindal, Y. Li, S.V. Babu, Effect of pH on chemical-mechanical polishing of copper and tantalum. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 671 (2001) M.6.8.1.

DOI: 10.1557/proc-671-m6.8

Google Scholar

[48] A. Vijayakumar, T. Du, K.B. Sundaram, V. Desai, Selectivity studies on tantalum barrier layer in copper CMP, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. (2003) 767.

DOI: 10.1557/proc-767-f6.3

Google Scholar

[49] S. Li, U.S. Patent 0,016,784 (2008).

Google Scholar

[50] V. B. Kaufman, R. C. Kistler and S. Wang, U.S. Patent 6,063,306 (2000).

Google Scholar

[51] P. W. Carter, J. Zhang, S. K. Grumbine and F. D. R. Thesauro, U.S. Patent 7,316,603 (2008).

Google Scholar

[52] K. Yadav, R. Manivannan, S.N. Victoria, Chemical mechanical planarization of ruthenium using sodium hypochlorite based titania slurry. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 6 (2017) 879.

DOI: 10.1149/2.0301712jss

Google Scholar

[53] Z. Liu, J. Quanci, R. E. Schmidt and T. M. Thomas, U.S. Patent 6,971,945 (2005).

Google Scholar

[54] J. Hazarika, P.V. Rajaraman, Formulation of sodium hypochlorite based slurry for copper-cobalt chemical mechanical planarization process. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 9 (2020) 24008.

DOI: 10.1149/2162-8777/ab682a

Google Scholar

[55] B.C. Peethala, H.P. Amanapu, U.R.K. Lagudu, S.V. Babu, Cobalt polishing with reduced galvanic corrosion at copper/cobalt interface using hydrogen peroxide as an oxidizer in colloidal silica-based slurries, J. Electrochem. Soc. 159 (2012) 582.

DOI: 10.1149/2.073206jes

Google Scholar

[56] S. Shao, B. Wu, P. Wang, P. He, P. Qu, Investigation on inhibition of ruthenium corrosion by glycine in alkaline sodium hypochlorite based solution, Appl. Surf. Sci. 506 (2020) 144976.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144976

Google Scholar