Improvement of Fracture Toughness (K1c) of 7075 Al Alloy by Cryorolling Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effects of cryorolling (Rolling at liquid nitrogen temperature) and optimum heat treatment (short annealing + ageing) on fracture toughness of 7075 Al alloy are reported in the present work. The Al 7075 alloy was rolled for different thickness reductions (40% and 70%) at cryogenic temperature and its mechanical, fracture toughness properties were studied. The microstructural characterization of the alloy was carried out by using Optical microscopy and Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). The cryo-rolled (CR) Al alloy after 70% thickness reduction exhibits ultrafine grain structure as observed from its FESEM micrographs. It is observed that the yield strength and fracture toughness of the CR material with 70% thickness reduction have increased by 108% and 73% respectively, compared to the starting material. The CR 7075 Al alloy shows improved fracture toughness and tensile strength due to high dislocation density, grain refinement, and ultrafine-grain (UFG) formation by multiple cryorolling passes. The CR samples were subjected to short annealing for 5 min at 190 0C, 170 0C and 150 0C followed by ageing at 160 0C, 140 0C and 120 0C for both 40% and 70% reduced samples. The combined effect of short annealing and ageing improves the fracture toughness, tensile strength, and ductility of cryorolled samples, which is due to precipitation hardening and subgrain coarsening mechanism respectively. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) fractographs of the Al 7075 alloy samples reveals that starting bulk Al alloy specimens is fractured in a total ductile manner, consisting of well-developed dimples over the entire surface and dimple size got decreased continuously for cryorolled specimens at different percentage of thickness reduction (40% and 70%) as observed in the present work.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

81-94

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. K. Panigrahi, R Jayaganthan, Materials Science Forum, Vols. 584-586, 2008, pp.734-740.

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Wang, M. Chen, F. Zhou, E. Ma, Nature, Vol. 419 (2002), p.912–915.

Google Scholar

[3] T.R. Lee, C.P. Chang, P.W. Kao, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, Vol. 408 (2005), p.131–135.

Google Scholar

[4] N. Rangaraju, T. Raghuram, B.V. Krishna, K.P. Rao, P. Venugopal: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, Vol. 398 (2005), pp.246-251.

Google Scholar

[5] Y.B. Lee, D.H. Shin, K.T. Park, W.J. Nam: Scripta Mater, Vol. 51 (2004), pp.355-359.

Google Scholar

[6] T. Shanmugasundaram, B.S. Murty, V.S. Sarma: Scripta Mater, Vol. 54 (2006), p.2013-(2017).

Google Scholar

[7] X. M. Li, M. J. Stranik: Materials Science and Technology, Vol. 17 (2001), pp.1324-1328.

Google Scholar

[8] R.Z. Valiev, R.K. Islamgaliev, I.V. Alexandrov: Prog. Mater. Sci., Vol. 45 (2000), p.103–189.

Google Scholar

[9] Jin-Feng LI, Zhuo-We P, Chao-Xing LI, Zhi-qiang J, Wen-Jing C, Zheng Z: Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, Vol. 18 (2008), p.755–762.

Google Scholar

[10] Williams JC, Starke EA. Acta Materialia, Vol. 51(19) (2003), p.5775–5799.

Google Scholar

[11] Woei-Shyan L, Wu-Chung S, Chi-Feng L, Chin-Jyi. W: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 100 (2000), p.116–22.

Google Scholar

[12] Steglich D, Brocks W, Heerens J, Pardoen T: Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 75(12)(2008), p.3692–706.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.04.008

Google Scholar

[13] P. Das, R Jayaganthan, I.V. Singh: J Mater Design (2010), doi: 10. 1016/ j. matdes. 2010. 09. 026.

Google Scholar

[14] R Jayaganthan, S. K. Panigrahi: Materials Science Forum, Vols. 584-586 (2008), pp.734-740.

Google Scholar

[15] E647-08, Standard test method for measurement of fatigue crack growth rates, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, (2008).

Google Scholar

[16] E399-08, Standard test method for Linear-Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness KIc of Metallic Materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, (2008).

DOI: 10.1520/e0399-06e01

Google Scholar

[17] E 1820-08a, Standard test method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, (2008).

Google Scholar

[18] E8 / E8M-09. Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, (2009).

Google Scholar

[19] P. Nageshwara Rao, S.K. Panigrahi and R. Jayaganthan: Materials Science and Technology, Vol. 26, No. 3 (2010), pp.371-374.

Google Scholar

[20] H. Somekawa , T. Mukai: Scripta Materialia, Vol. 53 (2005), p.1059–1064.

Google Scholar

[21] H. Somekawa, T. Mukai: Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol. 417 (2006), p.209–213.

Google Scholar

[22] N. Perez, Fracture Mechanics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Newyork, (2004).

Google Scholar

[23] E561-08, Standard test method for K-R curve determination. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, (2008).

Google Scholar

[24] E. Gariboldi, D. Ripamonti, L. Signorelli, G. Vimercati, F. Casaro: Metallurgical Science and Technology, (2003), pp.143-155.

Google Scholar

[25] S. K. Panigrahi, R. Jayaganthan: Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 480 (2008) p.299–305.

Google Scholar

[26] Z.C. Wang, P.B. Prangnell: Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 328 (2002), p.87–97.

Google Scholar