Quantitative Texture Analysis with the HIPPO TOF Diffractometer

Article Preview

Abstract:

One of the design goals of the neutron time-of-flight (TOF) diffractometer HIPPO (HIgh Pressure - Preferred Orientation) at LANSCE (Los Alamos Neutron Science Center) was efficient quantitative texture analysis. In this paper, the effects of the HIPPO detector geometry and layout on texture analysis, particularly the shape and dimensions of the detector panels, are investigated. An aluminum sample with a strong and asymmetric texture was used to determine the methodological limitations of various methods of quantitative texture analysis. Several algorithms for extracting the orientation distribution function (ODF) from the TOF-spectra are compared: discrete orientations at arbitrary positions, harmonic method in Rietveld codes (MAUD and GSAS) and discrete methods in MAUD. All methods provide a similar representation of the main texture component, but discrete methods have a fundamental advantage over harmonic methods in characterizing regions of the ODF with low orientation densities. For HIPPO data of the present sample, harmonic expansions beyond lmax= 12 introduce subsidiary maxima and minima, which are consistently identified as artifacts. The results of our analysis establishes HIPPO as an efficient instrument to quantitatively determine preferred orientations in relatively short measuring times, if the texture features are not exceedingly sharp (full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) in the ODF > 20-30°).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 495-497)

Pages:

113-118

Citation:

Online since:

September 2005

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. -R. Wenk, L. Lutterotti and S. Vogel: Nucl. Instr. Methods A Vol. 515 (2003), p.575.

Google Scholar

[2] S.C. Vogel, C. Hartig, L. Lutterotti, R.B. Von Dreele, H. -R. Wenk and D.J. Williams: Powder Diffraction Vol. 19 (2004), p.65.

DOI: 10.1154/1.1649961

Google Scholar

[3] S. Matthies: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 408-412 (2002) p.95.

Google Scholar

[4] L. Lutterotti, S. Matthies, H. -R. Wenk, A.J. Schultz and J.W. Richardson: J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 81 (1997) p.594.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Matthies, L. Lutterotti and H. -R. Wenk: J. Appl. Cryst. Vol. 30 (1997), p.31.

Google Scholar

[6] R.B. Von Dreele: J. Appl. Cryst. Vol. 30 (1997), p.577.

Google Scholar

[7] A.C. Larson and R.B. Von Dreele: General Structure Analysis System (GSAS). Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LAUR 86-748 (1994).

Google Scholar

[8] N.C. Popa: J. Appl. Cryst. Vol. 25 (1992), p.611.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Matthies, G.W. Vinel and K. Helming: Standard Distributions in Texture Analysis. Volume 1 (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin 1987).

Google Scholar