Networking as Multi-Purposed Tool for Innovative Organizations in Rural Areas

Abstract:

This paper builds on the findings of a survey to the innovative organizations located in Portuguese rural areas. This survey has been underlined and applied in the context of the project RUR@L INOV. The paper has two goals: to explore how networking is used by rural-based organizations and, second, to discuss how networking could be promoted by public policy to boost collaborative innovation. The evidence presented and discussed indicates that networking is used by rural-based innovators as a multi-purposed tool including the establishment of networks to obtain scale/scope effects and/or access local, mostly intangible, resources of rural areas. However, conventional innovation networks, usually led by R&D units or top-associations dont appear as a significant resource for most of the innovators. Probably, due to the organizations smallness, the high qualification of innovation leaders, together with their entrepreneurial attitude, these innovators search for knowledge and other resources by their own means and initiative. Nevertheless, this entrepreneurial attitude towards knowledge, information and skills demand could be shared by other, both existing organizations and new-entrants in the rural economies, through new networking models led by the innovators.

• Periodical: Advanced Engineering Forum (Volume 11)
• Pages: 70-75
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.11.70
• Online since: June 2014
• Authors: Lívia Madureira*, Teresa Maria Gamito, Dora Ferreira
• Keywords: Hidden Innovation, Innovation, Networking, Networking Innovation, Rural Areas

References

[1] Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2013). State of the Innovation Union 2012 - Accelerating change. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, COM (2013), 149 final.

[2] M. B. Jensen, B. Johnson, E. Lorenz and B. A.: LundvallForms of knowledge and modes of innovation. In: Research Policy, 36, (2007), p.680–693.

[3] A. Arundel, C. Bordoy, M. Kanerva: Neglected innovators: how do innovative firms that do not perform R&D innovate? Results of an analysis of the Innobarometer 2007 survey, nº 215. INNO-Metrics Thematic Paper, European Commission, DG Enterprise, Brussels, 31 March (2008).

[4] E. Kirner, S. Kinkel, A. Jaeger: Innovation paths and the innovation performance of low-technology-firms – an empirical analysis of German industry. In: Research Policy, 38, (2009), pp.447-458.

DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.011

[5] J.L. Hervas-Oliver, J. Albors-Garrigos, J. J.: Baixauli Beyond R&D activities: the determinants of firms' absorptive capacity explaining the access to scientific institutes in low medium-tech contexts. In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21, (2011).

DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2011.555113

[6] C. S. Pereira, F. C. Romero: Non-technological Innovation: Current Issues and Perspectives. In: Independent Journal of Management & Production, 4, (2013), pp.360-376.

[7] A. Trigo: The nature of innovation in R&D- and Non-R&D-intensive service firms: Evidence from firm-level latent class analysis. In: Industry and Innovation, 20, (2013), pp.48-68.

DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2013.761380

[8] H. Boer, W.: During, Innovation, what Innovation? A Comparison between Product, Process and Organisational Innovation. In: International Journal of Technology Management, 22, (2001), pp.83-109.

DOI: 10.1504/ijtm.2001.002956

[9] A. M. Baranano: The non-technological side of technological innovation: State-of-the-art and guidelines for further empirical research. In: International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 3, (2003), pp.107-125.

DOI: 10.1504/ijeim.2003.002223

[10] T. Schmidt, C.: Rammer, Non-technological and Technological Innovation: Strange Bedfellows?, ZEW Discussion Paper (2007).

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1010301

[11] OECD (2010), The OECD Innovation Strategy: getting a head start on tomorrow. OECD, Paris.

DOI: 10.1787/9789264083479-sum-en

[12] L. Madureira, T. M. Gamito, D. Ferreira, J. Portela: Inovação em Portugal Rural. Detetar, Medir e Valorizar, Princípia, Lisboa (2013).

[13] L. Madureira, T. M. Gamito, D. Ferreira, I. Oliveira: Innovation inputs and processes: the reality out of the box in the Portuguese rural áreas. In: T. Noronha, J. Gomes (org. ): Innovation for sustainability and networks, University of Algarve Book Series(2013).

[14] T. M. Gamito, L. Madureira, J. Portela, D.: Ferreira Measurement of good practices of innovation in rural areas. In: T. Noronha, J. Gomes (org. ): Innovation for sustainability and networks, University of Algarve Book Series (2013).

[15] G. Brunori, A. Rossi: Synergy and Coherence through Collective Action: Some Insights from Wine Routs in Tuscany. In: Sociologia Ruralis, 40, (2000), pp.409-423.

DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00157

[16] J. Murdoch: Networks a new paradigm of rural development? In: Journal of Rural Studies, 16, (2000), pp.407-419.

DOI: 10.1016/s0743-0167(00)00022-x

[17] A. Copus, D. Skuras: Business Networks and Innovation in Selected Lagging Areas of the European Union: A Spatial Perspective. In: European Planning Studies, 14, (2006), pp.79-92.

DOI: 10.1080/09654310500339885

[18] G. Thiele, A. Devaux, I. Reimoso, H. Pico, F. Montesdeoca, M. Pumisacho, J. A. Piedra, C. Veloso, P. Flores, R. Esprella, A. Thomann, K. Manrique, D.: Horton Multi-stakeholder platforms for linking small farmers to value chains: evidence from the Andes. In: International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 9, (2011).

DOI: 10.1080/14735903.2011.589206