Estimation of Mixed-Mode Stress Intensity Factors with Presence of the Confinement Parameters T-Stress and A3

Article Preview

Abstract:

A failure criterion is proposed for ductile fracture in U-notched components under mixed mode static loading. The Compact Tension Shear (CTS) is the preferred test specimen used to determine stress intensity factor in the mode I, mode II and the mixed-mode fracture. In this work, the mode I and mode II stress intensity factors were computed for different notch ratio lengths 0.1<a/W<0.7, of the inner radius of notch 0.25mm<ρ<4mm and load orientation angles 0°<α< 90° using finite element analysis. However, a review of numerical analysis results reveals that the conventional fracture criteria with only stress intensity factors (NSIFs) Kρ first term of Williams’s solution provide different description of stress field around notch zone comparing with results introduce the second and third parameter T-stress and A3.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

52-57

Citation:

Online since:

September 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] WILLIAMS M.L., «On the stress distribution at the base of stationary crack», J. of Appl. Mectr, 1957, Vol. 24, pp.109-4.

Google Scholar

[2] Cotterell, B., 1970. On fracture path stability in compact tension test. International Journal of Fracture Mechanics 6 (2), 189–192.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00189826

Google Scholar

[3] H. Adib, G. Pluvinage. 2003, Theoretical and numerical aspects of the volumetric approach for fatigue life prediction in notched components. International Journal of fatigue 25 67-76.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(02)00040-3

Google Scholar

[4] Guy Pluvinage, Joseph Gilgert, 2003, Fracture emanating from stress concentrators in materials: links with classical fracture mechanics. Materiali in Tehnologue 37 3-4, MTAEC9, 37[3-4]117(2003).

Google Scholar

[5] Vratnica M, Pluvinage G, Jodin P, Cvijovic Z, Rakin M, Burzic Z, 2010 , Influence of notch radius and microstructure on the fracture behavior of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys of different purity'. Materials and Design 31 1790–1798.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.018

Google Scholar

[6] Richard, H.A., Benitz, K. (1983). International Journal of Fracture 22, R55-R58.

Google Scholar

[7] Schillig, R. (1990). Ein Beitrag zur Ermüdungsrissausbreitung bei gleichphasiger Mixed-Mode Belastung. Fortschr. -Ber. VDI Reihe 18 Nr. 86, Düsseldorf: VDI Verlag.

Google Scholar

[8] Zhu XK, Leis BN. Fracture resistance curve testing of X-80 pipeline steel using SENB specimen and normalization method , j. of pipeline engineering 2008; 7: 126-136.

Google Scholar

[9] Pavankumar TV, Chattopadhyay j, Dutta, BK, Kushwaha HS. Transferability of specimen J- R curve to straight pipes with throughwall circumferential flaws, International J, Pressure Vessels and pipes 2002; 79: 127-134.

DOI: 10.1016/s0308-0161(01)00134-x

Google Scholar

[10] Tanaka K. Fatigue crack propagation from a crack inclined to the cyclic tensile axis.

Google Scholar

[11] Brown MW., Miller KJ. Initiation and growth of cracks in biaxial fatigue. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 1979, 1, pp.231-246.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1979.tb00380.x

Google Scholar

[12] Chen W.R., Keer L.M. Fatigue crack growth in mixed mode loading. Transaction ASME Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 1991, 7, pp.41-47.

Google Scholar

[13] Ueda Y., Ikeda K., Yao T., Aoki M. Characteristics of brittle fracture under general combined modes including those under biaxial tensile loads. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1983, 18, pp.1133-1158.

DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(83)90007-3

Google Scholar

[14] Jeng Y.S., Shah S.P. Mixed-mode fracture of concrete. International Journal of Fracture, 1988, 38, pp.123-142.

Google Scholar

[15] Williams, J.G. and Ewing, P.D. (1972). Fracture under complex stress – the angled crack problem. International Journal of Fracture 8, 441–446.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00191106

Google Scholar