Neural Measures Reveal Human Short-Term Working Memory–Varying Both Load and Cue Size

Article Preview

Abstract:

The objective of the study was to investigate neural processing during short-term visual working memory task under different memory load and cue size. Two or four items of the same sign but in different colors were presented on both sides of the screen, in which cues were applied as an indicator. Participants were cued to remember the colors of one side and then make a quickly response to the test sample. On the performance level, responses accuracy decreased with the increasing numbers of working memory loads. The response time increased with the increasing numbers of working memory load. The response time latency to the big cue was larger than that of the small cue. On the neural processing level, the high-load stimuli could arouse a more negative wave than the low-load stimuli.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

239-242

Citation:

Online since:

December 2011

Export:

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Baddeley, Working memory, Science 255 (1992) 556-559.

Google Scholar

[2] K.J. Gilhooly, R.H. Logie, Thinking in working memory, in: K.J. Gilhooly, R.H. Logie (Eds. ), Working memory and thinking, Current issues in thinking and reasoning, Psychology Press Ltd., East Sussex, 1998, pp.1-6.

DOI: 10.4324/9780203346754_chapter_one

Google Scholar

[3] S. Fu, J. Fedota, G. M. Pamela, R. Parasuraman. Early interaction between perceptual load and involuntary attention: An event-related potential study, J. Neuroscience Letters 468 (2010) 68-71.

DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.10.065

Google Scholar

[4] S. Petra, W. Susanne, D. Martin S, ERP effects of methylphenidate and working memory load in healthy adults during a serial visual working memory task, J. Neuroscience Letters 482 (2010) 172-176.

DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.07.030

Google Scholar

[5] D. Hubert, Zimmer, Visual and spatial working memory: From boxes to networks, J. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 32(2008) 1373-1395.

DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.05.016

Google Scholar

[6] H. Shibuya, C. Bundesen, Visual selection from multielement displays: measuring and modeling effects effects of exposure duration, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 14(4), (1988) 591-600.

DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.14.4.591

Google Scholar

[7] S.P. Marshall, C.L. Davis, S.R. Knust, The index of cognitive activity: estimating cognitive effort from pupil dilation. San Diego State University and Eye Tracking Inc. San Diego. (2004).

Google Scholar

[8] G.A. Alvarez, P. Cavanagh. The capacity of visual short term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. J. Psychol. Sci. 15(2), (2004) 106-111.

DOI: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502006.x

Google Scholar

[9] A. Kok, On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity, J. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 557-577.

DOI: 10.1017/s0048577201990559

Google Scholar

[10] E.K. Vogel, M.G. Machizawa, Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. J. Nature 428, (2004) 748-751.

DOI: 10.1038/nature02447

Google Scholar