Numerical Analysis of Streamlines in Kaplan Turbine with Different Distributor Fins Design

Abstract:

With each passing day companies are looking more and more in the initial phase of the project, to understand the phenomena arising, so that in the execution of the project there are no failures, much less when the project is in operation. For this, the numerical simulation has been shown an increasingly efficient tool to assist the engineers and designers of machines and equipment. The Kaplan turbine design requires a high level of engineering expertise combined with a high level of knowledge in fluid mechanics, as poor design of a diffuser fin can lead to disordered turbulent flow which, when mixed with a high pressure drop, can cavitate into turbine blades. The aim of this study is to evaluate different types of diffuser fin profiles in the inlet at Kaplan turbines. For this, numerical computer simulation was used with the aid of the Ansys Fluent software, in which simulations of water flow in a steady state occurred. The software works with the finite volume method for the discretization of the Navier-Stokes equations. The simulations have proved to be efficient in capturing current lines and pointing out the best flow profile in a project, avoiding more complex turbine blade problems.

• Periodical: Advanced Engineering Forum (Volume 35)
• Pages: 46-54
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.35.46
• Online since: February 2020
• Authors: Daniele Twardowski*, Diego Alves de Miranda
• Keywords: Cavitation, Distributor Fins, Kaplan Turbine, Numerical Simulation, Streamlines

References

[1] Deng, Z.; Carlson, T. J.; Ploskey, G. R.; Richmond, M. C.; Dauble, D. D. Evaluation of blade-strike models for estimating the biological performance of Kaplan turbines. Ecological Modelling, 208(2), 165–176. (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.05.019

[2] Zivkovic, S.; Cerce, L.; Kostic, J.; Majstorovic, V.; Kramar, D. Reverse Engineering of Turbine Blades Kaplan's type for Small Hydroelectric Power Station. 75 Procedia CIRP, 379–384. (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.037

[3] Zhang, M.; Valentín, D.; Valero, C.; Egusquiza, M.; Egusquiza, E. Failure investigation of a Kaplan turbine blade. Engineering Failure Analysis. 27(1), 690–700. (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.056

[4] Lai, X.D.; Liang, Q.W.; Ye, D.X.; Chen, X.M.; Xia, M.M. Experimental investigation of flows inside draft tube of a high-head pump-turbine. Renewable Energy. (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.058

[5] Luo, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zeng, J.; Lin, J. Fatigue of piston rod caused by unsteady, unbalanced, unsynchronized blade torques in a Kaplan turbine. Engineering Failure Analysis, 17(1), 192–199. (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.06.003

[6] Pacheco, V. F.; Miranda, D. A. Aerodynamic Analysis of High Energy Efficiency Vehicles by Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation. Advanced Engineering Forum, v.32, 41–51. (2019).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/aef.32.41

[7] Božić, I.; Benišek, M. An improved formula for determination of secondary energy losses in the runner of Kaplan turbine. Renewable Energy. 94, 537–546. (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.093

[8] Puolakka, O.; Keto-Tokoi, J.; Matusiak, J. Unsteady load on an oscillating Kaplan turbine runner. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 37, 22–33. (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2012.12.002

[9] Adhikari, R. C.; Wood, D. H. A new nozzle design methodology for high efficiency crossflow hydro turbines. Energy for Sustainable Development. 41, 139–148. (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2017.09.004

[10] Gabl, R.; Innerhofer, D.; Achleitner, S.; Righetti, M.; Aufleger, M. Evaluation criteria for velocity distributions in front of bulb hydro turbines. Renewable Energy. 121, 745–756. (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.01.027

[11] Soares, A. A. B.; Andrade, A. J. C.; Viana, D. M.; Ferreira, J. L. A. Previsão de vida à fadiga das pás de uma hidroturbina Kaplan. 16° Simpósio de Pós Graduação em Engenharia Mecânica da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia. Minas Gerais, (2016).

DOI: 10.36229/978-85-7042-207-1

[12] Javadi, A.; Nilsson, H. Detailed numerical investigation of a Kaplan turbine with rotor-stator interaction using turbulence-resolving simulations. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. 63, 1–13. (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2016.11.010

[13] Kumar, D.; Bhingole, P. P. CFD Based Analysis of Combined Effect of Cavitation and Silt Erosion on Kaplan Turbine. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2(4-5), 2314–2322. (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.276

[14] Miranda, D.A. Influence of Mesh Geometry and Mesh Refinement on Mathematical Models of Thermoplastic Injection Simulation Tools. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering. 15, 38-44. (2018).

[15] Sacchelli, C.M.; Miranda, D.A.; Dreschler, M.F.; Nogueira, A.L. Simulação computacional da injeção de termoplásticos: comparação de ferramentas tipo CAE. Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia de Fabricação. 1-12. (2017).

DOI: 10.26678/abcm.cobef2017.cof2017-1320

[16] Jawahar, C. P.; Michael, P. A. A review on turbines for micro hydro power plant. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 72, 882–887. (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.133

[17] Martinez, J. J.; Deng, Z. D.; Titzler, P. S.; Duncan, J. P.; Lu, J.; Mueller, R. P.; Renholds, J. F. Hydraulic and biological characterization of a large Kaplan turbine. Renewable Energy. 131, 240–249. (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.034