Stress Characteristics of Non-Axisymmetric Synthetic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Models: How Real are They?

Abstract:

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are abnormal aortic dilatations that are prone to rupture, with fatal consequences. Synthetic aneurysm models are being used to assess in vivo stress characteristics of aneurysms before and after surgical reinforcement. This study seeks to assess peak wall stress characteristics in a latex life- like model. A life-like non-axisymmetric latex AAA model, constructed from a 3D computed tomographic reconstruction of a real AAA, was incorporated into a pulsatile flow unit (PFU) to simulate the cardiac output. Strain gauges were placed at the neck (n= 2 x 3), inflection point (the junction of neck and sac, n=4 x 3) and maximum anteroposterior diameter (n=4 x 3). The arterial pressure settings used were 130/90 and 140/100mmHg, termed the low and high setting respectively. Strain readings were obtained at 10Hz over 30 seconds using a data logger. Stress was derived using the relationship between stress and Young’s modulus (E= 5.151872 Nmm-2). Peak wall stresses were statistically analysed over the two pressure settings using ANOVA in Minitab 13. The highest stresses were noted at the inflection point and not at the maximum diameter, as might have been expected. Peak inflection point stress anteriorly measured 394.69 (SD 218.1) x10-4 N/cm2 in the low setting, increasing to 715.39(SD 230.32) in the high setting (p<0.001). Posteriorly, peak wall stress measured as high as 373.61(SD207.24) x10-4 Ncm-2 in the low setting, and increased to 1053.32 (SD 347.01) x10-4 Ncm-2 in the high setting (p<0.001). High posterior stress conforms to in vivo studies. Peak wall stresses were not as high in the sac (range 35.08-204.98 x 10-4 Ncm-2 in the low setting and 54.66- 322.73 x 10-4 Ncm-2 in the high setting). An increase in blood pressure caused an increase only in the anterior and lateral, but not the posterior aspect of the sac (p<0.05). Abdominal aortic wall stress is highest at the inflection point, and is affected by blood pressure, which suggests that it is the area most likely to rupture and is critical to reinforcement of the AAA. These readings are lower than stress noticed in vivo due to the lower E of latex as compared to aneurysmal aorta, which structurally is primarily a multilaminate of elastin and collagen; however, the trends themselves may parallel those that occur in AAAs before and after endovascular or open grafting, and therefore justify artificial stress modelling of AAAs.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 1-2)
• Pages: 245-250
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.1-2.245
• Online since: September 2004
• Authors: Arindam Chaudhuri, Leslie E. Ansdell, Mohan Adiseshiah, Anthony J. Grass
• Keywords: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms, Latex Models, Peak Wall Stress

References

[1] Greenhalgh RM. Prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br Med J vol. 301 (1990): 136.

[2] Wilmink ABM, Quick CR. Epidemiology and potential for prevention of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg; 85 (1998): 155-62.

[3] White JV, Haas K, Philips S, Comerota AJ. Adventitial elastolysis is a primary event in aneurysm formation. J Vasc Surg; vol. 17 (1993): 371-380.

DOI: 10.1016/0741-5214(93)90422-i

[4] Dobrin P. Pathophysiology and pathogenesis of aortic aneurysms. Surg Clin N Am vol. 69(4) (1989): 687-702.

[5] Stonebridge PA, Draper T, Kelman J et al. Growth rate of infrarenal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc & Endovasc Surg; vol. 11(1) (1996 Jan): 0-3.

[6] Fillinger MF, Marra SP, Raghavan ML, Kennedy FE. Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: Wall stress versus diameter. J Vasc Surg vol. 37(4) (April 2003): 724-732.

DOI: 10.1067/mva.2003.213

[7] Fillinger MF. Aortic aneurysm wall stress analysis. Endovasc Today July/Aug 2003: 44- 48.

[8] Torsello GB, Klenk E, Kasprzak B, Umscheid T. Rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm previously treated by endovascular stentgraft. J Vasc Surg vol. 28(1) (July 1998): 184-187.

DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70214-9

[9] Chaudhuri A, Ansdell LE, Richards R, Adiseshiah M, Grass AJ Non- axisymmetric (lifelike) AAA models: a DIY approach. J Endovasc Ther vol. 10 (6) (2003): 37- 40.

DOI: 10.1177/152660280301000612

[10] Sumner DS. Essential hemodynamic principles. In Vascular Surgery (5th edition): p.38 (ed. Rutherford RB, WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia, USA, 1995).

[11] Flora HS, Talei-Faz B, Ansdell L, Chaloner EJ, Sweeny A, Grass A, Adiseshiah M. Aneurysm wall stress and tendency to rupture are features of physical wall properties: an experimental study. J Endovasc Ther vol. 9(5) (Sep-Oct 2002): 665-75.

DOI: 10.1177/152660280200900518

[12] Raghavan ML, Vorp DA, Federle MP, Makaroun MS, Webster MW. Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg vol. 31(4) (April 2000): 760-769.

DOI: 10.1067/mva.2000.103971

[13] Chaudhuri A, Ansdell LE, Adiseshiah M, Grass AJ. Aneurysmal hypertension and its relationship to sac thrombus: a semi- qualitative analysis by experimental fluid mechanics. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg vol. 27 (3) (March 2004): 305-310.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.11.010

[14] Darling RC, Messina CR, Brewster DC et al. Autopsy study of unoperated abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation; 56 (3, Suppl. ) (1977): II 161- 164.

[15] Hunter GC, Smyth SH, Aguirre ML et al. Incidence and histologic characteristics of blebs in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg vol. 24(1) (1996 Jul): 93-101.

DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70149-0

[16] Calvert G, Lesniak J, Honlet M. Applications of modern automated photoelasticity to industrial problems. Insight vol. 4 (April 2002): 1-4.