The Design State Maturity Model for Collaboration between Design and Manufacturing

Article Preview

Abstract:

The traditional series working mode can not make the outcome of product design process verified by activities of manufacturing domain in time, and the manufacturing process can not be executed concurrently. The purpose of this paper is to develop a method to solve the problem mentioned above. The connotation of the collaboration between design and manufacturing is studied firstly, and then the design state maturity model (DSMM) is proposed in this paper. Six levels of maturity are defined in this model, and every level can support the collaboration between design and manufacturing in different degree. Based on the design information required in the manufacturing process, the information included in each level is studied and particularized. Finally, the DSMM-based work process of collaboration between design and manufacturing is studied.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

165-171

Citation:

Online since:

December 2007

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2008 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M A. Roseman, J.S. Gero: Computer Aided Design, Vol. 28 (1996), p.123.

Google Scholar

[2] PIRITA SEITAMAA-HAKKARAINEN, ANNA-MARI RAUNIO, ASTA RAAMI, HANNI MUUKKONEN and KAI HAKKARAINEN: International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Vol. 11 (2001), p.181.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1011277030755

Google Scholar

[3] Jae Yeol Lee, Sunjae Lee, Kwangsoo Kim and Hyun Kim: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 26 (2005), p.1173.

Google Scholar

[4] L. Qiang, Y. F Zhang and A.Y.C. Nee: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 17 (2001), p.315.

Google Scholar

[5] JYH-CHENG YU, STEVEN KRIZAN and KOSUKE ISHII: Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 4 (1993), p.199.

Google Scholar

[6] SHAW C. FENG: Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 16 (2005), p.423.

Google Scholar

[7] Gerd Fricke: Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 8 (1996), p.151.

Google Scholar

[8] W.S. Ruy, Y. S. Yang: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 21 (2001), p.69.

Google Scholar

[9] W.Y. Zhang, S.B. Tor and G.A. Britton: Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 13 (2002), p.119.

Google Scholar

[10] MARK. C. PAULK: Software Quality Journal, Vol. 2 (1993), p.245.

Google Scholar

[11] Kevin Dooley, Anand Subra and John Anderson: Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 13 (2001), p.23.

Google Scholar

[12] Yogesh Deshpande, Athula Ginige, in: Web Engineering: Software Engineering and Web Application Development, edited by S. Murugesan and Y. Deshpande, volume 2016 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, p.36, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (2001).

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45144-7_2

Google Scholar

[13] M.H. Yang, T.Q. Zhang and R.G. Ding: Dong Yue Tribune, Vol. 24 (2003), PP. 134.

Google Scholar

[14] B. Deng: Computer Engineering, Vol. 29 (2003), p.122.

Google Scholar