Numerical Analysis for the Multi-Point Stretch Forming Process of Aircraft Skin Panel

Article Preview

Abstract:

Multi-point stretch forming (MPSF) is a new technique to form aircraft outer skin panel. Since multi-point die is composed by the discrete punches, the result of the MPSF aircraft outer skin panel need to study in depth. The thickness of elastic cushion and free length are two important factors to affect the accuracy, and they must be chosen reasonably. A series of numerical simulations on typical MPSF processes were carried out to an aircraft outer skin panel part. The results show that the thicker the elastic cushion is, the more valid the dimple will be suppressed .The longer free length is, the smaller the equivalent strain and thinning and more uniform the distribution of thickness will be. When the free length is shorter, the degree of effect is relatively obvious on the equivalent strain and thinning and the distribution of thickness; when the free length is longer than a certain value, the degree of effect is small.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

504-508

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Z.H. Zhou, Z.Y. Cai and M.Z. Li: Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition) Vol. 35(3) (2005), pp.287-291 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] H.M. Zhang: Numerical Simulation of the Sheet Metal Stretch-Forming Process Based on the Multi-Point Digital Die (Master Thesis, Jilin University 2006) (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] J.L. Wang: Numerical Study on the Typical Process Parameters in Multi-Point Stretch-Forming (Master Thesis, Jilin University 2007) (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] M.Z. Li, Nakamura K and Watanabe S et al: Proc. of the Japanese Spring conf. for Technology of Plasticity (1992), pp.519-522 (in Japanese).

Google Scholar

[5] Z.Y. Cai and M.Z. Li: International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping Vol. 79(4) (2002), pp.289-296.

Google Scholar

[6] D.F. Walczyk and D.E. Hardt: Journal of Manufacturing Systems Vol. 17(6) (1998), pp.436-454.

Google Scholar

[7] D.F. Walczyk, J. Lakshmikanthan and D.R. Kirt: Journal of Manufacturing Systems Vol. 17(4) (1998), pp.287-296.

Google Scholar

[8] J.M. Papazian: Mechanical Engineering Vol. 124(2) (2002), pp.52-55.

Google Scholar

[9] D.F. Walczyk, J.F. Hosford and J. Papazian: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering Vol. 125(2) (2003), pp.333-343.

Google Scholar