Overall Maintenance Time Reduction by Optimizing the Distance of Service Center in Manufacturing Unit through Single Facility Location Planning

Article Preview

Abstract:

A new methodology has been proposed to optimize both the planning of preventive maintenance and the time required to perform maintenance in a process plant is presented. In the Plant Maintenance process there is an increased need to make the shop floor layout more easily reachable user pliable. This allows Plant Maintenance staff to focus more on minimizing downtime and increasing productivity. Being more mobile allows them to go from more reactive maintenance to proactive maintenance. In this paper a single facility location problem with multiple relocation opportunities is investigated. The weight associated with each demand point is a known function of distance and time. We consider either rectilinear, or squared Euclidean, or Euclidean distances. The objective function is to minimize the total travelling distance from service center to various machines locations,thereby reducing the total maintenance time.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

4036-4042

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. L. Brandeau and S. S. Chiu, An overview of representative problems in location research, Management Science, vol. 35, pg. 645–674, (1989).

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.6.645

Google Scholar

[2] W. Isard, Location and Space Economy, Technology Press, MIT, Cambridge, MA, (1956).

Google Scholar

[3] H. Hotelling Stability in competition, Economic Journal, vol. 39, pp.41-57, (1929).

Google Scholar

[4] S. L. Hakimi, Optimal Locations of Switching Centers and the Absolute Centers and Medians of a Graph, Operations Research, vol. 12, pp.450-459, (1964).

DOI: 10.1287/opre.12.3.450

Google Scholar

[5] Vinayak Pandit, Local Search Heuristics for Facility Location problems, DCE, IIT, Delhi, July (2004).

Google Scholar

[6] Pranab K. D, Obstacle Avoidance & Travel path Determination in FLP, Vol-3, No-1, March 2009, pg 37-46.

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Drezner and HW Hamacher in 2002 Springer Verlag/books. google. co. in.

Google Scholar

[8] P. Linares and C. Romero, A Multiple Criteria decision Making Approach for Electricity Planning in Spain: Economic Versus Environmental Objectives, Journal of Operational Research Society, vol. 51, pp.736-743, (2000).

DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600944

Google Scholar

[9] E. S. Buffa and R. K. Sarin, Modern Production and Operations Management, 8th edition, New York: Wiley, (1987).

Google Scholar

[10] Fortenberry J. C & Mitra A. A Multiple Criteria Approach to the Location allocation Problem, Computer and Industrial Engineering, vol. 10, pp.77-87, 986.

DOI: 10.1016/0360-8352(86)90029-x

Google Scholar

[11] S. Kahne, A procedure for Optimizing Development Decisions, Automatica, ol. 11, pp.261-269, (1975).

DOI: 10.1016/0005-1098(75)90042-4

Google Scholar

[12] Richard L. Francis, Leon F. McGinnis Jr., John A. White, Facility Layout And Location: An Analytical Approach year 1998 published by Prentice Hall.

Google Scholar

[13] A. Bhattacharya, B. Sarkar and S. K, Mukherjee A New Method for Facility Location selection: A Holistic Approach", International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 11, pp.330-338, (2004).

Google Scholar

[14] J.A. Tompkins, and J.A. White, Facilities Planning, Wiley, New York, (1984).

Google Scholar