The Effect of Surface Roughness on Sursulf, Gas and Plasma Nitride Coatings on Austenitic Stainless Steel Type AISI 316LN

A. Devaraju; A. Elayaperumal

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.110-116.758

Paper Titles

Surface Modification Using Electric Discharge Machining (EDM) with Powder Addition
p.725

Optimization of Alkaline Activator/Fly ASH Ratio on the Compressive Strength of Manufacturing Fly ASH-BASED Geopolymer
p.734

Active Tendon Vibration Control of Cantilevered Beam Using Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) Actuators
p.740

The Effect of Cutting Parameters on Surface Integrity in Hard Turning
p.751

The Effect of Surface Roughness on Sursulf, Gas and Plasma Nitride Coatings on Austenitic Stainless Steel Type AISI 316LN
p.758

Surface Plasmon Polaritons: Propagation Characteristics of Surface Plasmon Waves on Au and Ag at Optical Wavelengths
p.764

Viscous Potential Flow Analysis of Rayleigh-Taylor Instability of Cylindrical Interface
p.769

Experimental Surface Profile of Dense Granular Media in Cylindrical Couette Flow
p.776

Numericl Analysis Supersonic Cavity Unsteady Flow
p.783

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 110-116The Effect of Surface Roughness on Sursulf, Gas...

The Effect of Surface Roughness on Sursulf, Gas and Plasma Nitride Coatings on Austenitic Stainless Steel Type AISI 316LN

Abstract:

Austenitic stainless steel type AISI 316LN (316LN SS) material has been nitrided by three different nitride techniques such as Sursulf, Gas and Plasma nitriding. The 316LN SS samples have been prepared with two different surface roughnesses. The effects of surface roughness on nitriding with respect to formation of coating, case depth, increase in surface hardness and coating adhesion strength have been evaluated. The coating thickness was high for mirror polished samples than ground samples for all nitriding techniques. The coating thickness was very high (76.5µm) for plasma nitrided (PN) mirror polished sample and thin (22.5µm) & uneven for Sursulf Nitrided (SSN) ground sample. However, the SSN sample produces high surface hardness and good adhesion strength than PN. The Gas nitided (GN) sample produces the moderate result between SSN and PN.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, ICMAE2011

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 110-116)

Pages:

758-763

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.110-116.758

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2011

Authors:

A. Devaraju, A. Elayaperumal

Keywords:

Coating Adhesion Strength, Coating Thickness, Microhardness, Surface Roughness (SR)

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] C.X. Li and T. Bell: Wear 256 (2004), p.1144.

Google Scholar

[2] C.S. Chandrasekhara Murthy and A. Ramamohana Rao: Tribology international (1983), p.3.

Google Scholar

[3] G. Castro, A. Fernández-Vicente and J. Cid: Wear 263 (2007), p.1375.

Google Scholar

[4] Podgornik and J. Vižintin: Mat. Sci. Eng. A 315(2001), p.28.

Google Scholar

[5] Tae- H Lee, Chang – Seok Oh, Min –Ku Lee and Sang- Worn Han: Mat. Char. 61 (2010), p.975.

Google Scholar

[6] D.Q. Peng, T.H. Kim, J.H. Chung and J.K. Park: Appl. Surf. Sci. 256(2010), p.7522.

Google Scholar

[7] T. Kumar: Effect of Nitriding on the hardness, microstructure, Corrosion and wear behaviors of AISI 316LN stainless steel. PhD thesis, Anna University, India (2009).

Google Scholar

[8] M.A. Pessin, M.D. Tier, T.R. Strohaecker, A. Bloyce, Y. Sun and T. Bell: Tribology letters 8(2009), p.223.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1019199604963

Google Scholar

[9] K. Marchev, C.V. Copper and B.C. Giessen: Surf. Coat. Tech. 99(1998), p.229.

Google Scholar