Studies on MAaximum Hydrostatic Testing Pressure for New Pipeline

Article Preview

Abstract:

Hydrostatic testing is an important step in pipeline construction. This test ensures the integrity of newly-constructed pipelines. Testing pressures used by Chinese construction contractors are lower than that in foreign countries. Nowadays, higher testing pressure is considered safer for pipeline operation. But what is testing pressure we should apply Basing on fracture mechanics theory, this paper addresses the effects of testing pressure on pipeline materials, and calculates the maximum safe testing pressure. Also, experiments validate the theoretic conclusions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

162-166

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Bergman, S.A., "Why Not Higher Operating Pressures for Lines Tested to 90% SMYS?" Pipeline and Gas Journal(December 1974).

Google Scholar

[2] Brooks L.E., "High-Pressure Testing – Pipeline Defect Behavior and Pressure Reversals" ASME, 68-PET-24,(1968).

Google Scholar

[3] Kiefner, J.F., Maxey, W.A., and Eiber, R.J., "A Study of the Causes of Failure of Defects That Have Survived a Prior Hydrostatic Test", Pipeline Research Committee, American Gas Association, NG-18 Report No. 111(November 3, 1980).

DOI: 10.55274/r0010049

Google Scholar

[4] The American Society of Mechanical Engineers,ASME B31.8—2003 Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems

Google Scholar

[5] Canadian Standards Association,CSA-Z662-03 Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems[S]

Google Scholar

[6] Sinha J. P., "A case study on hydrostatic testing of operating cross-country pipeline" Third International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition,1999.01.09-12.

Google Scholar

[7] Koets O. J., "Commissioning offshore gas pipelines", Pipeline & Gas Journal, 1989, 216(11).

Google Scholar

[8] Hodges A. H., Hydrotest measurement system for gas lines gets field trials, Oil & Gas Journal, 1989,87(32).

Google Scholar