Imposing Essential Boundary Conditions in Isogeometric Analysis with Nitsche’s Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Isogeometric Analysis combines the NURBS technology and finite element approaches into a unified framework. Regrettably, the NURBS basis functions don’t interpolate at the control points, which lead to the difficulty for imposing the essential boundary conditions. A new approach inspired by Nitsche’s notion was proposed in order to remedy this issue. The essential boundary constraints are enforced by the consistent penalty terms. It has some notable advantages than the other methods, such as (i) the symmetric and positive definite bilinear formulation when the stiffness matrix is symmetric and the stabilization parameter is large enough; (ii) the well-conditioning coefficient matrix of the linear system. Finally, the numerical experiment was performed to verify the optimal rate of convergence of the present method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2779-2783

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T. Hughes, J.A. Cottrell and Y. Bazilevs: Comput Method Appl M Vol. 194 (2005), p.4135

Google Scholar

[2] A. Embar, J. Dolbow and I. Harari: Int J Numer Meth Eng Vol. 83 (2010), p.877

Google Scholar

[3] S. Fernandez-Mendez and A. Huerta: Comput Method Appl M Vol. 193 (2004), p.1257

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Bazilevs and T. Hughes: Comput Fluids Vol. 36 (2007), p.12

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Bazilevs, C. Michler, V.M. Calo and T. Hughes: Comput Method Appl M Vol. 196 (2007), p.4853

Google Scholar

[6] M. Griebel and M.A. Schweitzer, in: Geometric Analysis and Nonlinear partial Differential Equations, edtied by Springer-Verlag, Berlin(2002)

Google Scholar

[7] A. Embar, J. Dolbow and I. Harari: Int J Numer Meth Eng Vol. 83 (2010), p.877

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Bazilevs, L.B. Da Veiga, J.A. Cottrell, T. Hughes and G. Sangalli: Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences Vol. 16 (2006), p.1031

DOI: 10.1142/s0218202506001455

Google Scholar