Characterization of Global Form Deviations for Spiral Bevel Gear and Correction of Machine-Setting Parameters

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to improve the machining accuracy of spiral bevel gear, difference surface was adopted to characterize its global form deviations quantifiably and correct its deviations. The quantitative mathematical relationship between the actual tooth surface deviations of spiral bevel gear and the corrected values of the machine-setting parameters had been referred, and the theoretical correction formula of the global form deviations had been gotten by the least square method. Finally, the pinion of spiral bevel gear in the automobile rear axle has been set for an example to account for the effectiveness of the deviation correction by use of the difference surface method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

616-620

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Xu Zhong-si. The research on evaluation method of tooth surface topographic deviation for spiral bevel gear [D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Technology, (2006) (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Xie Hua-kun, Wang Zhi, Shi Zhao-yao, et al. Development on Technology of Bevel Gear Measurement [J]. Tool Engineering, 2003, 37(10): 48~51(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Gosselin, Guertin, Remond. Simulation and Experimental Measurement of the Transmission Error of Real Hypoid Gears under Load [J] . ASME, J. Mech. Des. 2000, 122(3): 109~122.

DOI: 10.1115/1.533555

Google Scholar

[4] Lin Chung-yun, Chung-Biau Tsay, Feng Zhang-hua. Mathematical model of spiral bevel and hypoid gears manufactured by the modified roll method [J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 1997, 32(2): 121~136.

DOI: 10.1016/s0094-114x(96)00043-2

Google Scholar

[5] Tilo Pfeifer, Syuhei Kurokawa, Stefen Meyer. Derivation of parameters of global form deviations for 3-dimensional surfaces in actual manufacturing processes [J]. Measurement, 2001, 29(3): 179~200.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-2241(00)00038-5

Google Scholar