Research on Mesh Generation Effecting Resistance Calculation

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to give consistent and agreeable results in resistance and other hydrodynamic performance with some of the viscous Computational Fluid Dynamics methods which appear to have difficulties when applied to hulls, the investigation of the influential factors like mesh generation which affect the calculation results are taken by the simulation of different cases in the present paper. Through calculation and analysis, specifically with the CFD code FLUENT, an alternative set of computation parameters of mesh generation for engineering application is suggested. The application of the suggestion to the hull researched in this paper result in better agreements with corresponding model tests.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

886-893

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Gao Qiuxin: A Survey on Computational Naval Hydrodynamics. Journal of Ship Mechanics Vol. 3 (1998), p.74.

Google Scholar

[2] Cai Rongquan: Current situation of ship CFD and our knowledge. SHIP & BOAT Vol. 1 (2002), p.29.

Google Scholar

[3] De Palma. P., de Tullio. M.D., Pascazio. G., Napolitano. M.: An immersed-boundary method for compressible viscous flows. Comput. Fluids Vol. 7 (2006), p.693.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2006.01.004

Google Scholar

[4] Zhang S C: Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics(SPH) Method(A Review). Chinese Journal of Computational Physics Vol. 13 (1996), p.385.

Google Scholar

[5] Pablo M. Carrica, Robert V. Wilson, Ralph W. Noack, Fred Stern: Ship motions using single-phase level set with dynamic overset grids. Computers & Fluids Vol. 36 (2007), p.1415.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.01.007

Google Scholar

[6] Qun Zhao, Steve Armfield and Katsutoshi Tanimoto: Numerical Simulation of Breaking Waves by a Multi-Scale Turbulence Model. Coastal Engineering Vol. 1 (2004), p.53.

DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2003.12.002

Google Scholar

[7] ITTC: Proceedings of the 24th ITTC-Volume I (2005).

Google Scholar

[8] ZHANG Nan, AHEN Hong-cui and YAO Hui-zhi: Uncertainty analysis in CFD for resistance and flowfield. Journal of Ship Mechanics Vol. 12 (2008), p.211.

Google Scholar

[9] ITTC: QM Procedure 7. 5- 03- 01- 01[S] (2002).

Google Scholar

[10] ITTC: QM Procedure 7. 5- 03- 02- 01[S] (2002).

Google Scholar

[11] Zhi-rong Zhang, in: Verification and validation for RANS simulation of KCS container ship without/with propeller. 9th International Conference on Hydrodynamics. Shanghai, China (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/s1001-6058(10)60055-8

Google Scholar

[12] Lu Zou, Lars Larsson and Michal Orych, in: Verification and validation of CFD perdictions for a manoeuvring tanker. 9th International Conference on Hydrodynamics. Shanghai, China (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/s1001-6058(09)60233-x

Google Scholar

[13] LIU Chong-yang, YU Fang and XU Rang-shu: A grid error analysis example in CFD. Journal of Shenyang Institute of Aeronautical Engineering Vol. 23 (2006), p.21.

Google Scholar

[14] KANG Shun, SHI Lei, DAI Li-Ping, FAN Zhong-Yao: Analyse of CFD simulation error and study of grid convergence. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics Vol. 31 (2010), p. (2009).

Google Scholar

[15] XU Xiao-ping, ZHOU Zhou: Application of Polyhedral Mesh in CFD. Flight Dynamics Vol. 27 (2009), p.87.

Google Scholar

[16] Ming Pingjian, Zhang Wenping and Zhu Minggang: New AMG Method and Application in CFD. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology Vol. 33 (2009), p.87.

Google Scholar

[17] SANGKUN PARK, KUNWOO LEE: Automatic multiblock decomposition using hypercube++ for grid generation. Computers & Fluids Vol. 27 (1998), p.509.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7930(97)00040-6

Google Scholar

[18] Zhu Ziqiang, Li Jing, Zhang Zhengke, Chen Zemin, Wu Ziniu, Li Haiming: Grid generation method in CFD and its application. Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica Vol. 19 (1998), p.152.

Google Scholar

[19] Rui Deng, De-bo Huang, Jia Li, Xuan-kai Cheng, and Lei Yu: Discussion of Grid Generation for Catamaran Resistance Calculation. Journal of Marine Science and Application Vol. 9 (2010), p.187.

DOI: 10.1007/s11804-010-9080-2

Google Scholar

[20] DENG Rui, Huang Debo, YU Lei, CHENG Xuankai, LIANG Hongguang: Research on factors of a flow field affecting catamaran resistance calculation. Journal of Harbin Engineering University Vol. 32 (2011), p.141.

Google Scholar

[21] Chen Qingyan, Zhai Zhiqiang, in: How realistic is CFD as a toll for indoor environment design and studies without experiment. The 4th International Symposium on HVAC, Beijing, China (2003).

Google Scholar

[22] Fred Stern, Robert V W, Hugh W C, et al, in: Verification and validation of CFD simulations. IIHR(Iowa Insititute of Hydraulic Research) Report, No 407. University of Iowa (1999).

Google Scholar