Effect of Canal Depth on Sound Pressure Level Distribution in Human Bilateral Ears

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study was to measure the sound pressure level distribution by ear canal resonance in the human left and right external auditory canals (EAC). The gain for different stimulus frequencies was analyzed at four different measuring depths (0.5 cm, 1.0 cm, 1.5 cm and 2.0 cm) from the entrance of the ear canal bilaterally. Comparative evaluation showed that the gain for different stimulus frequencies at a depth of 2.0 cm was consistent with the results of Dillon’s study. In addition, the gain for the right EAC at 4000 Hz was larger than that of the left EAC by 1.2 dB at 0.5 cm, 1.8 dB at 1.0 cm, and 0.8 dB at 1.5 cm. This seems to suggest that gain at 4000 Hz is more affected by depth in the right EAC than in the left EAC. This study further found that the gain at the stimulus frequency of 4000 Hz was more affected by the depth than at 2000 Hz for the bilateral ear canals respectively. These gain differences between the right and left ears were statistically significant (p<0.05) at any of four measuring depths. The findings of this study may have an understanding of gain distribution to have implications for microphone placement of custom-made bilateral hearing aids (i.e. ITC or CIC) as these are placed at different depths within the ear canal. Keywords: Sound pressure level; Canal depth; Ear canal resonance; Real ear measurement; External auditory canal

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

63-67

Citation:

Online since:

December 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] E. A. Shaw. J Acoust Soc Am, 56: 1848-1861 (1974).

Google Scholar

[2] L. E. Kinsler, A.R. Frey, A. B. Coppens, and J. V. Sanders. Fundamentals of Acoustics (1982).

Google Scholar

[3] R. D. Rabbitt, M. H. Holmes. J Acoust Soc Am, 83: 1064-1080 (1988).

Google Scholar

[4] P. Morse, U. Ingard. Theoretical Acoustics, McGraw-Hill, New York, p.509–514 (1968).

Google Scholar

[5] V. S. Chourasia, Tiwari, Ranjan Gangopadhyay. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 1: 1-10(2010).

Google Scholar

[6] S. M. Debbal, F. Bereksi-Reguig. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 5(4): 517-530 (2005).

Google Scholar

[7] M. R. Stinson, S. M. Khanna. J Acoust Soc Am, 96: 170-180 (1994).

Google Scholar

[8] K. N. Stevens, R. Berkovitz, G. Kidd Jr., D. M. Green. J Acoust Soc Am, 81: 470-484 (1987).

Google Scholar

[9] G. T. Huang, J. J. Rosowski, S. Puria, W. T. Peake. J Acoust Soc Am, 108: 1128-1146 (2000).

Google Scholar

[10] J. Zwislocki, B. Kruger, J. D. Miller, A. F. Niemoller, E. A. G. Shaw, G. Studebaker. J Acoust Soc Am, 83, 1688–1689 (1988).

Google Scholar

[11] M. Ravicz, E. S. Olson, J. J. Rosowski. J Acoust Soc Am, 122: 2154-2173 (2007).

Google Scholar

[12] K. Kryter. Academic Press, Oriando, USA (1985).

Google Scholar

[13] C. -K. Chen, J. -F. Yu, C. -I. Chen, M. -J. Lien, C. -C. Cheng, W. -D. Cheng, S. -R. Wang. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 31(3) (2011).

Google Scholar

[14] M. S. Hsieh, F. P. Lee, M.D. Tsai. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 2010, 30(1): 57-63.

Google Scholar

[15] J. -F. Yu, G. -L. Tsai, C. -C. Fan, C. -I Chen, C. -K. Chen. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, (2011).

Google Scholar

[16] H. Dillon. Boomerang Press., New York (2001).

Google Scholar

[58] 8.

Google Scholar

[59] 7.

Google Scholar

[58] 8.

Google Scholar

[59] 3.

Google Scholar

[70] 3.

Google Scholar

[70] 0.

Google Scholar

[65] 0.

Google Scholar

[66] 2 1.

Google Scholar

[58] 7.

Google Scholar

[59] 6.

Google Scholar

[58] 3.

Google Scholar

[59] 1.

Google Scholar

[70] 8.

Google Scholar

[71] 6.

Google Scholar

[68] 0.

Google Scholar

[69] 8.

Google Scholar

[58] 9.

Google Scholar

[59] 9.

Google Scholar

[58] 7.

Google Scholar

[60] 1.

Google Scholar

[72] 6.

Google Scholar

[71] 8.

Google Scholar

[71] 6.

Google Scholar

[72] 4 2.

Google Scholar

[58] 4.

Google Scholar

[59] 4.

Google Scholar

[59] 7.

Google Scholar

[60] 2.

Google Scholar

[72] 8.

Google Scholar

[71] 2.

Google Scholar

[74] 0.

Google Scholar

[75] 2 Table 2 Gain at depths of 0. 5 cm, 1. 0 cm, 1. 5 cm and 2. 0 cm in the external auditory canal of 16 subjects (Unit: dB) Frequency Depth 500 Hz 1000 Hz 2000 Hz 4000 Hz (cm) Left Right Left Right Left Right Left Right.

DOI: 10.7554/elife.48971.008

Google Scholar

5 -1. 2 -0. 3 -1. 2 -0. 7.

Google Scholar

[10] 3.

Google Scholar

[10] 0.

Google Scholar

[6] 2 1 -1. 3 -0. 4 -1. 7 -0. 9.

Google Scholar

[10] 8.

Google Scholar

[11] 6.

Google Scholar

[1] 5 -1. 1 -0. 1 -1. 3.

Google Scholar

[12] 6.

Google Scholar

[11] 8.

Google Scholar

[11] 6.

Google Scholar

[12] 4 2 -1. 6 -0. 6 -0. 3.

Google Scholar

[12] 8.

Google Scholar

[11] 2.

Google Scholar

[14] 0.

Google Scholar

[15] 2 Dillon.

Google Scholar

[12] 0.

Google Scholar

[15] 0 (a) (c) (b) Figure 1 The (a) probe tube was laid along the floor of the left ear canal. The depths were measured from the (b) entrance of the canal. The (c) reference microphone was placed on the pinna. Figure 2 Gain distribution in the bilateral external auditory canals (Unit: dB) Figure 3 Gain at depths of 0. 5 cm, 1. 0 cm, 1. 5 cm and 2. 0 cm within the left external auditory canal Figure 4 Gain at depths of 0. 5cm, 1. 0 cm, 1. 5 cm and 2. 0 cm within the right external auditory canal.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8994/fig-6

Google Scholar