Effect of Artificial Defect and Mean Shear Stress on Torsional Fatigue Behaviour

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of this work is to study the influence of artificial defect and mean stress on fatigue strength under torsion loading. Spherical artificial defects have been machined at the surface of gauge length of fatigue samples. Experimental investigations conducted on both defective and defect free materials. The crack initiation mechanisms have been identified based on several observations on Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) at different stage of fatigue life. It is observed that the defect free material subjected to torsion loading allows relatively earlier initiation. Experimental results show that mean shear stress has no effect on fatigue behaviour under torsion loading. It is also concluded that defects are much more damaging in high cycle fatigue regime than in low cycle fatigue one.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

74-82

Citation:

Online since:

December 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] G. Sines, J.L. Waisman. (1959) : Behaviour of metals under complex static and alternating stresses. In : G. Sines, J.L. Waisman, T.J. Dolan, editors. Metal Fatigue, New York, (p.145).

Google Scholar

[2] Findley WN. Effects of extremes of hardness and mean stress on fatigue of AISI steel in bending and torsion. ASME Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology. 111 (1989) 119.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3226442

Google Scholar

[3] Shigley JE, Mischke CR, Mechanical Engineering Design, Fifth edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989. [ISBN 0-07-056899-5].

Google Scholar

[4] Endo M, McEvily AJ, Matsunaga H, Eifler D. (2006). The growth of short cracks from defects under multi-axial loading. In Gdoutos EE, editor. Proceedings of ECF16: fracture of nano and engineering materials and structures, Alexandroupolis (p.1).

DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4972-2_605

Google Scholar

[5] M. Endo, I. Ishimoto. : Effects of phase difference and mean stress on the fatigue strength of small-Hole-containing Specimens subjected to combined Load . Journal of solid Mechanics and Materials Engineering. 3 (2007) 343.

DOI: 10.1299/jmmp.1.343

Google Scholar

[6] Ting JC, Lawrence FV : Modelling the long life fatigue behaviour of cast aluminium alloy. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 16 (1993) 631.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1993.tb00108.x

Google Scholar

[7] Couper MJ, Neeson AE, Griffiths JR : Casting defects and the fatigue behaviour of an aluminium casting alloy. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 3 (1990) 213.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-1123(91)90181-w

Google Scholar

[8] T. Billaudeau, Y. Nadot and G. Bezine : Multiaxial fatigue limit for defective materials: mechanisms and experiments. Acta Materialia. 52 (2004) 3911.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.006

Google Scholar

[9] Murakami Y., Metal Fatigue : effects of small defects and nonmetallic inclusions. Elsevier editor. London, 2002. [ISBN: 0-08-044064-9].

Google Scholar

[10] T. Palin-luc : Elastomer and resin replicaes for SEM observation of metallic materials. Experimental Techniques. 26 (2002) 33.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2002.tb00067.x

Google Scholar

[11] A. Nasr, Y. Nadot, Ch. Bouraoui, R. Fathallah and M. Jouiad : Fatigue initiation in C35 steel: Influence of loading and defect. International Journal of Fatigue. 32 (2010) 780.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.09.012

Google Scholar

[12] Nadot Y, Ranganathan N, Mendez J, Beranger AS : A study of natural cracks initiated on casting defects by crack front marking. Scripta Mater. 5 (1997) 549.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(97)00158-9

Google Scholar

[13] El Haddad MH, Topper TH, Smith KN. Engng Fract Mech. 11 (1979) 573.

Google Scholar