Preliminary Research on Particle Size Analyses Method of the Quicklime-Stabilized Dredged Material

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper presents a comparative study of particle size analyses of quicklime-stabilized dredged material (LSDM) by combined sieve-hydrometer method (SHM), laser diffraction method (LDM) and sieve method (SM). After analyzed the testing processes and compared the results comprehensively, some conclusions can be conduction. Adopting SHM and LDM to test the particle size of LSDM, not only break the structure unit of soil, but also change its property due to the pure water used as disperser. In addition, the severe flocculation, which attributed to the dissolvable salt in soil introduced by quicklime can’t be drainage effectively, result in the abnormal particle size distribution (PSD) curves produced by the SHM. Therefore, SHM and LDM are not suitable for the particle size analyses of LSDM. SM, without deteriorating the unit structure of aggregates and altering the properties of soil, should be adopted as the most suitable method for LSDM.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

254-260

Citation:

Online since:

December 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] G.C. Sigust. Dredged and Sewage Sludge Materials, Vol. 5 (1). (2005), pp.50-52.

Google Scholar

[2] Y.F. Gao, Z.S. Hong, B. Li, Y. Gui and G.D. Cheng. China. Patent 200810019879. (2008).

Google Scholar

[3] T.J. Zhang. Research for disposing the high-water-content waste dredged clayey soils. PhD Thesis. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2007(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] B.T. Wang. Technology of soil testing, edited by Hohai University Press, Nanjing (2005), in press.

Google Scholar

[5] B.P. Wen, A. Aydin and N.S. Duzgoren-Aydin. Geotechnical Testing Journal. Vol. 25(4). (2002), pp.1-9.

Google Scholar

[6] Ministry of Transport P.R. China. (1985). Standard for soil test method,. JTJ 051-85, Beijing (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Paul R. Krause, K.A.M. The Beneficial Reuse of Dredged Material for Upland Disposal. HLA Project No. 48881, (2000), pp.19-23.

Google Scholar

[8] S.X. Xie. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, Vol(3), (1963), pp.36-41.

Google Scholar

[9] J.W. Lu and Z.B. Li. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol (1), (2002), pp.81-85.

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Cai,B. Shi Z.B. Liu. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 27 (12), (2005), pp.1482-1486.

Google Scholar

[11] X.P. Zhang,B. Shi. Journal of Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, Vol (5), (2006), pp.1-5.

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Gui. Study on disposing the high-water-content waste dredged sludge and the compaction method of the lime treated sludge soil. 2010, Hohai University: Nanjing.

Google Scholar

[13] M. Arabi, S. Wild. Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 21 (2), (1986), pp.497-503.

Google Scholar

[14] S. Wild, M. Arabi. Clay Minerals, Vol. (21), (1986), pp.279-292.

Google Scholar

[15] D.I. Boardman, S. Glendinning, C.D.F. Rogers. Geotechnique, Vol. 51(6), (2001), pp.533-543.

Google Scholar

[16] G. Rajasekaran. Journal of Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 122(5), (1996), pp.323-342.

Google Scholar

[17] S.M. Rao, P. Shivananda. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Vol. 23(1), (2005), pp.79-85.

Google Scholar

[18] G. Rajasekaran. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, Vol. 23 (1-2), (2005), pp.93-116.

Google Scholar

[19] S.Z. Mei. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol (5), (1982), pp.47-53.

Google Scholar

[20] Z.Q. Yang, J.Y. Guo. Rock and Soil Mechanics, Vol. 12 (3), (1991), pp.11-23.

Google Scholar

[21] X. Huang, J.G. Ning, S. Xu. Industrial Construction, Vol. 36 (7), (2006), pp.19-24.

Google Scholar