Analysis of Hot Working Characteristics of Aluminium Based Composites Using Response Surface Methodology

Article Preview

Abstract:

During deformation process, it is essential to control the formability parameters viz., stress, strain, temperature, aspect ratio, volume fraction etc., to obtain sound and defect free products. Moreover, in deformation process in general, upsetting in particular, conducting too many trail experiments results in increased experimental time and cost. Hence modeling of process parameter attracts attention of researchers. The objective of modeling the process parameters is to determine which variables are most influential during metal forming operations. In the present investigation, by connecting the influential process parameters during metal forming in general upsetting in particular, a mathematical model have been developed using Design of Experiments (D.O.E) which could be applied to estimate the flow stress. Aluminium MMCs with silicon carbide (SiCp) and aluminium oxide (Al2O3) as reinforcement have been chosen in this current study as it has significant advantage over conventional materials.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3-8

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Ayyar and N. Chawla, Microstructure based modeling of crack growth in particle reinforced composites, Composites Sci. and Technol. 66 (2006) 1980-(1994).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.01.007

Google Scholar

[2] R. Narayanasamy, and K.S. Pandey, Phenomenon of barreling in aluminium solid cylinders during cold upset-forming, J. of Mat. Process. Tech. 70 (1997) 17-21.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(97)00035-6

Google Scholar

[3] S. Kumar and V. Balasubramanian, Effect of reinforcement size and volume fraction on the abrasive wear behaviour of AA7075 Al/SiCp P/M composites- A statistical analysis, Tribology Intern. 43(2010) 414-422.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2009.07.003

Google Scholar

[4] John A. Pale, Rajiv Shivpuri and Taylan altan. Recent developments in tooling, machines and research in cold forming of complex parts, J. of Mat. Process. Tech. 33(1992) 1-29.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(92)90309-g

Google Scholar

[5] G.E. Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy, McGraw-Hill Book Company, London, UK, p.287, (1988).

Google Scholar

[6] T.S. Srivatsan and A. Prakash, The quasi-static fracture behavior of an aluminum alloy metal-matrix composite, Composites Sci. and Technol. 54(1995) 307-315.

DOI: 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00057-7

Google Scholar

[7] L.X. Li, D.S. Peng, J.A. Liu and Z.Q. Liu, An experimental study of the lubrication behavior of graphite in hot compression test of Ti-6Al-4V alloy, J. of Mat. Process. Tech. 112(2001) 1-5.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(00)00845-1

Google Scholar

[8] A. Rajesh Kannan, K.S. Pandey and S. Shanmugam, Some investigation on the cold deformation behaviour of sintered iron–0. 8% carbon alloy powder preforms, J. of Mat. Process. Tech. 203(2008) 542-547.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.068

Google Scholar

[9] Horng-Yu Wua., Geng-Zhong Zhoua., Zhen-Wei Gaoa and Chui-Hung Chiub, Mechanical properties and formability of an Mg–6% Li–1% Zn alloy thin sheet at elevated temperatures, J. of Mat. Process. Tech. 206 (2008) 419–424.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.045

Google Scholar

[10] Z. Xue, Y. Huang and M. Li, Particle size effect in metallic materials: A study by the theory of mechanism-based strain grain gradient plasticity, Acta Materlia, 50 (2002) 149-160.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(01)00325-1

Google Scholar