Modelling Significant Wave Height Data of North Sea: Rayleigh vs Weibull Distribution

Article Preview

Abstract:

Significant wave height is generally defined as the mean height of the highest one third of the waves in the sample and is widely regarded as an approximate equivalent to the visually observed height. Some studies assumed that wave heights can be described in terms of Log-normal, Generalized Gamma and Beta distribution, while others proposed Rayleigh distributions. In this paper, we wish to compare Rayleigh distribution with those obtained using two-parameter Weibull distributions. Both Rayleigh and Weibull distributions are used to fit the empirical data obtained from the world's oceans Global Wave Statistics. The Rayleigh distribution parameter is estimated using Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) while, for the two-parameter Weibull distribution, parameter values are obtained using Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Quantile Estimation (QE). A Chi-square goodness of fit test is then used to see how the fitted distributions compare with the empirical distribution. It is found that Weibull distributions are better fits than the Rayleigh distribution, and that the MLE estimation is the best in this respect.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

652-657

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Jasper, N.H., (1956), Statistical Distribution Patterns of Ocean Waves and Wave Induced Ship Stresses and Motions with Engineering Applications, " Transactions, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.

DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.47257

Google Scholar

[2] Ochi, M.K., (1992), New approach for estimating the severest sea state from statistical data. Proc. Coastal Eng. Conf., p.512–525.

DOI: 10.1061/9780872629332.038

Google Scholar

[3] Ferreira J.A. and Guedes Soares C., (1999), Modelling the long-term distribution of significant wave height with the beta and gamma models. Ocean Eng. 26 8 p.713–725.

DOI: 10.1016/s0029-8018(98)00022-5

Google Scholar

[4] Dean, R. G., and Dalrymple, R. A., (1984). Water Wave Mechanics for Engineers and Scientist, Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

Google Scholar

[5] Battjes J.A., (1971), Long-term wave height distributions at seven stations around the British Isles. Dtsch. Hydrogr. Z., 25, p.179–189.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02312702

Google Scholar

[6] Guedes Soares, C. and Henriques A.C., (1996), Statistical uncertainty in long-term distributions of significant wave height. J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng., 11, p.284–291.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2833917

Google Scholar

[7] Hogben, N., Dacunha, N. M. C., & Olliver, G. F., (1986), Global Wave Statistics. British Maritime Technology Limited.

Google Scholar