Discussion on the Relation between the Adhesive Force of Drosophila Melanogaster and the Surface Roughness of the Substrate

Abstract:

Three forms of animals’ adhesion were analyzed: hairy adhesive pads, smooth adhesive pads and claw. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to observe the surface of friction plate with different particle diameters. It’s found that the particle could be seen as conical shape. The self-designed lever-like testing equipment was also used to measure the adhesive force of drosophila melanogaster contacting 6 substrates with different roughness. It was shown that adhesive force decreased first and finally rose with the increase of surface roughness. When the roughness (R value) was about 68.5nm, it showed that the lowest adhesive force was 0.0085mN. Then model of the Van der Waals force was established. In this model, contact form between seta and the substrate was divided into five states, and the theoretical adhesive force at each state was calculated, which successfully simulated with the actual value. However, when surface roughness reached the situation that the gap between adjacent particles was greater than 2μm, the gripping function of the claw made the actual value greater than theoretical one. It was concluded that adhesive force was a compound function of the Van der Waals force generated by hairy adhesive force and the gripping force generated by claw. So it was also speculated that the fibrous fine pads of insects were the basic form adhesion on smooth surface of the substrate.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 159)
• Pages: 93-98
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.159.93
• Online since: March 2012
• Authors: Rui Guo Cui, Weidong Yu
• Keywords: Adhesive Force, Drosophila Melanogaster, Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), Surface Roughness (SR), Van der Waals Force

References

[1] M.Scherge, S.Gorb, Biological micro-and nano-tribology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001.

[2] K. Autumn, A. Dittmore, D. Santos, Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment, The Journal of Experimental Biology. 209 (2006) 3569-3579.

DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02486

[3] M. G. Langer, J. P. Ruppersberg, Adhesion forces measured at the level of a terminal plate of the fly's seta, Proceeding of the Royal Society B:Biological Science, 271 (2004) 2209-2215.

DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2850

[4] Autumn, Adhesive force of a single foot-hair, nature. 405 (2000) 681-685.

[5] Walter Federle, Mathis Riehle, An integrative study of insect adhesion: mechanics and wet adhesion of pretarsal pads in ants, Integrative and Comparative Biology. 42 (2002) 1100-1106.

DOI: 10.1093/icb/42.6.1100

[6] S.N. Gorb, Matthias Scherge, Biological micro-tribology: anisotropy in frictional forces of orthopteran attachment pads reflects the ultra-structure of a highly deformable material, Proceedings of The Royal Society of London Series B-biological Sciences. 267 (2000) 1239-1244.

DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1133

[7] Gorb SN, Attachment devices of insect cuticle, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2001.

[8] Betz O, Performance and adaptive value of tarsal morphology in rove beetles of the genus Stenus(Coleoptera, Staphylinidae), The Journal of Experimental Biology. 205 (2002) 1097.

DOI: 10.1242/jeb.205.8.1097

[9] Israelachvili J.N, Intermolecular and surface forces, Academic Press INC, California, 1985.

[10] S.N. Gorb, The design of the fly adhesive pad: distal tenent setae are adapted to the delivery of an adhesive secretion, Proceedings of The Royal Society of London Series B-biological Sciences. B265 (1998) 747-752.

DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0356

[11] S.Niederegger, S.N. Gorb and Yuekan Jiao. Contact behaviour of tenent setae in attachment pads of the blowfly Calliphora vicina (Diptera, Calliphoridae), Journal of Comparative Physiology. A187 (2002) 961-970.

DOI: 10.1007/s00359-001-0265-7

[12] G.Huber, S.N. Gorb and N.Hosoda, Influence of surface roughness on gecko adhesion, Acta Biomaterialia. 3 (2007), 29-32.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.01.007