Recovery of Precious Metal Material Ni from Nickel Containing Wastewater Using Electrolysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

The recovery of Ni2+ from nickel containing solution is a worthwhile work, owing to its precious value. In the present work, the optimal values of electrolysis (EL) operating parameters were elaborately investigated using Taguchi approach. The effect of Ni2+ initial concentration, boric acid, pH, and voltage were investigated in terms of nickel recovery and energy consumption. The results obtained showed that the influential factors on nickel recovery were voltage > boric acid > pH > concentration. However, in terms of energy consumption the following order of concentration > boric acid > pH > voltage was obtained. A confirmation experiment was carried out with the optimized parameters (boric acid 18g/L, nickel concentration 1000 mg/L, voltage applied 4.0 V, and pH 4). The recovery of Ni2+ yielded about 88%, and the outlet Ni2+ was as low as 119 mg/L. The electrolysis dynamic mode was investagated with flow rate 20 mL/min. The results showed that the outlet nickel concentration was 350 mg/L equal to 65% of Ni2+ recovery and energy consumption of 25.7 kW h/kg. Electrolysis could effectively recover nickel, however the Ni2+ concentration of the residual electrolyte was much higher than the restriction of 1 mg/L, so we used electrodialysis to further treat the residual electrolyte and the nickel concentration has been reduced below 1 mg/L , which will be discussed in other paper.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

263-267

Citation:

Online since:

April 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Archana Agrawal , D. Bagchi, S. Kumari and V. Kumar, B.D. Pandey: Powder Technology, Vol. 177 (2007), pp.133-139.

Google Scholar

[2] I. Giannopoulou and D. Panias:Minerals Engineering,Vol. 20 (2007), pp.753-760.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Helen Kalavathy and Lima Rose Miranda: Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol.158 (2010), pp.188-199.

Google Scholar

[4] P. Senthil Kumar, S. Ramalingam, S. Dinesh Kirupha, A. Murugesan, T. Vidhyadevi and S.Sivanesan: Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol.167 (2011), pp.122-131.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.12.010

Google Scholar

[5] K.Dermentzis: Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol.173 (2010), pp.647-652.

Google Scholar

[6] F. Akbal and S. Camc: Desalination, Vol.269 (2011), pp.214-222.

Google Scholar

[7] A.H. Elshazly and A.H. Konsowa: Desalination , Vol.158(2003), pp.189-193.

Google Scholar

[8] C.S. Peng , Y.Y. Liu, J. J.Bi, H.Z. Xu and A. Abou-Shady: Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol.189 (2011) , pp.814-820.

Google Scholar

[9] A. Abou-Shady, C.S. Peng, J.J. Bi, H.Z.Xu and J. Almeria O: Desalination, Vol.286 (2012), pp.304-315.

Google Scholar

[10] R. Idhayachander and K. Palanivelu: E-Journal of Chemistry, Vol.7(2010), pp.1412-1420.

Google Scholar

[11] J.Lu, Q.H. Yang and Z.Zhang: Nonferrous Met. Soc. China , Vol.20(2010) , p.s97-s101.

Google Scholar

[12] Y.D. Shu, R.R. Zhao, B.Z. Chen, Q.Y.Fu and H.Y. Jiang: Nonferrous Metals, Vol.3(1983), pp.47-50. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar