A Design of Cesium Atomic Magnetometer Based on Circular Dichroism

Article Preview

Abstract:

Recently, atomic magnetometers have been reported as the most sensitive magnetometers by completely eliminating the spin exchange relaxation. In this paper, we described a design of highly sensitive cesium atomic magnetometer based on circular dichroism, which had the advantage of easily locking the probing laser to the necessary frequency compared with those based on circular birefringence. In order to polarize the cesium atoms uniformly, the pumping laser light was separated into two counter-propagating and counter-circular polarization beams through the atomic vapor cell. We employed a circular analyzer optical configuration to measure the ellipticity of the probing light, which indicated the amplitude of the magnetic field. The external magnetic field was tracked by a digital auto frequency tracking system.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

268-272

Citation:

Online since:

October 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] I.M. Savukov and M.V. Romalis: Physical Review Letters Vol. 94 (2005), p.1230001.

Google Scholar

[2] Shoujun Xu, et al.: PNAS Vol. 103, No. 34 (2006), pp.12688-12671.

Google Scholar

[3] H. Xia, A. Ben-Amar Baranga, D. Hoffman and M.V. Romalis: Applied Physics Letters Vol. 89 (2006), p.211104.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2392722

Google Scholar

[4] Cort Johnson and Peter D.D. Schwindt: A two-color pump probe atomic magnetometer for magnetoencephalography, IEEE (2010), pp.371-375.

DOI: 10.1109/freq.2010.5556310

Google Scholar

[5] Cort Johnson, Peter D.D. Schwindt and Michael Weisend: Applied Physics Letters Vol. 97 (2010), p.243073.

Google Scholar

[6] Andrei Ben-Amar Baranga, Dan Hoffman, Hui Xia and Michael V. Romalis: An atomic magnetometer for brain activity imaging, IEEE (2005), pp.417-418.

DOI: 10.1109/rtc.2005.1547485

Google Scholar

[7] H. Xia, A. Ben-Amar Baranga, D. Hoffman and M.V. Romalis: Detection of auditory evoked responses with atomic magnetometer, International Congress Series 1300 (2007), pp.627-630.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ics.2007.02.028

Google Scholar

[8] B Lindseth, P Schwindt, J Kitching, D Fischer and V Schusterman: Computers in Cardiology Vol. 34 (2007), pp.443-446.

Google Scholar

[9] J.C. Allred, R.N. Lyman, T.W. Kornack and M.V. Romalis: Physical Review Letters Vol. 89, No. 13 (2002), p.130801.

Google Scholar

[10] D. Budker, D.F. Kimball, S.M. Rochester, V.V. Yashchuk and M. Zolotorev: Physical Review A Vol. 62 (2000), p.043403.

Google Scholar

[11] V. Acosta, M.P. Ledbetter, S.M. Rochester and D. Budker: Physical Review A Vol. 73 (2006), p.053404.

Google Scholar

[12] Dmitry Budker and Michael Romalis: Nature Physics Vol. 3 (2007), pp.227-234.

Google Scholar

[13] H.B. Dang, A.C. Maloof and M.V. Romalis: Applied Physics Letters Vol. 97 (2010), p.151110.

Google Scholar

[14] Valeriy V. Yashchuk, Dmitry Budker and John R. Davis: Review of Scientific Insruments Vol. 71, No. 2 (2000), pp.341-346.

Google Scholar

[15] M.P. Ledbetter, I.M. Savukov, et al.: Physical Review A Vol. 77 (2008), p.033408.

Google Scholar

[16] M.T. Graf, D.F. Kimball, et al.: Physical Review A Vol. 72 (2005), p.023401.

Google Scholar