Comparison Study on Growth, Removal of Nitrogen and Phosphorus, and Nutritional Property of Two Species of Microalgae

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to screen the microalgae species for purifying aquaculture wastewater effectively and producing biomass with high nutritional value, two species of microalgae lately isolated from aquaculture wastewater were studied concerning theirs growth, removal efficiencies of nitrogen and phosphorus, and nutritional property. Results showed that the maximum biomass (dry weight) of Scenedesmus and Selenastrum were 0.78g•L-1 and 0.53g•L-1, respectively; their maximum biomass (dry weight) growth rate were 0.05g•(L•d)-1 and 0.03g•(L•d)-1, respectively. In 23 days, the removal efficiencies of TN by Scenedesmus and Selenastrum were 85.1% and 72.5%, respectively; TP could be efficiently removed by 82.6% and 79.7%, respectively. At the stable phase, the crude protein content and crude protein production (dry weight) of Scenedesmus, Selenastrum were 31.8%, 19.2% and 0.24g•L-1, 0.09g•L-1, respectively; the crude lipid content and crude lipid production (dry weight) of them were 7.81%, 9.26% and 0.06g•L-1, 0.05g•L-1, respectively. In general, Scenedesmus has obvious advantages over Selenastrum in the respects of growth, removal of nitrogen and phosphorus and nutritional value, and it can be used as the preferred algal species for follow-up study.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1923-1928

Citation:

Online since:

October 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Hongfang Ma, Xi Li, Hongying Hu, Yin Yu, Yinhu Wu: Environ. Sci. Vol. 33 (2012), pp.115-120 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Xi Li, Hongying Hu, Ke Kan, Yingxue Sun: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 101 (2010), P. 5494-5500.

Google Scholar

[3] A.V. Fernández, G. Vargas, N. Alarcón, A. Velasco: Biomass Bioeneg. Vol. 32 (2008), P. 338-344.

Google Scholar

[4] A.K. Pettersen, G.M. Turchini, S. Jahangard, B.A. Ingram, C.D.H. Sherman: Aquaculture. Vol. 309 (2010), P. 115-124.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Fierro, M.P. Sánchez-Saavedra, C. Copalcúa: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 99 (2008), P. 1274-1279.

Google Scholar

[6] Xi Li, Hongying Hu, Jia Yang: New Biotechnol. Vol. 27 (2010), P. 59-63.

Google Scholar

[7] Xi Li, Hongying Hu, Ke Kan, Jia Ying: Ecol. Eng. Vol. 36 (2010), P. 379-381.

Google Scholar

[8] P. Seixas, P. Coutinho, M. Ferreira, A. Otero: Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. Vol. 381 (2009), P. 1-9.

Google Scholar

[9] K.H. Ogbonda, R.E. Aminigo, G.O. Abu: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 98 (2007), P. 2207-2211.

Google Scholar

[10] L.C.C. Martinez, C. Knysak, L. Capurro guimarães, E.D.G. Danesi, S. Sato, J.C.M. Carvalho: Journal Biotechnol. Vol. 150 (2010), P. 88.

Google Scholar

[11] Xi Li, Hongying Hu, Jia Yang: Environ. Sci. Vol. 31 (2010), pp.513-519 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] State Environmental Protection Administration: Monitoring Method of Water and Wastewater (China Environ. Sci. Press, Beijing, 2002).

Google Scholar

[13] State Bureau of Technical Supervision: Method for the determination of crude protein in feed (Standards Press of China, Beijing, 1994).

Google Scholar

[14] Xi Li, Hongying Hu, Yuping Zhang: Environ. Sci. Vol. 32 (2011), pp.2260-2266 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[15] Xi Li, Hongying Hu, Yuping Zhang: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 102 (2011), P. 3098-3102.

Google Scholar

[16] Yuantu Ye: Feed Wide-angle. Vol. 10 (2005), P. 32-35 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[17] Haibo Yang, Yuan Yu, Yang Liu, Xinhua Zhang: Fisheries Science. Vol. 23 (2004), P. 6-9. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar